Counting monomials in skew-symmetric+diagonal matricesEquivalence class of permutations based on cycle...
Counting monomials in skew-symmetric+diagonal matrices
Equivalence class of permutations based on cycle decomposition and their inversesShowing a matrix is negative definite [formerly Showing a sum is always positive]What is the number of $2ntimes 2n$-matrices $g=begin{pmatrix} A & B \ C & -A^{t} end{pmatrix}$, $B$ and $C$ symmetric, over the finite field $mathbb{F}_{q}$ with $mathrm{rank}(g)=k$?Estimating a sum involving binomial coefficients [refined]Why does this antisymmetric product factor out a determinant?Set counting problem with a cap on the intersection between the set and a fixed partitionNumber Theory and p-Power-Partitioned NumbersHankel determinant evaluation of special lattice pathsArgmax of weighted sum of binomialsDeterminant of “skew-symmetric” matricesThe vanishing of sum of coefficients: symmetric polynomials
$begingroup$
This question is motivated by Richard Stanley's answer to this MO question.
Let $g(n)$ be the number of distinct monomials in the expansion of the determinant of an $ntimes n$ generic "skew-symmetric $+$ diagonal" matrix.
For example, $g(3)=4$ since
begin{align*}
detbegin{pmatrix} x_{1,1}&x_{1,2}&x_{1,3} \
-x_{1,2}&x_{2,2}&x_{2,3} \ -x_{1,3}&-x_{2,3}&x_{3,3}
end{pmatrix}
&=x_{1, 1}x_{2, 2}x_{3, 3}+x_{1, 1}x_{2, 3}^2+x_{1, 2}^2x_{3, 3}
+x_{1, 3}^2x_{2, 2}.
end{align*}
The sequence $g(n)$ seems to have found a match in OEIS with the generating function
$$ sum_{ngeq 0} g(n)frac{x^n}{n!} = frac{e^x}{1-frac12x^2}.$$
QUESTION. Is it true and can you furnish a proof for
$$g(n)=sum_{k=0}^{lfloor frac{n}2rfloor}frac{n!}{(n-2k)!,,2^k}?$$
POSTSCRIPT. I'm convinced by Stanley's reply below, so let's correct the above guess to
$$g(n)=sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}frac{(2k)!}{k!}cdotprod_{i=1}^kfrac{4i-3}4cdotsum_{j=0}^{lfloor n-k/2rfloor}
binom{n-2k}{2j}frac{(2j)!}{4^j,j!}.$$
reference-request co.combinatorics linear-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question is motivated by Richard Stanley's answer to this MO question.
Let $g(n)$ be the number of distinct monomials in the expansion of the determinant of an $ntimes n$ generic "skew-symmetric $+$ diagonal" matrix.
For example, $g(3)=4$ since
begin{align*}
detbegin{pmatrix} x_{1,1}&x_{1,2}&x_{1,3} \
-x_{1,2}&x_{2,2}&x_{2,3} \ -x_{1,3}&-x_{2,3}&x_{3,3}
end{pmatrix}
&=x_{1, 1}x_{2, 2}x_{3, 3}+x_{1, 1}x_{2, 3}^2+x_{1, 2}^2x_{3, 3}
+x_{1, 3}^2x_{2, 2}.
end{align*}
The sequence $g(n)$ seems to have found a match in OEIS with the generating function
$$ sum_{ngeq 0} g(n)frac{x^n}{n!} = frac{e^x}{1-frac12x^2}.$$
QUESTION. Is it true and can you furnish a proof for
$$g(n)=sum_{k=0}^{lfloor frac{n}2rfloor}frac{n!}{(n-2k)!,,2^k}?$$
POSTSCRIPT. I'm convinced by Stanley's reply below, so let's correct the above guess to
$$g(n)=sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}frac{(2k)!}{k!}cdotprod_{i=1}^kfrac{4i-3}4cdotsum_{j=0}^{lfloor n-k/2rfloor}
binom{n-2k}{2j}frac{(2j)!}{4^j,j!}.$$
reference-request co.combinatorics linear-algebra
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If we fix all $n-2k$ diagonal elements, it remains a $2ktimes 2k$ squared Pfaffian. It should contain $(2k)!/2^k$ monomials. On purely combinatorial language, the squared Pfaffian monomials correspond to permutations with even cycles only, but we count these permutations up to the change of order of cycles. In other words, we count the spanning subgraphs of $K_{2n}$ in which every component is either an even cycle or an edge.
$endgroup$
– Fedor Petrov
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question is motivated by Richard Stanley's answer to this MO question.
Let $g(n)$ be the number of distinct monomials in the expansion of the determinant of an $ntimes n$ generic "skew-symmetric $+$ diagonal" matrix.
For example, $g(3)=4$ since
begin{align*}
detbegin{pmatrix} x_{1,1}&x_{1,2}&x_{1,3} \
-x_{1,2}&x_{2,2}&x_{2,3} \ -x_{1,3}&-x_{2,3}&x_{3,3}
end{pmatrix}
&=x_{1, 1}x_{2, 2}x_{3, 3}+x_{1, 1}x_{2, 3}^2+x_{1, 2}^2x_{3, 3}
+x_{1, 3}^2x_{2, 2}.
end{align*}
The sequence $g(n)$ seems to have found a match in OEIS with the generating function
$$ sum_{ngeq 0} g(n)frac{x^n}{n!} = frac{e^x}{1-frac12x^2}.$$
QUESTION. Is it true and can you furnish a proof for
$$g(n)=sum_{k=0}^{lfloor frac{n}2rfloor}frac{n!}{(n-2k)!,,2^k}?$$
POSTSCRIPT. I'm convinced by Stanley's reply below, so let's correct the above guess to
$$g(n)=sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}frac{(2k)!}{k!}cdotprod_{i=1}^kfrac{4i-3}4cdotsum_{j=0}^{lfloor n-k/2rfloor}
binom{n-2k}{2j}frac{(2j)!}{4^j,j!}.$$
reference-request co.combinatorics linear-algebra
$endgroup$
This question is motivated by Richard Stanley's answer to this MO question.
Let $g(n)$ be the number of distinct monomials in the expansion of the determinant of an $ntimes n$ generic "skew-symmetric $+$ diagonal" matrix.
For example, $g(3)=4$ since
begin{align*}
detbegin{pmatrix} x_{1,1}&x_{1,2}&x_{1,3} \
-x_{1,2}&x_{2,2}&x_{2,3} \ -x_{1,3}&-x_{2,3}&x_{3,3}
end{pmatrix}
&=x_{1, 1}x_{2, 2}x_{3, 3}+x_{1, 1}x_{2, 3}^2+x_{1, 2}^2x_{3, 3}
+x_{1, 3}^2x_{2, 2}.
end{align*}
The sequence $g(n)$ seems to have found a match in OEIS with the generating function
$$ sum_{ngeq 0} g(n)frac{x^n}{n!} = frac{e^x}{1-frac12x^2}.$$
QUESTION. Is it true and can you furnish a proof for
$$g(n)=sum_{k=0}^{lfloor frac{n}2rfloor}frac{n!}{(n-2k)!,,2^k}?$$
POSTSCRIPT. I'm convinced by Stanley's reply below, so let's correct the above guess to
$$g(n)=sum_{k=0}^{lfloor n/2rfloor}binom{n}{2k}frac{(2k)!}{k!}cdotprod_{i=1}^kfrac{4i-3}4cdotsum_{j=0}^{lfloor n-k/2rfloor}
binom{n-2k}{2j}frac{(2j)!}{4^j,j!}.$$
reference-request co.combinatorics linear-algebra
reference-request co.combinatorics linear-algebra
edited 54 mins ago
T. Amdeberhan
asked 6 hours ago
T. AmdeberhanT. Amdeberhan
17.7k229131
17.7k229131
1
$begingroup$
If we fix all $n-2k$ diagonal elements, it remains a $2ktimes 2k$ squared Pfaffian. It should contain $(2k)!/2^k$ monomials. On purely combinatorial language, the squared Pfaffian monomials correspond to permutations with even cycles only, but we count these permutations up to the change of order of cycles. In other words, we count the spanning subgraphs of $K_{2n}$ in which every component is either an even cycle or an edge.
$endgroup$
– Fedor Petrov
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
If we fix all $n-2k$ diagonal elements, it remains a $2ktimes 2k$ squared Pfaffian. It should contain $(2k)!/2^k$ monomials. On purely combinatorial language, the squared Pfaffian monomials correspond to permutations with even cycles only, but we count these permutations up to the change of order of cycles. In other words, we count the spanning subgraphs of $K_{2n}$ in which every component is either an even cycle or an edge.
$endgroup$
– Fedor Petrov
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
If we fix all $n-2k$ diagonal elements, it remains a $2ktimes 2k$ squared Pfaffian. It should contain $(2k)!/2^k$ monomials. On purely combinatorial language, the squared Pfaffian monomials correspond to permutations with even cycles only, but we count these permutations up to the change of order of cycles. In other words, we count the spanning subgraphs of $K_{2n}$ in which every component is either an even cycle or an edge.
$endgroup$
– Fedor Petrov
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
If we fix all $n-2k$ diagonal elements, it remains a $2ktimes 2k$ squared Pfaffian. It should contain $(2k)!/2^k$ monomials. On purely combinatorial language, the squared Pfaffian monomials correspond to permutations with even cycles only, but we count these permutations up to the change of order of cycles. In other words, we count the spanning subgraphs of $K_{2n}$ in which every component is either an even cycle or an edge.
$endgroup$
– Fedor Petrov
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The correct generating function is
$$ expleft( x +frac{x^2}{2}+frac 12sum_{ngeq 2}frac{x^{2n}}{2n}right)
=frac{expleft(x+frac{x^2}{4}right)}{(1-x^2)^{1/4}}. $$
This appears in http://oeis.org/A243107, but without a combinatorial or algebraic interpretation. For skew symmetric matrices just multiply by $e^{-x}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, you are right, I missed out on my counting. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– T. Amdeberhan
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f324564%2fcounting-monomials-in-skew-symmetricdiagonal-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The correct generating function is
$$ expleft( x +frac{x^2}{2}+frac 12sum_{ngeq 2}frac{x^{2n}}{2n}right)
=frac{expleft(x+frac{x^2}{4}right)}{(1-x^2)^{1/4}}. $$
This appears in http://oeis.org/A243107, but without a combinatorial or algebraic interpretation. For skew symmetric matrices just multiply by $e^{-x}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, you are right, I missed out on my counting. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– T. Amdeberhan
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The correct generating function is
$$ expleft( x +frac{x^2}{2}+frac 12sum_{ngeq 2}frac{x^{2n}}{2n}right)
=frac{expleft(x+frac{x^2}{4}right)}{(1-x^2)^{1/4}}. $$
This appears in http://oeis.org/A243107, but without a combinatorial or algebraic interpretation. For skew symmetric matrices just multiply by $e^{-x}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, you are right, I missed out on my counting. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– T. Amdeberhan
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The correct generating function is
$$ expleft( x +frac{x^2}{2}+frac 12sum_{ngeq 2}frac{x^{2n}}{2n}right)
=frac{expleft(x+frac{x^2}{4}right)}{(1-x^2)^{1/4}}. $$
This appears in http://oeis.org/A243107, but without a combinatorial or algebraic interpretation. For skew symmetric matrices just multiply by $e^{-x}$.
$endgroup$
The correct generating function is
$$ expleft( x +frac{x^2}{2}+frac 12sum_{ngeq 2}frac{x^{2n}}{2n}right)
=frac{expleft(x+frac{x^2}{4}right)}{(1-x^2)^{1/4}}. $$
This appears in http://oeis.org/A243107, but without a combinatorial or algebraic interpretation. For skew symmetric matrices just multiply by $e^{-x}$.
answered 4 hours ago
Richard StanleyRichard Stanley
28.8k9115189
28.8k9115189
$begingroup$
Oh, you are right, I missed out on my counting. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– T. Amdeberhan
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oh, you are right, I missed out on my counting. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– T. Amdeberhan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh, you are right, I missed out on my counting. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– T. Amdeberhan
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oh, you are right, I missed out on my counting. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– T. Amdeberhan
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f324564%2fcounting-monomials-in-skew-symmetricdiagonal-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
If we fix all $n-2k$ diagonal elements, it remains a $2ktimes 2k$ squared Pfaffian. It should contain $(2k)!/2^k$ monomials. On purely combinatorial language, the squared Pfaffian monomials correspond to permutations with even cycles only, but we count these permutations up to the change of order of cycles. In other words, we count the spanning subgraphs of $K_{2n}$ in which every component is either an even cycle or an edge.
$endgroup$
– Fedor Petrov
5 hours ago