Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters...
How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?
Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?
How should I support this large drywall patch?
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
What do "high sea" and "carry" mean in this sentence?
Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs?
Why is there a PLL in CPU?
Why do remote companies require working in the US?
Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)
How to write papers efficiently when English isn't my first language?
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
Apart from "berlinern", do any other German dialects have a corresponding verb?
How to make a software documentation "officially" citable?
What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?
Visit to the USA with ESTA approved before trip to Iran
Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?
WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves
Return the Closest Prime Number
Does the Brexit deal have to be agreed by both Houses?
Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?
What makes a siege story/plot interesting?
What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?
Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?
CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?
characters
add a comment |
CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?
characters
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
57 mins ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
56 mins ago
add a comment |
CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?
characters
CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?
characters
characters
asked 1 hour ago
AdministratorAdministrator
1675
1675
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
57 mins ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
56 mins ago
add a comment |
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
57 mins ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
56 mins ago
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
57 mins ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
57 mins ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
56 mins ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
56 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "371"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33433%2fwhich-organization-defines-cjk-unified-ideographs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
add a comment |
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
add a comment |
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
edited 38 mins ago
answered 47 mins ago
user3306356♦user3306356
16.7k52972
16.7k52972
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chinese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33433%2fwhich-organization-defines-cjk-unified-ideographs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
57 mins ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
56 mins ago