logical reads on global temp table, but not on session-level temp table The Next CEO of Stack...

Salesforce opportunity stages

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

Is it possible to make a 9x9 table fit within the default margins?

Car headlights in a world without electricity

Can this transistor (2n2222) take 6V on emitter-base? Am I reading datasheet incorrectly?

Planeswalker Ability and Death Timing

Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?

Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers

What difference does it make matching a word with/without a trailing whitespace?

How can I separate the number from the unit in argument?

Compilation of a 2d array and a 1d array

My boss doesn't want me to have a side project

A hang glider, sudden unexpected lift to 25,000 feet altitude, what could do this?

Calculating discount not working

Finitely generated matrix groups whose eigenvalues are all algebraic

How does a dynamic QR code work?

Strange use of "whether ... than ..." in official text

Could a dragon use its wings to swim?

It it possible to avoid kiwi.com's automatic online check-in and instead do it manually by yourself?

How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?

How to unfasten electrical subpanel attached with ramset

How do I secure a TV wall mount?

Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico



logical reads on global temp table, but not on session-level temp table



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowGet minimal logging when loading data into temporary tablesCheck existence with EXISTS outperform COUNT! … Not?Which of these queries is best for performance?SQL Server - Logical Reads lowered, Execution time remained the sameMulti-statement TVF vs Inline TVF PerformanceLogical reads different when accessing the same LOB dataOPTION (RECOMPILE) is Always Faster; Why?Does IMAGE column affect query performance even if it's not included in the query?Helpful nonclustered index improved the query but raised logical readsAggregation in Outer Apply vs Left Join vs Derived tableHigh processor utilization when running a stored procedure












4















Consider the following simple MCVE:



SET STATISTICS IO, TIME OFF;
USE tempdb;

IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..#t1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #t1;
CREATE TABLE #t1
(
r int NOT NULL
);

IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..##t1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE ##t1;
CREATE TABLE ##t1
(
r int NOT NULL
);

IF OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.s1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE dbo.s1;
CREATE TABLE dbo.s1
(
r int NOT NULL
PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
);

INSERT INTO dbo.s1 (r)
SELECT TOP(10000) ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL))
FROM sys.syscolumns sc1
CROSS JOIN sys.syscolumns sc2;
GO


When I run the following inserts, inserting into #t1 shows no stats I/O for the temp table. However, inserting into ##t1 does show stats I/O for the temp table.



SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
GO

INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
SELECT r
FROM dbo.s1;


The stats output:



SQL Server parse and compile time: 
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.
Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 9 ms.

(10000 rows affected)


INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
SELECT r
FROM dbo.s1;


SQL Server parse and compile time: 
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.
Table '##t1'. Scan count 0, logical reads 10016, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 47 ms, elapsed time = 45 ms.

(10000 rows affected)


Why are there so many reads on the ##temp table when I'm only inserting into it?










share|improve this question



























    4















    Consider the following simple MCVE:



    SET STATISTICS IO, TIME OFF;
    USE tempdb;

    IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..#t1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #t1;
    CREATE TABLE #t1
    (
    r int NOT NULL
    );

    IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..##t1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE ##t1;
    CREATE TABLE ##t1
    (
    r int NOT NULL
    );

    IF OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.s1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE dbo.s1;
    CREATE TABLE dbo.s1
    (
    r int NOT NULL
    PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
    );

    INSERT INTO dbo.s1 (r)
    SELECT TOP(10000) ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL))
    FROM sys.syscolumns sc1
    CROSS JOIN sys.syscolumns sc2;
    GO


    When I run the following inserts, inserting into #t1 shows no stats I/O for the temp table. However, inserting into ##t1 does show stats I/O for the temp table.



    SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
    GO

    INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
    SELECT r
    FROM dbo.s1;


    The stats output:



    SQL Server parse and compile time: 
    CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.
    Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
    CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 9 ms.

    (10000 rows affected)


    INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
    SELECT r
    FROM dbo.s1;


    SQL Server parse and compile time: 
    CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.
    Table '##t1'. Scan count 0, logical reads 10016, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
    Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
    CPU time = 47 ms, elapsed time = 45 ms.

    (10000 rows affected)


    Why are there so many reads on the ##temp table when I'm only inserting into it?










    share|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4


      1






      Consider the following simple MCVE:



      SET STATISTICS IO, TIME OFF;
      USE tempdb;

      IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..#t1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #t1;
      CREATE TABLE #t1
      (
      r int NOT NULL
      );

      IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..##t1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE ##t1;
      CREATE TABLE ##t1
      (
      r int NOT NULL
      );

      IF OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.s1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE dbo.s1;
      CREATE TABLE dbo.s1
      (
      r int NOT NULL
      PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
      );

      INSERT INTO dbo.s1 (r)
      SELECT TOP(10000) ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL))
      FROM sys.syscolumns sc1
      CROSS JOIN sys.syscolumns sc2;
      GO


      When I run the following inserts, inserting into #t1 shows no stats I/O for the temp table. However, inserting into ##t1 does show stats I/O for the temp table.



      SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
      GO

      INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
      SELECT r
      FROM dbo.s1;


      The stats output:



      SQL Server parse and compile time: 
      CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.
      Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

      SQL Server Execution Times:
      CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 9 ms.

      (10000 rows affected)


      INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
      SELECT r
      FROM dbo.s1;


      SQL Server parse and compile time: 
      CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.
      Table '##t1'. Scan count 0, logical reads 10016, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
      Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

      SQL Server Execution Times:
      CPU time = 47 ms, elapsed time = 45 ms.

      (10000 rows affected)


      Why are there so many reads on the ##temp table when I'm only inserting into it?










      share|improve this question














      Consider the following simple MCVE:



      SET STATISTICS IO, TIME OFF;
      USE tempdb;

      IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..#t1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #t1;
      CREATE TABLE #t1
      (
      r int NOT NULL
      );

      IF OBJECT_ID(N'tempdb..##t1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE ##t1;
      CREATE TABLE ##t1
      (
      r int NOT NULL
      );

      IF OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.s1', N'U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE dbo.s1;
      CREATE TABLE dbo.s1
      (
      r int NOT NULL
      PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
      );

      INSERT INTO dbo.s1 (r)
      SELECT TOP(10000) ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL))
      FROM sys.syscolumns sc1
      CROSS JOIN sys.syscolumns sc2;
      GO


      When I run the following inserts, inserting into #t1 shows no stats I/O for the temp table. However, inserting into ##t1 does show stats I/O for the temp table.



      SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
      GO

      INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
      SELECT r
      FROM dbo.s1;


      The stats output:



      SQL Server parse and compile time: 
      CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.
      Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

      SQL Server Execution Times:
      CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 9 ms.

      (10000 rows affected)


      INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
      SELECT r
      FROM dbo.s1;


      SQL Server parse and compile time: 
      CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.
      Table '##t1'. Scan count 0, logical reads 10016, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
      Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

      SQL Server Execution Times:
      CPU time = 47 ms, elapsed time = 45 ms.

      (10000 rows affected)


      Why are there so many reads on the ##temp table when I'm only inserting into it?







      sql-server sql-server-2016 temporary-tables






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Max VernonMax Vernon

      52k13114230




      52k13114230






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Minimal logging is not being used when using INSERT INTO and global temp tables



          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using INSERT INTO



          INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          When running SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL) while the above query is executing, ~1M rows are returned.



          enter image description here



          One LOP_INSERT_ROW operation for each row + other
          log data.





          The same insert on a local temp table



          INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          Only going up to 700 rows returned by SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL)



          enter image description here



          Minimal logging





          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using SELECT INTO



          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          enter image description here



          SELECT INTO a global temp table with 10k records



          SELECT s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1;


          Time and IO Statistics



          SQL Server parse and compile time: 
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          SQL Server Execution Times:
          CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 10 ms.
          SQL Server parse and compile time:
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.




          Based on this blogpost we can add TABLOCK to initiate minimal logging on a heap table



          INSERT INTO ##t1 WITH(TABLOCK) (r)
          SELECT s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1


          Low logical reads



          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          (10000 rows affected)




          Part of an answer by @PaulWhite on how to achieve minimal logging on temporary tables




          No. Local temporary tables (#temp) are private to the creating
          session, so a table lock hint is not required. A table lock hint would
          be required for a global temporary table (##temp) or a regular table
          (dbo.temp) created in tempdb, because these can be accessed from
          multiple sessions.




          Creating a regular table to test this:



          CREATE TABLE dbo.bla
          (
          r int NOT NULL
          );


          Filling it up with 1M records



          INSERT INTO bla 
          SELECT top(1000000)s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          >1M logical reads on this table



          Table 's1'. Scan count 17, logical reads 155, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'bla'. Scan count 0, logical reads 1001607, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.




          Paul White's answer explaining the logical reads reported on the global temp table




          Generally, logical reads are reported for the target table when the
          insert is not minimally logged.



          These logical reads are associated with finding a place in the
          existing structure to add the new rows. Minimally-logged inserts use
          the bulk-loading mechanism, which allocates whole new pages/extents
          (and so does not need to read the target structure in the same way).






          Conclusion



          The conclusion being that the INSERT INTO is not able to use minimal logging, resulting in logging every inserted row individually in the log file of tempdb when used in combination with a global temp table / normal table.
          Whereas the local temp table/ SELECT INTO/ INSERT INTO ... WITH(TABLOCK) is able to use minimal logging.






          share|improve this answer


























          • @PaulWhite I did not know that that was the explanation for it! Thanks for the feedback, will definitely add that to the answer, thanks!

            – Randi Vertongen
            11 mins ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233689%2flogical-reads-on-global-temp-table-but-not-on-session-level-temp-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          Minimal logging is not being used when using INSERT INTO and global temp tables



          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using INSERT INTO



          INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          When running SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL) while the above query is executing, ~1M rows are returned.



          enter image description here



          One LOP_INSERT_ROW operation for each row + other
          log data.





          The same insert on a local temp table



          INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          Only going up to 700 rows returned by SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL)



          enter image description here



          Minimal logging





          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using SELECT INTO



          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          enter image description here



          SELECT INTO a global temp table with 10k records



          SELECT s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1;


          Time and IO Statistics



          SQL Server parse and compile time: 
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          SQL Server Execution Times:
          CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 10 ms.
          SQL Server parse and compile time:
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.




          Based on this blogpost we can add TABLOCK to initiate minimal logging on a heap table



          INSERT INTO ##t1 WITH(TABLOCK) (r)
          SELECT s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1


          Low logical reads



          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          (10000 rows affected)




          Part of an answer by @PaulWhite on how to achieve minimal logging on temporary tables




          No. Local temporary tables (#temp) are private to the creating
          session, so a table lock hint is not required. A table lock hint would
          be required for a global temporary table (##temp) or a regular table
          (dbo.temp) created in tempdb, because these can be accessed from
          multiple sessions.




          Creating a regular table to test this:



          CREATE TABLE dbo.bla
          (
          r int NOT NULL
          );


          Filling it up with 1M records



          INSERT INTO bla 
          SELECT top(1000000)s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          >1M logical reads on this table



          Table 's1'. Scan count 17, logical reads 155, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'bla'. Scan count 0, logical reads 1001607, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.




          Paul White's answer explaining the logical reads reported on the global temp table




          Generally, logical reads are reported for the target table when the
          insert is not minimally logged.



          These logical reads are associated with finding a place in the
          existing structure to add the new rows. Minimally-logged inserts use
          the bulk-loading mechanism, which allocates whole new pages/extents
          (and so does not need to read the target structure in the same way).






          Conclusion



          The conclusion being that the INSERT INTO is not able to use minimal logging, resulting in logging every inserted row individually in the log file of tempdb when used in combination with a global temp table / normal table.
          Whereas the local temp table/ SELECT INTO/ INSERT INTO ... WITH(TABLOCK) is able to use minimal logging.






          share|improve this answer


























          • @PaulWhite I did not know that that was the explanation for it! Thanks for the feedback, will definitely add that to the answer, thanks!

            – Randi Vertongen
            11 mins ago


















          3














          Minimal logging is not being used when using INSERT INTO and global temp tables



          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using INSERT INTO



          INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          When running SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL) while the above query is executing, ~1M rows are returned.



          enter image description here



          One LOP_INSERT_ROW operation for each row + other
          log data.





          The same insert on a local temp table



          INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          Only going up to 700 rows returned by SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL)



          enter image description here



          Minimal logging





          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using SELECT INTO



          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          enter image description here



          SELECT INTO a global temp table with 10k records



          SELECT s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1;


          Time and IO Statistics



          SQL Server parse and compile time: 
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          SQL Server Execution Times:
          CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 10 ms.
          SQL Server parse and compile time:
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.




          Based on this blogpost we can add TABLOCK to initiate minimal logging on a heap table



          INSERT INTO ##t1 WITH(TABLOCK) (r)
          SELECT s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1


          Low logical reads



          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          (10000 rows affected)




          Part of an answer by @PaulWhite on how to achieve minimal logging on temporary tables




          No. Local temporary tables (#temp) are private to the creating
          session, so a table lock hint is not required. A table lock hint would
          be required for a global temporary table (##temp) or a regular table
          (dbo.temp) created in tempdb, because these can be accessed from
          multiple sessions.




          Creating a regular table to test this:



          CREATE TABLE dbo.bla
          (
          r int NOT NULL
          );


          Filling it up with 1M records



          INSERT INTO bla 
          SELECT top(1000000)s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          >1M logical reads on this table



          Table 's1'. Scan count 17, logical reads 155, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'bla'. Scan count 0, logical reads 1001607, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.




          Paul White's answer explaining the logical reads reported on the global temp table




          Generally, logical reads are reported for the target table when the
          insert is not minimally logged.



          These logical reads are associated with finding a place in the
          existing structure to add the new rows. Minimally-logged inserts use
          the bulk-loading mechanism, which allocates whole new pages/extents
          (and so does not need to read the target structure in the same way).






          Conclusion



          The conclusion being that the INSERT INTO is not able to use minimal logging, resulting in logging every inserted row individually in the log file of tempdb when used in combination with a global temp table / normal table.
          Whereas the local temp table/ SELECT INTO/ INSERT INTO ... WITH(TABLOCK) is able to use minimal logging.






          share|improve this answer


























          • @PaulWhite I did not know that that was the explanation for it! Thanks for the feedback, will definitely add that to the answer, thanks!

            – Randi Vertongen
            11 mins ago
















          3












          3








          3







          Minimal logging is not being used when using INSERT INTO and global temp tables



          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using INSERT INTO



          INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          When running SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL) while the above query is executing, ~1M rows are returned.



          enter image description here



          One LOP_INSERT_ROW operation for each row + other
          log data.





          The same insert on a local temp table



          INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          Only going up to 700 rows returned by SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL)



          enter image description here



          Minimal logging





          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using SELECT INTO



          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          enter image description here



          SELECT INTO a global temp table with 10k records



          SELECT s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1;


          Time and IO Statistics



          SQL Server parse and compile time: 
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          SQL Server Execution Times:
          CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 10 ms.
          SQL Server parse and compile time:
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.




          Based on this blogpost we can add TABLOCK to initiate minimal logging on a heap table



          INSERT INTO ##t1 WITH(TABLOCK) (r)
          SELECT s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1


          Low logical reads



          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          (10000 rows affected)




          Part of an answer by @PaulWhite on how to achieve minimal logging on temporary tables




          No. Local temporary tables (#temp) are private to the creating
          session, so a table lock hint is not required. A table lock hint would
          be required for a global temporary table (##temp) or a regular table
          (dbo.temp) created in tempdb, because these can be accessed from
          multiple sessions.




          Creating a regular table to test this:



          CREATE TABLE dbo.bla
          (
          r int NOT NULL
          );


          Filling it up with 1M records



          INSERT INTO bla 
          SELECT top(1000000)s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          >1M logical reads on this table



          Table 's1'. Scan count 17, logical reads 155, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'bla'. Scan count 0, logical reads 1001607, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.




          Paul White's answer explaining the logical reads reported on the global temp table




          Generally, logical reads are reported for the target table when the
          insert is not minimally logged.



          These logical reads are associated with finding a place in the
          existing structure to add the new rows. Minimally-logged inserts use
          the bulk-loading mechanism, which allocates whole new pages/extents
          (and so does not need to read the target structure in the same way).






          Conclusion



          The conclusion being that the INSERT INTO is not able to use minimal logging, resulting in logging every inserted row individually in the log file of tempdb when used in combination with a global temp table / normal table.
          Whereas the local temp table/ SELECT INTO/ INSERT INTO ... WITH(TABLOCK) is able to use minimal logging.






          share|improve this answer















          Minimal logging is not being used when using INSERT INTO and global temp tables



          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using INSERT INTO



          INSERT INTO ##t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          When running SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL) while the above query is executing, ~1M rows are returned.



          enter image description here



          One LOP_INSERT_ROW operation for each row + other
          log data.





          The same insert on a local temp table



          INSERT INTO #t1 (r)
          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          Only going up to 700 rows returned by SELECT * FROM fn_dblog(NULL, NULL)



          enter image description here



          Minimal logging





          Inserting one million rows in a global temp table by using SELECT INTO



          SELECT top(1000000) s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          enter image description here



          SELECT INTO a global temp table with 10k records



          SELECT s1.r
          INTO ##t2
          FROM dbo.s1;


          Time and IO Statistics



          SQL Server parse and compile time: 
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          SQL Server Execution Times:
          CPU time = 16 ms, elapsed time = 10 ms.
          SQL Server parse and compile time:
          CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.




          Based on this blogpost we can add TABLOCK to initiate minimal logging on a heap table



          INSERT INTO ##t1 WITH(TABLOCK) (r)
          SELECT s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1


          Low logical reads



          Table 's1'. Scan count 1, logical reads 19, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

          (10000 rows affected)




          Part of an answer by @PaulWhite on how to achieve minimal logging on temporary tables




          No. Local temporary tables (#temp) are private to the creating
          session, so a table lock hint is not required. A table lock hint would
          be required for a global temporary table (##temp) or a regular table
          (dbo.temp) created in tempdb, because these can be accessed from
          multiple sessions.




          Creating a regular table to test this:



          CREATE TABLE dbo.bla
          (
          r int NOT NULL
          );


          Filling it up with 1M records



          INSERT INTO bla 
          SELECT top(1000000)s1.r
          FROM dbo.s1
          CROSS APPLY dbo.s1 S2;


          >1M logical reads on this table



          Table 's1'. Scan count 17, logical reads 155, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'bla'. Scan count 0, logical reads 1001607, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
          Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.




          Paul White's answer explaining the logical reads reported on the global temp table




          Generally, logical reads are reported for the target table when the
          insert is not minimally logged.



          These logical reads are associated with finding a place in the
          existing structure to add the new rows. Minimally-logged inserts use
          the bulk-loading mechanism, which allocates whole new pages/extents
          (and so does not need to read the target structure in the same way).






          Conclusion



          The conclusion being that the INSERT INTO is not able to use minimal logging, resulting in logging every inserted row individually in the log file of tempdb when used in combination with a global temp table / normal table.
          Whereas the local temp table/ SELECT INTO/ INSERT INTO ... WITH(TABLOCK) is able to use minimal logging.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 12 mins ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          Randi VertongenRandi Vertongen

          4,191924




          4,191924













          • @PaulWhite I did not know that that was the explanation for it! Thanks for the feedback, will definitely add that to the answer, thanks!

            – Randi Vertongen
            11 mins ago





















          • @PaulWhite I did not know that that was the explanation for it! Thanks for the feedback, will definitely add that to the answer, thanks!

            – Randi Vertongen
            11 mins ago



















          @PaulWhite I did not know that that was the explanation for it! Thanks for the feedback, will definitely add that to the answer, thanks!

          – Randi Vertongen
          11 mins ago







          @PaulWhite I did not know that that was the explanation for it! Thanks for the feedback, will definitely add that to the answer, thanks!

          – Randi Vertongen
          11 mins ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233689%2flogical-reads-on-global-temp-table-but-not-on-session-level-temp-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Щит и меч (фильм) Содержание Названия серий | Сюжет |...

          is 'sed' thread safeWhat should someone know about using Python scripts in the shell?Nexenta bash script uses...

          Meter-Bus Содержание Параметры шины | Стандартизация |...