Vjylku

Could this Scherzo by Beethoven be considered to be a fugue?

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

Custom alignment for GeoMarkers

Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?

Are ETF trackers fundamentally better than individual stocks?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

How to pronounce "I ♥ Huckabees"?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Knife as defense against stray dogs

ERC721: How to get the owned tokens of an address

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?

How can we have a quark condensate without a quark potential?

Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?

About the actual radiative impact of greenhouse gas emission over time

Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?

Is "upgrade" the right word to use in this context?

et qui - how do you really understand that kind of phraseology?

Relationship between sampajanna definitions in SN 47.2 and SN 47.35

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

Simplify an interface for flexibly applying rules to periods of time

Could this Scherzo by Beethoven be considered to be a fugue?

Beethoven repeated sforzandoHow to Write A FugueGuide to Art of the Fugue?Any information on this tease of a fugue in Beethoven's Hammerklavier?Beethoven piano concerto 3 mvt 3Beethoven sonata pathetique, playing with small handsBeethoven Kreutzer string quintetWhat makes a piece a fugue?Unplayable turn in Beethoven sonataHow to overcome emotional tension with this Beethoven rondo

3

I have listened to the scherzo of Beethoven's Piano Sonata op. 2 no. 3 and it is very fugal in nature. It even has a fugal exposition(though it is dominant, dominant, dominant, dominant of dominant, in terms of the key in which each voice appears, which Bach would never do), which I think is unusual, especially for an early Beethoven piece. Now I'm not saying fugal passages aren't common in Beethoven's pieces because they are. But they usually don't have a true exposition and are thus more like a canon in that sense than a fugue(except that a canon wouldn't have countersubjects, just the same melody delayed and maybe also transposed). This scherzo actually has a true exposition.

Albeit, the trio is very much arpeggios over a bass line which is not fugal at all. But the Scherzo part of the Scherzo and Trio movement is fugal in nature.

Could this Scherzo actually be considered a fugue since it has not only imitation and countersubjects(well at least 1 after the first repeat), but a full exposition(albeit it breaks some Baroque 4 part counterpoint rules, but Beethoven was an innovative composer who broke the rules because they deserved to be broken)?

piano beethoven fugue

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

CatersCaters

1,0671821

add a comment | 

3

I have listened to the scherzo of Beethoven's Piano Sonata op. 2 no. 3 and it is very fugal in nature. It even has a fugal exposition(though it is dominant, dominant, dominant, dominant of dominant, in terms of the key in which each voice appears, which Bach would never do), which I think is unusual, especially for an early Beethoven piece. Now I'm not saying fugal passages aren't common in Beethoven's pieces because they are. But they usually don't have a true exposition and are thus more like a canon in that sense than a fugue(except that a canon wouldn't have countersubjects, just the same melody delayed and maybe also transposed). This scherzo actually has a true exposition.

Albeit, the trio is very much arpeggios over a bass line which is not fugal at all. But the Scherzo part of the Scherzo and Trio movement is fugal in nature.

Could this Scherzo actually be considered a fugue since it has not only imitation and countersubjects(well at least 1 after the first repeat), but a full exposition(albeit it breaks some Baroque 4 part counterpoint rules, but Beethoven was an innovative composer who broke the rules because they deserved to be broken)?

piano beethoven fugue

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

CatersCaters

1,0671821

add a comment | 

I have listened to the scherzo of Beethoven's Piano Sonata op. 2 no. 3 and it is very fugal in nature. It even has a fugal exposition(though it is dominant, dominant, dominant, dominant of dominant, in terms of the key in which each voice appears, which Bach would never do), which I think is unusual, especially for an early Beethoven piece. Now I'm not saying fugal passages aren't common in Beethoven's pieces because they are. But they usually don't have a true exposition and are thus more like a canon in that sense than a fugue(except that a canon wouldn't have countersubjects, just the same melody delayed and maybe also transposed). This scherzo actually has a true exposition.

Albeit, the trio is very much arpeggios over a bass line which is not fugal at all. But the Scherzo part of the Scherzo and Trio movement is fugal in nature.

Could this Scherzo actually be considered a fugue since it has not only imitation and countersubjects(well at least 1 after the first repeat), but a full exposition(albeit it breaks some Baroque 4 part counterpoint rules, but Beethoven was an innovative composer who broke the rules because they deserved to be broken)?

piano beethoven fugue

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

CatersCaters

1,0671821

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

CatersCaters

1,0671821

share|improve this question

asked 58 mins ago

CatersCaters

1,0671821

asked 58 mins ago

CatersCaters

1,0671821

asked 58 mins ago

CatersCaters

1,0671821

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

3

This is not a fugue, nor a fugato section within a larger work. I get the comparison with a fugal exposition but I think this is being too loose. Too many expectations of a fugal exposition aren't present. The music doesn't preserve the polyphonic texture, indeed as much of the scherzo's texture is homophonic. This is just free imitation.

The last movements of Op 101 and Op 106 are examples of genuine fugal writing in Beethoven's sonatas.

share|improve this answer

answered 40 mins ago

repletereplete

2,480518

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81554%2fcould-this-scherzo-by-beethoven-be-considered-to-be-a-fugue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

This is not a fugue, nor a fugato section within a larger work. I get the comparison with a fugal exposition but I think this is being too loose. Too many expectations of a fugal exposition aren't present. The music doesn't preserve the polyphonic texture, indeed as much of the scherzo's texture is homophonic. This is just free imitation.

The last movements of Op 101 and Op 106 are examples of genuine fugal writing in Beethoven's sonatas.

share|improve this answer

answered 40 mins ago

repletereplete

2,480518

add a comment | 

3

This is not a fugue, nor a fugato section within a larger work. I get the comparison with a fugal exposition but I think this is being too loose. Too many expectations of a fugal exposition aren't present. The music doesn't preserve the polyphonic texture, indeed as much of the scherzo's texture is homophonic. This is just free imitation.

The last movements of Op 101 and Op 106 are examples of genuine fugal writing in Beethoven's sonatas.

share|improve this answer

answered 40 mins ago

repletereplete

2,480518

add a comment | 

This is not a fugue, nor a fugato section within a larger work. I get the comparison with a fugal exposition but I think this is being too loose. Too many expectations of a fugal exposition aren't present. The music doesn't preserve the polyphonic texture, indeed as much of the scherzo's texture is homophonic. This is just free imitation.

The last movements of Op 101 and Op 106 are examples of genuine fugal writing in Beethoven's sonatas.

share|improve this answer

answered 40 mins ago

repletereplete

2,480518

share|improve this answer

answered 40 mins ago

repletereplete

2,480518

answered 40 mins ago

repletereplete

2,480518

answered 40 mins ago

repletereplete

2,480518