Examples of subgroups where it's nontrivial to show closure under multiplication?Can a finitely generated...

How to have a sharp product image?

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?

Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?

Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?

How does a program know if stdout is connected to a terminal or a pipe?

What's a good approximation to the zeros of the cosine integral?

Can we say “you can pay when the order gets ready”?

What is the origin of the term "plane of the spirit level"?

How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?

Size of electromagnet needed to replicate Earth's magnetic field

The Defining Moment

555 timer FM transmitter

Examples of subgroups where it's nontrivial to show closure under multiplication?

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Why other Westeros houses don't use wildfire?

Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?

TIKZ - changing one block into parallel multiple blocks

How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?

What term is being referred to with "reflected-sound-of-underground-spirits"?

Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?



Examples of subgroups where it's nontrivial to show closure under multiplication?


Can a finitely generated group have infinitely many torsion elements?The torsion subset of a non-abelian group is not, in general, a subgroup.torsion subgroup of a finitely generated nilpotent group is finite.Is a finitely generated torsion group finite in general?Residually finite group with finitely many conjugacy classes of elements of finite orderPart of simple proof of nontrivial center in p-groupWhy $|G:Z(G)|$ is finite in this question?Is the FC-center of a finitely generated group itself finitely generated?Conjugacy classes generating an infinite groupThe center of a linear group with finite conjugacy classes has finite index













5












$begingroup$


Usually when a subgroup is declared, it is trivial (or at least straightforward to a sophomore) to prove that it is a subgroup under multiplication. For example:




  • Homomorphic image and preimage of a subgroup

  • Center

  • Intersection of two subgroups

  • Stabilizer of a point in a group action

  • Elements of finite conjugacy class


  • $HN$, where $Hleq G$ and $Ntrianglelefteq G$


I'm looking for interesting theorems where a subset is claimed to be a subgroup, but it is nontrivial to verify. I am looking for some kind of structure-theoretic subgroup that can be defined for any group (or a large class of groups), rather than specific examples that are hard to show closure.





I can think of only one example.



Let $Delta(G)$ be those elements with finite conjugacy class (easily seen to be a subgroup), and let $Delta^+(G)$ be its torsion subset. Note that $g$ has finite conjugacy class in $G$ if and only if $[G:C(g)]<infty$ where $C(g)$ is the centralizer.



$$Delta^+(G):={gin G : |langle grangle|<infty, [G:C(g)]<infty}.$$




Theorem: $Delta^+(G)$ is closed under multiplication.




The proof takes 1-2 pages of nontrivial calculations. If $a,b$ are torsion, it's not true that their product $ab$ is torsion --- but amazingly, it is true if $a,b$ have only finitely many conjugates.



Does anyone have any other examples?





Proof of the Theorem, for those interested. You can see it from the following (nontrivial) lemma.




Lemma (Dietzmann). If $[G:Z(G)]<infty$, then $[G,G]$ is finite.




Modulo the (page long) proof of this, let's see why it implies the theorem.



Let $x,yin Delta^+(G)$ so that $x,y$ have finite conjugacy classes and orders. Clearly $xy$ has a finite conjugacy class, so we just have to show that it has finite order.



Let $N$ be the subgroup generated by all the conjugates of $x$ and $y$, so that $N$ is finitely-generated. Then $N/N'$ is an abelian group generated by finitely many torsion elements, hence finite, so $[N:N']<infty$. It is thus enough to show $N'$ is finite, because then $N$ is finite, and since $xyin N$ this completes the proof.



To show $N'$ is finite we use Dietzmann's Lemma: notice $Z(N)=C_N(x)cap C_N(y)$, and these centralizers have finite index in $N$. Therefore $[N:Z(N)]<infty$ and we apply Dietzmann's Lemma.



This was already a somewhat lengthy and interesting argument, and we haven't even proved Dietzmann's Lemma yet!





Edit: a related question is as follows. Name any functions $varphi:Grightarrow H$ that are homomorphisms, but it is nontrivial to show.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The set of torsion elements in a nilpotent group is a subgroup. And the set of elements of order some power of a prime $p$, in a nilpotent group, is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    The set of exponentially distorted elements in a simply connected solvable Lie group is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't remember the precise statement, but there is a theorem that looks like "let the finite group $G$ act transitively on the finite set $X$ such that every element of $G$ has at most one fixed point. Then the set of elements of $G$ that have no fixed point + $e$ is a subgroup of $G$" - if I remember correctly, the proof uses representation theory
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You don't need any use of structure theorem for f.g. abelian groups (clearly every f.g. abelian group generated by torsion elements is finite).
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't know if it qualifies, but it is a very difficult and recent theorem (positive solution to Ore's conjecture) that the set of commutators in every finite simple group is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago
















5












$begingroup$


Usually when a subgroup is declared, it is trivial (or at least straightforward to a sophomore) to prove that it is a subgroup under multiplication. For example:




  • Homomorphic image and preimage of a subgroup

  • Center

  • Intersection of two subgroups

  • Stabilizer of a point in a group action

  • Elements of finite conjugacy class


  • $HN$, where $Hleq G$ and $Ntrianglelefteq G$


I'm looking for interesting theorems where a subset is claimed to be a subgroup, but it is nontrivial to verify. I am looking for some kind of structure-theoretic subgroup that can be defined for any group (or a large class of groups), rather than specific examples that are hard to show closure.





I can think of only one example.



Let $Delta(G)$ be those elements with finite conjugacy class (easily seen to be a subgroup), and let $Delta^+(G)$ be its torsion subset. Note that $g$ has finite conjugacy class in $G$ if and only if $[G:C(g)]<infty$ where $C(g)$ is the centralizer.



$$Delta^+(G):={gin G : |langle grangle|<infty, [G:C(g)]<infty}.$$




Theorem: $Delta^+(G)$ is closed under multiplication.




The proof takes 1-2 pages of nontrivial calculations. If $a,b$ are torsion, it's not true that their product $ab$ is torsion --- but amazingly, it is true if $a,b$ have only finitely many conjugates.



Does anyone have any other examples?





Proof of the Theorem, for those interested. You can see it from the following (nontrivial) lemma.




Lemma (Dietzmann). If $[G:Z(G)]<infty$, then $[G,G]$ is finite.




Modulo the (page long) proof of this, let's see why it implies the theorem.



Let $x,yin Delta^+(G)$ so that $x,y$ have finite conjugacy classes and orders. Clearly $xy$ has a finite conjugacy class, so we just have to show that it has finite order.



Let $N$ be the subgroup generated by all the conjugates of $x$ and $y$, so that $N$ is finitely-generated. Then $N/N'$ is an abelian group generated by finitely many torsion elements, hence finite, so $[N:N']<infty$. It is thus enough to show $N'$ is finite, because then $N$ is finite, and since $xyin N$ this completes the proof.



To show $N'$ is finite we use Dietzmann's Lemma: notice $Z(N)=C_N(x)cap C_N(y)$, and these centralizers have finite index in $N$. Therefore $[N:Z(N)]<infty$ and we apply Dietzmann's Lemma.



This was already a somewhat lengthy and interesting argument, and we haven't even proved Dietzmann's Lemma yet!





Edit: a related question is as follows. Name any functions $varphi:Grightarrow H$ that are homomorphisms, but it is nontrivial to show.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The set of torsion elements in a nilpotent group is a subgroup. And the set of elements of order some power of a prime $p$, in a nilpotent group, is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    The set of exponentially distorted elements in a simply connected solvable Lie group is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't remember the precise statement, but there is a theorem that looks like "let the finite group $G$ act transitively on the finite set $X$ such that every element of $G$ has at most one fixed point. Then the set of elements of $G$ that have no fixed point + $e$ is a subgroup of $G$" - if I remember correctly, the proof uses representation theory
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You don't need any use of structure theorem for f.g. abelian groups (clearly every f.g. abelian group generated by torsion elements is finite).
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't know if it qualifies, but it is a very difficult and recent theorem (positive solution to Ore's conjecture) that the set of commutators in every finite simple group is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


Usually when a subgroup is declared, it is trivial (or at least straightforward to a sophomore) to prove that it is a subgroup under multiplication. For example:




  • Homomorphic image and preimage of a subgroup

  • Center

  • Intersection of two subgroups

  • Stabilizer of a point in a group action

  • Elements of finite conjugacy class


  • $HN$, where $Hleq G$ and $Ntrianglelefteq G$


I'm looking for interesting theorems where a subset is claimed to be a subgroup, but it is nontrivial to verify. I am looking for some kind of structure-theoretic subgroup that can be defined for any group (or a large class of groups), rather than specific examples that are hard to show closure.





I can think of only one example.



Let $Delta(G)$ be those elements with finite conjugacy class (easily seen to be a subgroup), and let $Delta^+(G)$ be its torsion subset. Note that $g$ has finite conjugacy class in $G$ if and only if $[G:C(g)]<infty$ where $C(g)$ is the centralizer.



$$Delta^+(G):={gin G : |langle grangle|<infty, [G:C(g)]<infty}.$$




Theorem: $Delta^+(G)$ is closed under multiplication.




The proof takes 1-2 pages of nontrivial calculations. If $a,b$ are torsion, it's not true that their product $ab$ is torsion --- but amazingly, it is true if $a,b$ have only finitely many conjugates.



Does anyone have any other examples?





Proof of the Theorem, for those interested. You can see it from the following (nontrivial) lemma.




Lemma (Dietzmann). If $[G:Z(G)]<infty$, then $[G,G]$ is finite.




Modulo the (page long) proof of this, let's see why it implies the theorem.



Let $x,yin Delta^+(G)$ so that $x,y$ have finite conjugacy classes and orders. Clearly $xy$ has a finite conjugacy class, so we just have to show that it has finite order.



Let $N$ be the subgroup generated by all the conjugates of $x$ and $y$, so that $N$ is finitely-generated. Then $N/N'$ is an abelian group generated by finitely many torsion elements, hence finite, so $[N:N']<infty$. It is thus enough to show $N'$ is finite, because then $N$ is finite, and since $xyin N$ this completes the proof.



To show $N'$ is finite we use Dietzmann's Lemma: notice $Z(N)=C_N(x)cap C_N(y)$, and these centralizers have finite index in $N$. Therefore $[N:Z(N)]<infty$ and we apply Dietzmann's Lemma.



This was already a somewhat lengthy and interesting argument, and we haven't even proved Dietzmann's Lemma yet!





Edit: a related question is as follows. Name any functions $varphi:Grightarrow H$ that are homomorphisms, but it is nontrivial to show.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Usually when a subgroup is declared, it is trivial (or at least straightforward to a sophomore) to prove that it is a subgroup under multiplication. For example:




  • Homomorphic image and preimage of a subgroup

  • Center

  • Intersection of two subgroups

  • Stabilizer of a point in a group action

  • Elements of finite conjugacy class


  • $HN$, where $Hleq G$ and $Ntrianglelefteq G$


I'm looking for interesting theorems where a subset is claimed to be a subgroup, but it is nontrivial to verify. I am looking for some kind of structure-theoretic subgroup that can be defined for any group (or a large class of groups), rather than specific examples that are hard to show closure.





I can think of only one example.



Let $Delta(G)$ be those elements with finite conjugacy class (easily seen to be a subgroup), and let $Delta^+(G)$ be its torsion subset. Note that $g$ has finite conjugacy class in $G$ if and only if $[G:C(g)]<infty$ where $C(g)$ is the centralizer.



$$Delta^+(G):={gin G : |langle grangle|<infty, [G:C(g)]<infty}.$$




Theorem: $Delta^+(G)$ is closed under multiplication.




The proof takes 1-2 pages of nontrivial calculations. If $a,b$ are torsion, it's not true that their product $ab$ is torsion --- but amazingly, it is true if $a,b$ have only finitely many conjugates.



Does anyone have any other examples?





Proof of the Theorem, for those interested. You can see it from the following (nontrivial) lemma.




Lemma (Dietzmann). If $[G:Z(G)]<infty$, then $[G,G]$ is finite.




Modulo the (page long) proof of this, let's see why it implies the theorem.



Let $x,yin Delta^+(G)$ so that $x,y$ have finite conjugacy classes and orders. Clearly $xy$ has a finite conjugacy class, so we just have to show that it has finite order.



Let $N$ be the subgroup generated by all the conjugates of $x$ and $y$, so that $N$ is finitely-generated. Then $N/N'$ is an abelian group generated by finitely many torsion elements, hence finite, so $[N:N']<infty$. It is thus enough to show $N'$ is finite, because then $N$ is finite, and since $xyin N$ this completes the proof.



To show $N'$ is finite we use Dietzmann's Lemma: notice $Z(N)=C_N(x)cap C_N(y)$, and these centralizers have finite index in $N$. Therefore $[N:Z(N)]<infty$ and we apply Dietzmann's Lemma.



This was already a somewhat lengthy and interesting argument, and we haven't even proved Dietzmann's Lemma yet!





Edit: a related question is as follows. Name any functions $varphi:Grightarrow H$ that are homomorphisms, but it is nontrivial to show.







abstract-algebra group-theory big-list






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 44 mins ago







Ehsaan

















asked 1 hour ago









EhsaanEhsaan

1,143514




1,143514












  • $begingroup$
    The set of torsion elements in a nilpotent group is a subgroup. And the set of elements of order some power of a prime $p$, in a nilpotent group, is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    The set of exponentially distorted elements in a simply connected solvable Lie group is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't remember the precise statement, but there is a theorem that looks like "let the finite group $G$ act transitively on the finite set $X$ such that every element of $G$ has at most one fixed point. Then the set of elements of $G$ that have no fixed point + $e$ is a subgroup of $G$" - if I remember correctly, the proof uses representation theory
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You don't need any use of structure theorem for f.g. abelian groups (clearly every f.g. abelian group generated by torsion elements is finite).
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't know if it qualifies, but it is a very difficult and recent theorem (positive solution to Ore's conjecture) that the set of commutators in every finite simple group is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    The set of torsion elements in a nilpotent group is a subgroup. And the set of elements of order some power of a prime $p$, in a nilpotent group, is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    The set of exponentially distorted elements in a simply connected solvable Lie group is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't remember the precise statement, but there is a theorem that looks like "let the finite group $G$ act transitively on the finite set $X$ such that every element of $G$ has at most one fixed point. Then the set of elements of $G$ that have no fixed point + $e$ is a subgroup of $G$" - if I remember correctly, the proof uses representation theory
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You don't need any use of structure theorem for f.g. abelian groups (clearly every f.g. abelian group generated by torsion elements is finite).
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I don't know if it qualifies, but it is a very difficult and recent theorem (positive solution to Ore's conjecture) that the set of commutators in every finite simple group is a subgroup.
    $endgroup$
    – YCor
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
The set of torsion elements in a nilpotent group is a subgroup. And the set of elements of order some power of a prime $p$, in a nilpotent group, is a subgroup.
$endgroup$
– YCor
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
The set of torsion elements in a nilpotent group is a subgroup. And the set of elements of order some power of a prime $p$, in a nilpotent group, is a subgroup.
$endgroup$
– YCor
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
The set of exponentially distorted elements in a simply connected solvable Lie group is a subgroup.
$endgroup$
– YCor
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
The set of exponentially distorted elements in a simply connected solvable Lie group is a subgroup.
$endgroup$
– YCor
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I don't remember the precise statement, but there is a theorem that looks like "let the finite group $G$ act transitively on the finite set $X$ such that every element of $G$ has at most one fixed point. Then the set of elements of $G$ that have no fixed point + $e$ is a subgroup of $G$" - if I remember correctly, the proof uses representation theory
$endgroup$
– Max
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I don't remember the precise statement, but there is a theorem that looks like "let the finite group $G$ act transitively on the finite set $X$ such that every element of $G$ has at most one fixed point. Then the set of elements of $G$ that have no fixed point + $e$ is a subgroup of $G$" - if I remember correctly, the proof uses representation theory
$endgroup$
– Max
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
You don't need any use of structure theorem for f.g. abelian groups (clearly every f.g. abelian group generated by torsion elements is finite).
$endgroup$
– YCor
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
You don't need any use of structure theorem for f.g. abelian groups (clearly every f.g. abelian group generated by torsion elements is finite).
$endgroup$
– YCor
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I don't know if it qualifies, but it is a very difficult and recent theorem (positive solution to Ore's conjecture) that the set of commutators in every finite simple group is a subgroup.
$endgroup$
– YCor
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I don't know if it qualifies, but it is a very difficult and recent theorem (positive solution to Ore's conjecture) that the set of commutators in every finite simple group is a subgroup.
$endgroup$
– YCor
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Consider the symmetric group $S_n$ on $ngeq 2$ letters. The alternating group $A_n$ is the subgroup of $S_n$ given by all even permutations of $S_n$.



One proof uses the signum or sign function $s:S_nrightarrow{pm 1}$ which assigns to a permutation $pi$, $+1$ if $pi$ is even, and $-1$ if $pi$ is odd.
It can be shown that the sign function is a homomorphism, i.e., $s(pisigma) = s(pi)cdot s(sigma)$.



It follows that the product of two even permutations is even and so the multiplication in $A_n$ is well-defined.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Ah yeah, this is a tricky one too. You can also use determinant of the associated permutation matrix (considered over $mathbf{F}_2$) to construct the sign function, which makes it "easy" to show that it's a homomorphism and its kernel is a subgroup of index $2$, hence normal.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    When I first took group theory, the instructor painstakingly showed that if a permutation is a product of transpositions, then the number of such transpositions is unique modulo $2$. I'm not sure if using determinants properly circumvents this technical argument, or sweeps it under the rug.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Ehsaan: I don't think determinants over $mathbb{F}_2$ will help you much...
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    @darijgrinberg Sorry you're right, don't know what I was thinking. Do it over $mathbf{Q}$ and argue it is $pm 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think that the problem here really is to define an even permutation.
    $endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    3 mins ago



















1












$begingroup$

Let $G=GL(4,k)$ (the group of all $4times4$ inferible matrices with entries in a field $k$) and let $N$ be the subgroup of those matrices $Min GL(4,k)$ of the form$$begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}&a_{13}&a_{14}\a_{21}&a_{22}&a_{23}&a_{24}\0&0&a_{33}&a_{34}\0&0&a_{43}&a_{44}end{bmatrix}.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think this one follows from the fact that 2x2 upper triangular matrices form a group and that you can operate matrices "blockwise".
    $endgroup$
    – yamete kudasai
    1 hour ago





















0












$begingroup$

Generalizing another answer, for any Coxeter system $(W, S) $ there is an alternating subgroup defined as the kernel of the homomorphism $Wto{-1,1}$ sending the elements of the generating set $S$ to $-1$. Most Coxeter groups don't have a representation that is as nice as the symmetric group, so to prove this is a homomorphism we basically have to construct the root system out of the reflections.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3204485%2fexamples-of-subgroups-where-its-nontrivial-to-show-closure-under-multiplication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Consider the symmetric group $S_n$ on $ngeq 2$ letters. The alternating group $A_n$ is the subgroup of $S_n$ given by all even permutations of $S_n$.



    One proof uses the signum or sign function $s:S_nrightarrow{pm 1}$ which assigns to a permutation $pi$, $+1$ if $pi$ is even, and $-1$ if $pi$ is odd.
    It can be shown that the sign function is a homomorphism, i.e., $s(pisigma) = s(pi)cdot s(sigma)$.



    It follows that the product of two even permutations is even and so the multiplication in $A_n$ is well-defined.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Ah yeah, this is a tricky one too. You can also use determinant of the associated permutation matrix (considered over $mathbf{F}_2$) to construct the sign function, which makes it "easy" to show that it's a homomorphism and its kernel is a subgroup of index $2$, hence normal.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      When I first took group theory, the instructor painstakingly showed that if a permutation is a product of transpositions, then the number of such transpositions is unique modulo $2$. I'm not sure if using determinants properly circumvents this technical argument, or sweeps it under the rug.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ehsaan: I don't think determinants over $mathbb{F}_2$ will help you much...
      $endgroup$
      – darij grinberg
      1 hour ago












    • $begingroup$
      @darijgrinberg Sorry you're right, don't know what I was thinking. Do it over $mathbf{Q}$ and argue it is $pm 1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      57 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think that the problem here really is to define an even permutation.
      $endgroup$
      – Carsten S
      3 mins ago
















    2












    $begingroup$

    Consider the symmetric group $S_n$ on $ngeq 2$ letters. The alternating group $A_n$ is the subgroup of $S_n$ given by all even permutations of $S_n$.



    One proof uses the signum or sign function $s:S_nrightarrow{pm 1}$ which assigns to a permutation $pi$, $+1$ if $pi$ is even, and $-1$ if $pi$ is odd.
    It can be shown that the sign function is a homomorphism, i.e., $s(pisigma) = s(pi)cdot s(sigma)$.



    It follows that the product of two even permutations is even and so the multiplication in $A_n$ is well-defined.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Ah yeah, this is a tricky one too. You can also use determinant of the associated permutation matrix (considered over $mathbf{F}_2$) to construct the sign function, which makes it "easy" to show that it's a homomorphism and its kernel is a subgroup of index $2$, hence normal.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      When I first took group theory, the instructor painstakingly showed that if a permutation is a product of transpositions, then the number of such transpositions is unique modulo $2$. I'm not sure if using determinants properly circumvents this technical argument, or sweeps it under the rug.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ehsaan: I don't think determinants over $mathbb{F}_2$ will help you much...
      $endgroup$
      – darij grinberg
      1 hour ago












    • $begingroup$
      @darijgrinberg Sorry you're right, don't know what I was thinking. Do it over $mathbf{Q}$ and argue it is $pm 1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      57 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think that the problem here really is to define an even permutation.
      $endgroup$
      – Carsten S
      3 mins ago














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    Consider the symmetric group $S_n$ on $ngeq 2$ letters. The alternating group $A_n$ is the subgroup of $S_n$ given by all even permutations of $S_n$.



    One proof uses the signum or sign function $s:S_nrightarrow{pm 1}$ which assigns to a permutation $pi$, $+1$ if $pi$ is even, and $-1$ if $pi$ is odd.
    It can be shown that the sign function is a homomorphism, i.e., $s(pisigma) = s(pi)cdot s(sigma)$.



    It follows that the product of two even permutations is even and so the multiplication in $A_n$ is well-defined.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Consider the symmetric group $S_n$ on $ngeq 2$ letters. The alternating group $A_n$ is the subgroup of $S_n$ given by all even permutations of $S_n$.



    One proof uses the signum or sign function $s:S_nrightarrow{pm 1}$ which assigns to a permutation $pi$, $+1$ if $pi$ is even, and $-1$ if $pi$ is odd.
    It can be shown that the sign function is a homomorphism, i.e., $s(pisigma) = s(pi)cdot s(sigma)$.



    It follows that the product of two even permutations is even and so the multiplication in $A_n$ is well-defined.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    WuestenfuxWuestenfux

    5,7801513




    5,7801513












    • $begingroup$
      Ah yeah, this is a tricky one too. You can also use determinant of the associated permutation matrix (considered over $mathbf{F}_2$) to construct the sign function, which makes it "easy" to show that it's a homomorphism and its kernel is a subgroup of index $2$, hence normal.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      When I first took group theory, the instructor painstakingly showed that if a permutation is a product of transpositions, then the number of such transpositions is unique modulo $2$. I'm not sure if using determinants properly circumvents this technical argument, or sweeps it under the rug.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ehsaan: I don't think determinants over $mathbb{F}_2$ will help you much...
      $endgroup$
      – darij grinberg
      1 hour ago












    • $begingroup$
      @darijgrinberg Sorry you're right, don't know what I was thinking. Do it over $mathbf{Q}$ and argue it is $pm 1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      57 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think that the problem here really is to define an even permutation.
      $endgroup$
      – Carsten S
      3 mins ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Ah yeah, this is a tricky one too. You can also use determinant of the associated permutation matrix (considered over $mathbf{F}_2$) to construct the sign function, which makes it "easy" to show that it's a homomorphism and its kernel is a subgroup of index $2$, hence normal.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      When I first took group theory, the instructor painstakingly showed that if a permutation is a product of transpositions, then the number of such transpositions is unique modulo $2$. I'm not sure if using determinants properly circumvents this technical argument, or sweeps it under the rug.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Ehsaan: I don't think determinants over $mathbb{F}_2$ will help you much...
      $endgroup$
      – darij grinberg
      1 hour ago












    • $begingroup$
      @darijgrinberg Sorry you're right, don't know what I was thinking. Do it over $mathbf{Q}$ and argue it is $pm 1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ehsaan
      57 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think that the problem here really is to define an even permutation.
      $endgroup$
      – Carsten S
      3 mins ago
















    $begingroup$
    Ah yeah, this is a tricky one too. You can also use determinant of the associated permutation matrix (considered over $mathbf{F}_2$) to construct the sign function, which makes it "easy" to show that it's a homomorphism and its kernel is a subgroup of index $2$, hence normal.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Ah yeah, this is a tricky one too. You can also use determinant of the associated permutation matrix (considered over $mathbf{F}_2$) to construct the sign function, which makes it "easy" to show that it's a homomorphism and its kernel is a subgroup of index $2$, hence normal.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    When I first took group theory, the instructor painstakingly showed that if a permutation is a product of transpositions, then the number of such transpositions is unique modulo $2$. I'm not sure if using determinants properly circumvents this technical argument, or sweeps it under the rug.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    When I first took group theory, the instructor painstakingly showed that if a permutation is a product of transpositions, then the number of such transpositions is unique modulo $2$. I'm not sure if using determinants properly circumvents this technical argument, or sweeps it under the rug.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    @Ehsaan: I don't think determinants over $mathbb{F}_2$ will help you much...
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    1 hour ago






    $begingroup$
    @Ehsaan: I don't think determinants over $mathbb{F}_2$ will help you much...
    $endgroup$
    – darij grinberg
    1 hour ago














    $begingroup$
    @darijgrinberg Sorry you're right, don't know what I was thinking. Do it over $mathbf{Q}$ and argue it is $pm 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    57 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @darijgrinberg Sorry you're right, don't know what I was thinking. Do it over $mathbf{Q}$ and argue it is $pm 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ehsaan
    57 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    I think that the problem here really is to define an even permutation.
    $endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    3 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    I think that the problem here really is to define an even permutation.
    $endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    3 mins ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $G=GL(4,k)$ (the group of all $4times4$ inferible matrices with entries in a field $k$) and let $N$ be the subgroup of those matrices $Min GL(4,k)$ of the form$$begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}&a_{13}&a_{14}\a_{21}&a_{22}&a_{23}&a_{24}\0&0&a_{33}&a_{34}\0&0&a_{43}&a_{44}end{bmatrix}.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think this one follows from the fact that 2x2 upper triangular matrices form a group and that you can operate matrices "blockwise".
      $endgroup$
      – yamete kudasai
      1 hour ago


















    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $G=GL(4,k)$ (the group of all $4times4$ inferible matrices with entries in a field $k$) and let $N$ be the subgroup of those matrices $Min GL(4,k)$ of the form$$begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}&a_{13}&a_{14}\a_{21}&a_{22}&a_{23}&a_{24}\0&0&a_{33}&a_{34}\0&0&a_{43}&a_{44}end{bmatrix}.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think this one follows from the fact that 2x2 upper triangular matrices form a group and that you can operate matrices "blockwise".
      $endgroup$
      – yamete kudasai
      1 hour ago
















    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    Let $G=GL(4,k)$ (the group of all $4times4$ inferible matrices with entries in a field $k$) and let $N$ be the subgroup of those matrices $Min GL(4,k)$ of the form$$begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}&a_{13}&a_{14}\a_{21}&a_{22}&a_{23}&a_{24}\0&0&a_{33}&a_{34}\0&0&a_{43}&a_{44}end{bmatrix}.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Let $G=GL(4,k)$ (the group of all $4times4$ inferible matrices with entries in a field $k$) and let $N$ be the subgroup of those matrices $Min GL(4,k)$ of the form$$begin{bmatrix}a_{11}&a_{12}&a_{13}&a_{14}\a_{21}&a_{22}&a_{23}&a_{24}\0&0&a_{33}&a_{34}\0&0&a_{43}&a_{44}end{bmatrix}.$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

    178k24139251




    178k24139251








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think this one follows from the fact that 2x2 upper triangular matrices form a group and that you can operate matrices "blockwise".
      $endgroup$
      – yamete kudasai
      1 hour ago
















    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think this one follows from the fact that 2x2 upper triangular matrices form a group and that you can operate matrices "blockwise".
      $endgroup$
      – yamete kudasai
      1 hour ago










    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I think this one follows from the fact that 2x2 upper triangular matrices form a group and that you can operate matrices "blockwise".
    $endgroup$
    – yamete kudasai
    1 hour ago






    $begingroup$
    I think this one follows from the fact that 2x2 upper triangular matrices form a group and that you can operate matrices "blockwise".
    $endgroup$
    – yamete kudasai
    1 hour ago













    0












    $begingroup$

    Generalizing another answer, for any Coxeter system $(W, S) $ there is an alternating subgroup defined as the kernel of the homomorphism $Wto{-1,1}$ sending the elements of the generating set $S$ to $-1$. Most Coxeter groups don't have a representation that is as nice as the symmetric group, so to prove this is a homomorphism we basically have to construct the root system out of the reflections.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Generalizing another answer, for any Coxeter system $(W, S) $ there is an alternating subgroup defined as the kernel of the homomorphism $Wto{-1,1}$ sending the elements of the generating set $S$ to $-1$. Most Coxeter groups don't have a representation that is as nice as the symmetric group, so to prove this is a homomorphism we basically have to construct the root system out of the reflections.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Generalizing another answer, for any Coxeter system $(W, S) $ there is an alternating subgroup defined as the kernel of the homomorphism $Wto{-1,1}$ sending the elements of the generating set $S$ to $-1$. Most Coxeter groups don't have a representation that is as nice as the symmetric group, so to prove this is a homomorphism we basically have to construct the root system out of the reflections.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Generalizing another answer, for any Coxeter system $(W, S) $ there is an alternating subgroup defined as the kernel of the homomorphism $Wto{-1,1}$ sending the elements of the generating set $S$ to $-1$. Most Coxeter groups don't have a representation that is as nice as the symmetric group, so to prove this is a homomorphism we basically have to construct the root system out of the reflections.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 17 mins ago









        Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

        39.5k63870




        39.5k63870






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3204485%2fexamples-of-subgroups-where-its-nontrivial-to-show-closure-under-multiplication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Щит и меч (фильм) Содержание Названия серий | Сюжет |...

            is 'sed' thread safeWhat should someone know about using Python scripts in the shell?Nexenta bash script uses...

            Meter-Bus Содержание Параметры шины | Стандартизация |...