Prove that a horizontal asymptote can never be crossedProve that the quotient of a nonzero rational number...
What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections?
Everything Bob says is false. How does he get people to trust him?
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?
What is difference between behavior and behaviour
Ways to speed up user implemented RK4
What does this 7 mean above the f flat
Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?
apt-get update is failing in debian
Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?
Centering an <li> element without taking bullet point into account
Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file
Using parameter substitution on a Bash array
Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?
Why does John Bercow say “unlock” after reading out the results of a vote?
Modify casing of marked letters
At which point does a character regain all their Hit Dice?
Valid Badminton Score?
Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle
Your magic is very sketchy
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Is this Spell Mimic feat balanced?
Prove that a horizontal asymptote can never be crossed
Prove that the quotient of a nonzero rational number and an irrational number is irrationalWhy do we need to prove a fraction can always be written in lowest terms?How can I deduce that this is always an integer?Proving Algebraically that this Rational Function Never Crosses its Horizontal AsymptoteProve With Vectors That a Parallelogram's Diagonals BisectProof verification: $Tinmathcal{L}(mathcal{P}(bf{R}))$ being injective and $deg Tpleqdeg p$ implies $T$ is surjective and $deg Tp=deg p$Proof By Induction: Summation of PolynomialIf gcd(a, b) = 1 and a | bc. Prove that a | c.Proof Verification - Elementary proof that $sqrt3$ is irrationalProof that for any real number $x$, $-|x| leq x leq |x|$. Is my proof too good to be true?
$begingroup$
This is a lot simpler of a problem than others posted here, but I was bored in class and decided to work out why a horizontal asymptote exists. Bear in mind that I am still fairly low on the “math ladder.”
So to accomplish this I worked off of one example equation that could be made into a general case later on, with the chosen one being $$y = frac{2x+6}{x+1}$$
Now, proving any vertical asymptote is simple (by definition it creates a “divide by zero” error when plugged into the equation), but a horizontal asymptote “proof” requires some manipulation. So, doing a little shuffling of the equation to isolate the variables slightly... $$y = frac{x(2+frac{6}{x})}{x(1+frac{1}{x})}$$
The $x$ on the top and bottom of the function will cancel out, and we are left with $$y = frac{2+frac{6}{x}}{1+frac{1}{x}}$$
With a little more rearranging by multiplying the function by the denominator, you get $$yleft(1+frac{1}{x}right) = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
You likely see what is wrong with this, but let’s distribute the $y$ to simplify further: $$y+frac{y}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
Now everything is ready to plug in. Say that there is a value that corresponds to $y = 2$ (the horizontal asymptote of this graph, found by dividing $p$ by $q$, or $2/1$, because $operatorname{deg} p = operatorname{deg} q$). Then the equation should be able to be used to find this value. However, if $2$ is substituted for $y$...
$$2+frac{2}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
$$frac{2}{x} = frac{6}{x}$$
$$2 = 6$$
Therefore $y$ cannot be equal to $2$. I believe that is referred to as a “proof by contradiction” but correct me if I’m wrong. Or if the whole proof is wrong, for that matter. Anyways, I’d love to generalize this but I’m hitting a roadblock due to not knowing of a comprehensive standard form for all rational expressions. I’ve tried it on numerous equations but I’m not sure how to explain what I think is going on. Every time you plug the asymptote into the reworked equation you end up with a contradiction, and any other numbers (minus holes) returns a value that can be found on the graph.
Can anyone help with this? I just felt like sharing this little 10 minute project because it intrigued me, but being able to generalize it to see what’s going on between each variable and coefficient (specifically, how/why the leading terms and degrees affect the H.A) would be helpful for overall understanding of the topic. Thanks!
proof-verification
New contributor
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This is a lot simpler of a problem than others posted here, but I was bored in class and decided to work out why a horizontal asymptote exists. Bear in mind that I am still fairly low on the “math ladder.”
So to accomplish this I worked off of one example equation that could be made into a general case later on, with the chosen one being $$y = frac{2x+6}{x+1}$$
Now, proving any vertical asymptote is simple (by definition it creates a “divide by zero” error when plugged into the equation), but a horizontal asymptote “proof” requires some manipulation. So, doing a little shuffling of the equation to isolate the variables slightly... $$y = frac{x(2+frac{6}{x})}{x(1+frac{1}{x})}$$
The $x$ on the top and bottom of the function will cancel out, and we are left with $$y = frac{2+frac{6}{x}}{1+frac{1}{x}}$$
With a little more rearranging by multiplying the function by the denominator, you get $$yleft(1+frac{1}{x}right) = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
You likely see what is wrong with this, but let’s distribute the $y$ to simplify further: $$y+frac{y}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
Now everything is ready to plug in. Say that there is a value that corresponds to $y = 2$ (the horizontal asymptote of this graph, found by dividing $p$ by $q$, or $2/1$, because $operatorname{deg} p = operatorname{deg} q$). Then the equation should be able to be used to find this value. However, if $2$ is substituted for $y$...
$$2+frac{2}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
$$frac{2}{x} = frac{6}{x}$$
$$2 = 6$$
Therefore $y$ cannot be equal to $2$. I believe that is referred to as a “proof by contradiction” but correct me if I’m wrong. Or if the whole proof is wrong, for that matter. Anyways, I’d love to generalize this but I’m hitting a roadblock due to not knowing of a comprehensive standard form for all rational expressions. I’ve tried it on numerous equations but I’m not sure how to explain what I think is going on. Every time you plug the asymptote into the reworked equation you end up with a contradiction, and any other numbers (minus holes) returns a value that can be found on the graph.
Can anyone help with this? I just felt like sharing this little 10 minute project because it intrigued me, but being able to generalize it to see what’s going on between each variable and coefficient (specifically, how/why the leading terms and degrees affect the H.A) would be helpful for overall understanding of the topic. Thanks!
proof-verification
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This is a lot simpler of a problem than others posted here, but I was bored in class and decided to work out why a horizontal asymptote exists. Bear in mind that I am still fairly low on the “math ladder.”
So to accomplish this I worked off of one example equation that could be made into a general case later on, with the chosen one being $$y = frac{2x+6}{x+1}$$
Now, proving any vertical asymptote is simple (by definition it creates a “divide by zero” error when plugged into the equation), but a horizontal asymptote “proof” requires some manipulation. So, doing a little shuffling of the equation to isolate the variables slightly... $$y = frac{x(2+frac{6}{x})}{x(1+frac{1}{x})}$$
The $x$ on the top and bottom of the function will cancel out, and we are left with $$y = frac{2+frac{6}{x}}{1+frac{1}{x}}$$
With a little more rearranging by multiplying the function by the denominator, you get $$yleft(1+frac{1}{x}right) = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
You likely see what is wrong with this, but let’s distribute the $y$ to simplify further: $$y+frac{y}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
Now everything is ready to plug in. Say that there is a value that corresponds to $y = 2$ (the horizontal asymptote of this graph, found by dividing $p$ by $q$, or $2/1$, because $operatorname{deg} p = operatorname{deg} q$). Then the equation should be able to be used to find this value. However, if $2$ is substituted for $y$...
$$2+frac{2}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
$$frac{2}{x} = frac{6}{x}$$
$$2 = 6$$
Therefore $y$ cannot be equal to $2$. I believe that is referred to as a “proof by contradiction” but correct me if I’m wrong. Or if the whole proof is wrong, for that matter. Anyways, I’d love to generalize this but I’m hitting a roadblock due to not knowing of a comprehensive standard form for all rational expressions. I’ve tried it on numerous equations but I’m not sure how to explain what I think is going on. Every time you plug the asymptote into the reworked equation you end up with a contradiction, and any other numbers (minus holes) returns a value that can be found on the graph.
Can anyone help with this? I just felt like sharing this little 10 minute project because it intrigued me, but being able to generalize it to see what’s going on between each variable and coefficient (specifically, how/why the leading terms and degrees affect the H.A) would be helpful for overall understanding of the topic. Thanks!
proof-verification
New contributor
$endgroup$
This is a lot simpler of a problem than others posted here, but I was bored in class and decided to work out why a horizontal asymptote exists. Bear in mind that I am still fairly low on the “math ladder.”
So to accomplish this I worked off of one example equation that could be made into a general case later on, with the chosen one being $$y = frac{2x+6}{x+1}$$
Now, proving any vertical asymptote is simple (by definition it creates a “divide by zero” error when plugged into the equation), but a horizontal asymptote “proof” requires some manipulation. So, doing a little shuffling of the equation to isolate the variables slightly... $$y = frac{x(2+frac{6}{x})}{x(1+frac{1}{x})}$$
The $x$ on the top and bottom of the function will cancel out, and we are left with $$y = frac{2+frac{6}{x}}{1+frac{1}{x}}$$
With a little more rearranging by multiplying the function by the denominator, you get $$yleft(1+frac{1}{x}right) = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
You likely see what is wrong with this, but let’s distribute the $y$ to simplify further: $$y+frac{y}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
Now everything is ready to plug in. Say that there is a value that corresponds to $y = 2$ (the horizontal asymptote of this graph, found by dividing $p$ by $q$, or $2/1$, because $operatorname{deg} p = operatorname{deg} q$). Then the equation should be able to be used to find this value. However, if $2$ is substituted for $y$...
$$2+frac{2}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
$$frac{2}{x} = frac{6}{x}$$
$$2 = 6$$
Therefore $y$ cannot be equal to $2$. I believe that is referred to as a “proof by contradiction” but correct me if I’m wrong. Or if the whole proof is wrong, for that matter. Anyways, I’d love to generalize this but I’m hitting a roadblock due to not knowing of a comprehensive standard form for all rational expressions. I’ve tried it on numerous equations but I’m not sure how to explain what I think is going on. Every time you plug the asymptote into the reworked equation you end up with a contradiction, and any other numbers (minus holes) returns a value that can be found on the graph.
Can anyone help with this? I just felt like sharing this little 10 minute project because it intrigued me, but being able to generalize it to see what’s going on between each variable and coefficient (specifically, how/why the leading terms and degrees affect the H.A) would be helpful for overall understanding of the topic. Thanks!
proof-verification
proof-verification
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Robert Howard
2,2783935
2,2783935
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
Jake RJake R
162
162
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement
There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$
which is absurd.
But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$
For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$
But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.
Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?
Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.
So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164121%2fprove-that-a-horizontal-asymptote-can-never-be-crossed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement
There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$
which is absurd.
But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$
For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$
But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.
Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?
Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement
There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$
which is absurd.
But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$
For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$
But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.
Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?
Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement
There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$
which is absurd.
But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$
For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$
But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.
Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?
Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.
$endgroup$
You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement
There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$
then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$
which is absurd.
But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$
For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$
But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.
Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?
Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
QuokaQuoka
1,538316
1,538316
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.
So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.
So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.
So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.
$endgroup$
Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.
So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.
answered 1 hour ago
AndreiAndrei
13.2k21230
13.2k21230
add a comment |
add a comment |
Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164121%2fprove-that-a-horizontal-asymptote-can-never-be-crossed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
1 hour ago