Can't figure out a htaccess ruleWhy does this mod_rewrite rule 'not-match'? (big rewrite log included)Can...
Did ancient Germans take pride in leaving the land untouched?
Do the speed limit reductions due to pollution also apply to electric cars in France?
Is there any way to play D&D without a DM?
Can you say "leftside right"?
Can someone explain what a key is?
Integer but not Laurent sequences
Isn't a semicolon (';') needed after a function declaration in C++?
Does Plato's "Ring of Gyges" have a corrupting influence on its wearer?
Can't figure out a htaccess rule
Manager has noticed coworker's excessive breaks. Should I warn him?
When does a person lose diplomatic status?
How to transport 10,000 terrestrial trolls across ocean fast?
Missing a connection and don't have money to book next flight
Converting numbers to words - Python
How bad is a Computer Science course that doesn't teach Design Patterns?
What is formjacking?
Is it possible to detect 100% of SQLi with a simple regex?
What is an efficient way to digitize a family photo collection?
Why don't you get burned by the wood benches in a sauna?
How can I give a Ranger advantage on a check due to Favored Enemy without spoiling the story for the player?
Will the duration of traveling to Ceres using the same tech developed for going to Mars be proportional to the distance to go to Mars or not?
Is the tritone (A4 / d5) still banned in Roman Catholic music?
What is wrong with my use of "find -print0"?
Is there any danger of my neighbor having my wife's signature?
Can't figure out a htaccess rule
Why does this mod_rewrite rule 'not-match'? (big rewrite log included)Can mod_rewrite Conditions/Rules be executed in random order?Can't set up rewrite rule for different folder in htaccessCan I redirect to the newest file in directory using .htaccess?Mod_rewite - do these rewrite rules work?Difference b/w .htaccess and example.com.confrewrite rule does not rewrite url as expectedA specific issue with Apache 2.2 URL rewritingWhat does this wordpress .htaccess rule do?Why doesn't this .htaccess file redirect properly?
I have this in my htaccess but can't figure out what its for.
Because of the nature of rule, searching doesn't help either.
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
Can anyone please explain what its for?
linux apache-2.2 apache-2.4 .htaccess mod-rewrite
asked 1 hour ago
Richard1984Richard1984
83
New contributor
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have this in my htaccess but can't figure out what its for.
Because of the nature of rule, searching doesn't help either.
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
Can anyone please explain what its for?
linux apache-2.2 apache-2.4 .htaccess mod-rewrite
asked 1 hour ago
Richard1984Richard1984
83
New contributor
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have this in my htaccess but can't figure out what its for.
Because of the nature of rule, searching doesn't help either.
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
Can anyone please explain what its for?
linux apache-2.2 apache-2.4 .htaccess mod-rewrite
asked 1 hour ago
Richard1984Richard1984
83
New contributor
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have this in my htaccess but can't figure out what its for.
Because of the nature of rule, searching doesn't help either.
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
Can anyone please explain what its for?
linux apache-2.2 apache-2.4 .htaccess mod-rewrite
linux apache-2.2 apache-2.4 .htaccess mod-rewrite
asked 1 hour ago
Richard1984Richard1984
83
New contributor
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
Richard1984Richard1984
83
New contributor
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
Richard1984Richard1984
83
New contributor
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
Richard1984Richard1984
83
asked 1 hour ago
Richard1984Richard1984
83
83
New contributor
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Richard1984 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
All this rule does is to add a trailing / to your URLS if there is none and if there is no . in the URI, so https://example.org/test will be redirected to https://example.org/test/, but https://example.org/test.html will not be rewritten to https://example.org/test.html/
## Do the following if the URI does not end with `/` or does not contain an `.`:
## the . is relevant for file names like test.html, which should n
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
## Redirect it to the original URI with an added `/` and mark this as permanent:
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 50 mins ago
Sven♦Sven
86.8k10144198
@MrWhite: You are right of course. Silly me ...
– Sven♦
48 mins ago
As the accepted answer you could add the edge-case to your answer (see my answer).
– Joffrey
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Without validating, but using my experience in Apache rewriting, this configuration seems to:
- Match on the 'path' part of the URI (not the server, port, or query parameters), for example '/my/location/file.html'.
- Match if this part does not end on a '/' (forward-slash) character, -or- does not include a '.' (dot) character.
- Use the full path part of the URI and append a forward-slash to it.
- Send a HTTP 301 (permanent) redirect to direct the browser to this new URI.
This will result in the following test cases
/ -> /
/test -> /test/
/my/resource -> /my/resource/
/my/resource.type -> /my/resource.type
/edge.case/resource -> /edge.case/resource
So I think the rule has a purpose of adding slashes to resources that do not seem to be a file, but it seems to have an edge-case.
If not adding a slash to a resource with '.' (dot) character in the non-file part of the path the regular expression should be changed to:
# match paths which do not end with a slash, or do not resemble a file with an extension
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.[^/]*)
# redirect permanently to the same uri with a slash
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 48 mins ago
JoffreyJoffrey
1,451712
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Richard1984 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f955402%2fcant-figure-out-a-htaccess-rule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
All this rule does is to add a trailing / to your URLS if there is none and if there is no . in the URI, so https://example.org/test will be redirected to https://example.org/test/, but https://example.org/test.html will not be rewritten to https://example.org/test.html/
## Do the following if the URI does not end with `/` or does not contain an `.`:
## the . is relevant for file names like test.html, which should n
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
## Redirect it to the original URI with an added `/` and mark this as permanent:
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 50 mins ago
Sven♦Sven
86.8k10144198
@MrWhite: You are right of course. Silly me ...
– Sven♦
48 mins ago
As the accepted answer you could add the edge-case to your answer (see my answer).
– Joffrey
42 mins ago
add a comment |
All this rule does is to add a trailing / to your URLS if there is none and if there is no . in the URI, so https://example.org/test will be redirected to https://example.org/test/, but https://example.org/test.html will not be rewritten to https://example.org/test.html/
## Do the following if the URI does not end with `/` or does not contain an `.`:
## the . is relevant for file names like test.html, which should n
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
## Redirect it to the original URI with an added `/` and mark this as permanent:
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 50 mins ago
Sven♦Sven
86.8k10144198
@MrWhite: You are right of course. Silly me ...
– Sven♦
48 mins ago
As the accepted answer you could add the edge-case to your answer (see my answer).
– Joffrey
42 mins ago
add a comment |
All this rule does is to add a trailing / to your URLS if there is none and if there is no . in the URI, so https://example.org/test will be redirected to https://example.org/test/, but https://example.org/test.html will not be rewritten to https://example.org/test.html/
## Do the following if the URI does not end with `/` or does not contain an `.`:
## the . is relevant for file names like test.html, which should n
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
## Redirect it to the original URI with an added `/` and mark this as permanent:
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 50 mins ago
Sven♦Sven
86.8k10144198
All this rule does is to add a trailing / to your URLS if there is none and if there is no . in the URI, so https://example.org/test will be redirected to https://example.org/test/, but https://example.org/test.html will not be rewritten to https://example.org/test.html/
## Do the following if the URI does not end with `/` or does not contain an `.`:
## the . is relevant for file names like test.html, which should n
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.)
## Redirect it to the original URI with an added `/` and mark this as permanent:
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 50 mins ago
Sven♦Sven
86.8k10144198
edited 46 mins ago
answered 50 mins ago
Sven♦Sven
86.8k10144198
answered 50 mins ago
Sven♦Sven
86.8k10144198
answered 50 mins ago
Sven♦Sven
86.8k10144198
86.8k10144198
@MrWhite: You are right of course. Silly me ...
– Sven♦
48 mins ago
As the accepted answer you could add the edge-case to your answer (see my answer).
– Joffrey
42 mins ago
add a comment |
@MrWhite: You are right of course. Silly me ...
– Sven♦
48 mins ago
As the accepted answer you could add the edge-case to your answer (see my answer).
– Joffrey
42 mins ago
@MrWhite: You are right of course. Silly me ...
– Sven♦
48 mins ago
@MrWhite: You are right of course. Silly me ...
– Sven♦
48 mins ago
As the accepted answer you could add the edge-case to your answer (see my answer).
– Joffrey
42 mins ago
As the accepted answer you could add the edge-case to your answer (see my answer).
– Joffrey
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Without validating, but using my experience in Apache rewriting, this configuration seems to:
- Match on the 'path' part of the URI (not the server, port, or query parameters), for example '/my/location/file.html'.
- Match if this part does not end on a '/' (forward-slash) character, -or- does not include a '.' (dot) character.
- Use the full path part of the URI and append a forward-slash to it.
- Send a HTTP 301 (permanent) redirect to direct the browser to this new URI.
This will result in the following test cases
/ -> /
/test -> /test/
/my/resource -> /my/resource/
/my/resource.type -> /my/resource.type
/edge.case/resource -> /edge.case/resource
So I think the rule has a purpose of adding slashes to resources that do not seem to be a file, but it seems to have an edge-case.
If not adding a slash to a resource with '.' (dot) character in the non-file part of the path the regular expression should be changed to:
# match paths which do not end with a slash, or do not resemble a file with an extension
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.[^/]*)
# redirect permanently to the same uri with a slash
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 48 mins ago
JoffreyJoffrey
1,451712
add a comment |
Without validating, but using my experience in Apache rewriting, this configuration seems to:
- Match on the 'path' part of the URI (not the server, port, or query parameters), for example '/my/location/file.html'.
- Match if this part does not end on a '/' (forward-slash) character, -or- does not include a '.' (dot) character.
- Use the full path part of the URI and append a forward-slash to it.
- Send a HTTP 301 (permanent) redirect to direct the browser to this new URI.
This will result in the following test cases
/ -> /
/test -> /test/
/my/resource -> /my/resource/
/my/resource.type -> /my/resource.type
/edge.case/resource -> /edge.case/resource
So I think the rule has a purpose of adding slashes to resources that do not seem to be a file, but it seems to have an edge-case.
If not adding a slash to a resource with '.' (dot) character in the non-file part of the path the regular expression should be changed to:
# match paths which do not end with a slash, or do not resemble a file with an extension
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.[^/]*)
# redirect permanently to the same uri with a slash
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 48 mins ago
JoffreyJoffrey
1,451712
add a comment |
Without validating, but using my experience in Apache rewriting, this configuration seems to:
- Match on the 'path' part of the URI (not the server, port, or query parameters), for example '/my/location/file.html'.
- Match if this part does not end on a '/' (forward-slash) character, -or- does not include a '.' (dot) character.
- Use the full path part of the URI and append a forward-slash to it.
- Send a HTTP 301 (permanent) redirect to direct the browser to this new URI.
This will result in the following test cases
/ -> /
/test -> /test/
/my/resource -> /my/resource/
/my/resource.type -> /my/resource.type
/edge.case/resource -> /edge.case/resource
So I think the rule has a purpose of adding slashes to resources that do not seem to be a file, but it seems to have an edge-case.
If not adding a slash to a resource with '.' (dot) character in the non-file part of the path the regular expression should be changed to:
# match paths which do not end with a slash, or do not resemble a file with an extension
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.[^/]*)
# redirect permanently to the same uri with a slash
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 48 mins ago
JoffreyJoffrey
1,451712
Without validating, but using my experience in Apache rewriting, this configuration seems to:
- Match on the 'path' part of the URI (not the server, port, or query parameters), for example '/my/location/file.html'.
- Match if this part does not end on a '/' (forward-slash) character, -or- does not include a '.' (dot) character.
- Use the full path part of the URI and append a forward-slash to it.
- Send a HTTP 301 (permanent) redirect to direct the browser to this new URI.
This will result in the following test cases
/ -> /
/test -> /test/
/my/resource -> /my/resource/
/my/resource.type -> /my/resource.type
/edge.case/resource -> /edge.case/resource
So I think the rule has a purpose of adding slashes to resources that do not seem to be a file, but it seems to have an edge-case.
If not adding a slash to a resource with '.' (dot) character in the non-file part of the path the regular expression should be changed to:
# match paths which do not end with a slash, or do not resemble a file with an extension
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(/$|.[^/]*)
# redirect permanently to the same uri with a slash
RewriteRule (.*) %{REQUEST_URI}/ [R=301]
answered 48 mins ago
JoffreyJoffrey
1,451712
edited 28 mins ago
answered 48 mins ago
JoffreyJoffrey
1,451712
answered 48 mins ago
JoffreyJoffrey
1,451712
answered 48 mins ago
JoffreyJoffrey
1,451712
1,451712
add a comment |
add a comment |
Richard1984 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Richard1984 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Richard1984 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Richard1984 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f955402%2fcant-figure-out-a-htaccess-rule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
