Why does the Binomial Theorem use combinations and not permutations for its coefficients?How do I determine...

Why are `&array` and `array` pointing to the same address?

How to scroll to next div using Javascript?

What is the difference between crontab -e and nano /etc/crontab?

Is it ethical to apply for a job on someone's behalf?

Manager has noticed coworker's excessive breaks. Should I warn him?

How can a kingdom keep the secret of a missing monarch from the public?

Why don't reads from /dev/zero count as I/O?

Why is Bernie Sanders maximum accepted donation on actblue $5600?

What did Putin say about a US deep state in his state-of-the-nation speech; what has he said in the past?

How bad is a Computer Science course that doesn't teach Design Patterns?

Does changing "sa" password require a SQL restart (in mixed mode)?

Is corrosion inhibitor paste conductive?

Ramanujan's radical and how we define an infinite nested radical

How to play songs that contain one guitar when we have two or more guitarists?

How many copper coins fit inside a cubic foot?

Can you wish for more wishes from an Efreeti bound to service via an Efreeti Bottle?

Why would you use 2 alternate layout buttons instead of 1, when only one can be selected at once

Is layered encryption more secure than long passwords?

In a world with multiracial creatures, what word can be used instead of mankind?

How can I make my enemies feel real and make combat more engaging?

Are encryption algorithms with fixed-point free permutations inherently flawed?

What if you do not believe in the project benefits?

How to know if I am a 'Real Developer'

Exploding Numbers



Why does the Binomial Theorem use combinations and not permutations for its coefficients?


How do I determine the possible number of combinations of two ordered sets?Binomial Coefficients in the Binomial Theorem - Why Does It Work QuestionHelp with binomial coefficients using binomial theoremHow do we express binomial coefficients as linear expressions?Find a binomial coefficient equal to ${nchoose k} + 3 {nchoose k-1} + 3{n choose k-2} + {nchoose k-3}$Intuitive explanation of extended binomial coefficientWhy does the binomial theorem for negative numbers never terminateSuming combinations in binomial theorempermutations with repeating symbols and binomial coefficientThe number of ways in which $n$ distinct items can be divided among $r$ groups













2












$begingroup$


I have been trying to understand the Binomial Theorem formula. I can see that it works.



What I don’t understand is how or why using combinations finds the coefficients.




What I mean is, isn’t each coefficient actually a permutation?




In the sense, that a combination isn’t concerned with the order. Yet the coefficient seems to reflect the ways a selection of items can be ordered.



It seems like a contradiction.



A simple explanation would be greatly appreciated. As I am not a mathematician.



Many thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Short answer: commutativity (and I guess associativity) of multiplication
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    6 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


I have been trying to understand the Binomial Theorem formula. I can see that it works.



What I don’t understand is how or why using combinations finds the coefficients.




What I mean is, isn’t each coefficient actually a permutation?




In the sense, that a combination isn’t concerned with the order. Yet the coefficient seems to reflect the ways a selection of items can be ordered.



It seems like a contradiction.



A simple explanation would be greatly appreciated. As I am not a mathematician.



Many thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Short answer: commutativity (and I guess associativity) of multiplication
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    6 hours ago














2












2








2


2



$begingroup$


I have been trying to understand the Binomial Theorem formula. I can see that it works.



What I don’t understand is how or why using combinations finds the coefficients.




What I mean is, isn’t each coefficient actually a permutation?




In the sense, that a combination isn’t concerned with the order. Yet the coefficient seems to reflect the ways a selection of items can be ordered.



It seems like a contradiction.



A simple explanation would be greatly appreciated. As I am not a mathematician.



Many thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have been trying to understand the Binomial Theorem formula. I can see that it works.



What I don’t understand is how or why using combinations finds the coefficients.




What I mean is, isn’t each coefficient actually a permutation?




In the sense, that a combination isn’t concerned with the order. Yet the coefficient seems to reflect the ways a selection of items can be ordered.



It seems like a contradiction.



A simple explanation would be greatly appreciated. As I am not a mathematician.



Many thanks.







binomial-coefficients binomial-theorem binomial-distribution






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Blue

48.5k870154




48.5k870154






New contributor




Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









JorJor

111




111




New contributor




Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Jor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Short answer: commutativity (and I guess associativity) of multiplication
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    6 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Short answer: commutativity (and I guess associativity) of multiplication
    $endgroup$
    – Brevan Ellefsen
    6 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Short answer: commutativity (and I guess associativity) of multiplication
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Short answer: commutativity (and I guess associativity) of multiplication
$endgroup$
– Brevan Ellefsen
6 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

The reason combinations come in can be seen in using a special example. The same logic applies in the general case but it becomes murkier through the abstraction.



Consider



$$(a+b)^3$$



If we were to multiply this out, and not group terms according to multiplication rules (for example, let $a^3$ remain as $aaa$ for the sake of our exercise), we see



$$(a+b)^3 = aaa + aab + aba + baa + abb + bab + bba + bbb$$



Notice that we can characterize the sum this way:



$$(a+b)^3 = (text{terms with 3 a's}) + (text{terms with 2 a's}) + (text{terms with 1 a}) + (text{terms with no a's})$$



(You can also do the same for $b$, the approach is equivalent.) Well, we see from our weird expansion that we have every possible sequence of length $3$ made up of only $a$'s and $b$'s. We also know some of these terms are going to group together, as, for example, $aba = aab = baa$.



So how many summands are actually equal? Well, since they all have the same length, two summands are equal if and only if they have the same number of $a$'s (or $b$'s, same thing). And we also know that every possible sequence of length $3$ and only $a$'s and $b$'s are here.



So we can conclude that



$$begin{align}
(text{# of terms with 3 a's}) &= binom{3}{3} = 1\
(text{# of terms with 2 a's}) &= binom{3}{2} = 3\
(text{# of terms with 1 a}) &= binom{3}{1} = 3\
(text{# of terms with no a's}) &= binom{3}{0} = 1
end{align}$$



Thus, we conclude:




  • There will only be one $aaa = a^3$ term

  • There will be $3$ $aba=aab=baa=a^2b$ terms.

  • There will be $3$ $abb = bab = abb = ab^2$ terms.

  • There will be $1$ $bbb=b^3$ term.


Thus,



$$(a+b)^3 = sum_{k=0}^3 binom{3}{k}a^k b^{3-k}$$



and in general, for positive integers $n$,



$$(a+b)^n = sum_{k=0}^n binom{n}{k}a^k b^{n-k}$$





In short, the reason we use combinations is because the order does not matter, because we will get terms like $aab, baa, bab$ which are all equal in the expansion. Since multiplication is a commutative operation over the real numbers, then, we can say they're equal. Thus, the number of terms of that "type" (characterized by how many $a$'s or $b$'s they have) is given precisely by the number of sequences of length $n$ ($n=3$ in our example), made of only $a$ and $b$, that has exactly $k$ $a$'s (or $b$'s).



Of course this all relies on the central premise that multiplication commutes in the reals and thus ensures that the order of the factors does not matter. That suggests that it does not always hold in situations where multiplication does not commute - for example, the multiplication of a type of numbers known as quaternions is not commutative, and thus the binomial theorem does not hold there as it does here (since there $ab$ need not equal $ba$).



The nature of this commutativity, or the lack of it, and the consequences of each is better divulged in a discussion on abstract algebra, and this tangent is long enough as it is.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    My way of seeing the binomial formula is the following. Suppose you want to compute
    $$
    (a+b)^n
    $$

    for some $ngeq 1$. Look at it in this way:
    $$
    underbrace{(a+b)cdot (a+b) cdot ldots cdot (a+b)}_{n text{terms}},
    $$

    with exactly $n$ multiplications. How do you obtain the result? Pick one term between $a$ or $b$ from each factor and multiply them together. So the result contains terms of the form $a^kb^{n-k}$ for $k=0,,ldots,n$: this means that you picked $k$ times $a$ and $n-k$ times $b$. How many choices do you have? You have $n$ "different" $a$'s and you have to count the number of ways to select $k$ of them. The order does not matter: this means that if you selected the same $a$'s in a different order, the would give exactly the same term in the result, thus you don't want to count them twice. This is why for each $k$ you have exactly $binom{n}{k}$ choices.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Jor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3121134%2fwhy-does-the-binomial-theorem-use-combinations-and-not-permutations-for-its-coef%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7












      $begingroup$

      The reason combinations come in can be seen in using a special example. The same logic applies in the general case but it becomes murkier through the abstraction.



      Consider



      $$(a+b)^3$$



      If we were to multiply this out, and not group terms according to multiplication rules (for example, let $a^3$ remain as $aaa$ for the sake of our exercise), we see



      $$(a+b)^3 = aaa + aab + aba + baa + abb + bab + bba + bbb$$



      Notice that we can characterize the sum this way:



      $$(a+b)^3 = (text{terms with 3 a's}) + (text{terms with 2 a's}) + (text{terms with 1 a}) + (text{terms with no a's})$$



      (You can also do the same for $b$, the approach is equivalent.) Well, we see from our weird expansion that we have every possible sequence of length $3$ made up of only $a$'s and $b$'s. We also know some of these terms are going to group together, as, for example, $aba = aab = baa$.



      So how many summands are actually equal? Well, since they all have the same length, two summands are equal if and only if they have the same number of $a$'s (or $b$'s, same thing). And we also know that every possible sequence of length $3$ and only $a$'s and $b$'s are here.



      So we can conclude that



      $$begin{align}
      (text{# of terms with 3 a's}) &= binom{3}{3} = 1\
      (text{# of terms with 2 a's}) &= binom{3}{2} = 3\
      (text{# of terms with 1 a}) &= binom{3}{1} = 3\
      (text{# of terms with no a's}) &= binom{3}{0} = 1
      end{align}$$



      Thus, we conclude:




      • There will only be one $aaa = a^3$ term

      • There will be $3$ $aba=aab=baa=a^2b$ terms.

      • There will be $3$ $abb = bab = abb = ab^2$ terms.

      • There will be $1$ $bbb=b^3$ term.


      Thus,



      $$(a+b)^3 = sum_{k=0}^3 binom{3}{k}a^k b^{3-k}$$



      and in general, for positive integers $n$,



      $$(a+b)^n = sum_{k=0}^n binom{n}{k}a^k b^{n-k}$$





      In short, the reason we use combinations is because the order does not matter, because we will get terms like $aab, baa, bab$ which are all equal in the expansion. Since multiplication is a commutative operation over the real numbers, then, we can say they're equal. Thus, the number of terms of that "type" (characterized by how many $a$'s or $b$'s they have) is given precisely by the number of sequences of length $n$ ($n=3$ in our example), made of only $a$ and $b$, that has exactly $k$ $a$'s (or $b$'s).



      Of course this all relies on the central premise that multiplication commutes in the reals and thus ensures that the order of the factors does not matter. That suggests that it does not always hold in situations where multiplication does not commute - for example, the multiplication of a type of numbers known as quaternions is not commutative, and thus the binomial theorem does not hold there as it does here (since there $ab$ need not equal $ba$).



      The nature of this commutativity, or the lack of it, and the consequences of each is better divulged in a discussion on abstract algebra, and this tangent is long enough as it is.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        7












        $begingroup$

        The reason combinations come in can be seen in using a special example. The same logic applies in the general case but it becomes murkier through the abstraction.



        Consider



        $$(a+b)^3$$



        If we were to multiply this out, and not group terms according to multiplication rules (for example, let $a^3$ remain as $aaa$ for the sake of our exercise), we see



        $$(a+b)^3 = aaa + aab + aba + baa + abb + bab + bba + bbb$$



        Notice that we can characterize the sum this way:



        $$(a+b)^3 = (text{terms with 3 a's}) + (text{terms with 2 a's}) + (text{terms with 1 a}) + (text{terms with no a's})$$



        (You can also do the same for $b$, the approach is equivalent.) Well, we see from our weird expansion that we have every possible sequence of length $3$ made up of only $a$'s and $b$'s. We also know some of these terms are going to group together, as, for example, $aba = aab = baa$.



        So how many summands are actually equal? Well, since they all have the same length, two summands are equal if and only if they have the same number of $a$'s (or $b$'s, same thing). And we also know that every possible sequence of length $3$ and only $a$'s and $b$'s are here.



        So we can conclude that



        $$begin{align}
        (text{# of terms with 3 a's}) &= binom{3}{3} = 1\
        (text{# of terms with 2 a's}) &= binom{3}{2} = 3\
        (text{# of terms with 1 a}) &= binom{3}{1} = 3\
        (text{# of terms with no a's}) &= binom{3}{0} = 1
        end{align}$$



        Thus, we conclude:




        • There will only be one $aaa = a^3$ term

        • There will be $3$ $aba=aab=baa=a^2b$ terms.

        • There will be $3$ $abb = bab = abb = ab^2$ terms.

        • There will be $1$ $bbb=b^3$ term.


        Thus,



        $$(a+b)^3 = sum_{k=0}^3 binom{3}{k}a^k b^{3-k}$$



        and in general, for positive integers $n$,



        $$(a+b)^n = sum_{k=0}^n binom{n}{k}a^k b^{n-k}$$





        In short, the reason we use combinations is because the order does not matter, because we will get terms like $aab, baa, bab$ which are all equal in the expansion. Since multiplication is a commutative operation over the real numbers, then, we can say they're equal. Thus, the number of terms of that "type" (characterized by how many $a$'s or $b$'s they have) is given precisely by the number of sequences of length $n$ ($n=3$ in our example), made of only $a$ and $b$, that has exactly $k$ $a$'s (or $b$'s).



        Of course this all relies on the central premise that multiplication commutes in the reals and thus ensures that the order of the factors does not matter. That suggests that it does not always hold in situations where multiplication does not commute - for example, the multiplication of a type of numbers known as quaternions is not commutative, and thus the binomial theorem does not hold there as it does here (since there $ab$ need not equal $ba$).



        The nature of this commutativity, or the lack of it, and the consequences of each is better divulged in a discussion on abstract algebra, and this tangent is long enough as it is.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          The reason combinations come in can be seen in using a special example. The same logic applies in the general case but it becomes murkier through the abstraction.



          Consider



          $$(a+b)^3$$



          If we were to multiply this out, and not group terms according to multiplication rules (for example, let $a^3$ remain as $aaa$ for the sake of our exercise), we see



          $$(a+b)^3 = aaa + aab + aba + baa + abb + bab + bba + bbb$$



          Notice that we can characterize the sum this way:



          $$(a+b)^3 = (text{terms with 3 a's}) + (text{terms with 2 a's}) + (text{terms with 1 a}) + (text{terms with no a's})$$



          (You can also do the same for $b$, the approach is equivalent.) Well, we see from our weird expansion that we have every possible sequence of length $3$ made up of only $a$'s and $b$'s. We also know some of these terms are going to group together, as, for example, $aba = aab = baa$.



          So how many summands are actually equal? Well, since they all have the same length, two summands are equal if and only if they have the same number of $a$'s (or $b$'s, same thing). And we also know that every possible sequence of length $3$ and only $a$'s and $b$'s are here.



          So we can conclude that



          $$begin{align}
          (text{# of terms with 3 a's}) &= binom{3}{3} = 1\
          (text{# of terms with 2 a's}) &= binom{3}{2} = 3\
          (text{# of terms with 1 a}) &= binom{3}{1} = 3\
          (text{# of terms with no a's}) &= binom{3}{0} = 1
          end{align}$$



          Thus, we conclude:




          • There will only be one $aaa = a^3$ term

          • There will be $3$ $aba=aab=baa=a^2b$ terms.

          • There will be $3$ $abb = bab = abb = ab^2$ terms.

          • There will be $1$ $bbb=b^3$ term.


          Thus,



          $$(a+b)^3 = sum_{k=0}^3 binom{3}{k}a^k b^{3-k}$$



          and in general, for positive integers $n$,



          $$(a+b)^n = sum_{k=0}^n binom{n}{k}a^k b^{n-k}$$





          In short, the reason we use combinations is because the order does not matter, because we will get terms like $aab, baa, bab$ which are all equal in the expansion. Since multiplication is a commutative operation over the real numbers, then, we can say they're equal. Thus, the number of terms of that "type" (characterized by how many $a$'s or $b$'s they have) is given precisely by the number of sequences of length $n$ ($n=3$ in our example), made of only $a$ and $b$, that has exactly $k$ $a$'s (or $b$'s).



          Of course this all relies on the central premise that multiplication commutes in the reals and thus ensures that the order of the factors does not matter. That suggests that it does not always hold in situations where multiplication does not commute - for example, the multiplication of a type of numbers known as quaternions is not commutative, and thus the binomial theorem does not hold there as it does here (since there $ab$ need not equal $ba$).



          The nature of this commutativity, or the lack of it, and the consequences of each is better divulged in a discussion on abstract algebra, and this tangent is long enough as it is.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The reason combinations come in can be seen in using a special example. The same logic applies in the general case but it becomes murkier through the abstraction.



          Consider



          $$(a+b)^3$$



          If we were to multiply this out, and not group terms according to multiplication rules (for example, let $a^3$ remain as $aaa$ for the sake of our exercise), we see



          $$(a+b)^3 = aaa + aab + aba + baa + abb + bab + bba + bbb$$



          Notice that we can characterize the sum this way:



          $$(a+b)^3 = (text{terms with 3 a's}) + (text{terms with 2 a's}) + (text{terms with 1 a}) + (text{terms with no a's})$$



          (You can also do the same for $b$, the approach is equivalent.) Well, we see from our weird expansion that we have every possible sequence of length $3$ made up of only $a$'s and $b$'s. We also know some of these terms are going to group together, as, for example, $aba = aab = baa$.



          So how many summands are actually equal? Well, since they all have the same length, two summands are equal if and only if they have the same number of $a$'s (or $b$'s, same thing). And we also know that every possible sequence of length $3$ and only $a$'s and $b$'s are here.



          So we can conclude that



          $$begin{align}
          (text{# of terms with 3 a's}) &= binom{3}{3} = 1\
          (text{# of terms with 2 a's}) &= binom{3}{2} = 3\
          (text{# of terms with 1 a}) &= binom{3}{1} = 3\
          (text{# of terms with no a's}) &= binom{3}{0} = 1
          end{align}$$



          Thus, we conclude:




          • There will only be one $aaa = a^3$ term

          • There will be $3$ $aba=aab=baa=a^2b$ terms.

          • There will be $3$ $abb = bab = abb = ab^2$ terms.

          • There will be $1$ $bbb=b^3$ term.


          Thus,



          $$(a+b)^3 = sum_{k=0}^3 binom{3}{k}a^k b^{3-k}$$



          and in general, for positive integers $n$,



          $$(a+b)^n = sum_{k=0}^n binom{n}{k}a^k b^{n-k}$$





          In short, the reason we use combinations is because the order does not matter, because we will get terms like $aab, baa, bab$ which are all equal in the expansion. Since multiplication is a commutative operation over the real numbers, then, we can say they're equal. Thus, the number of terms of that "type" (characterized by how many $a$'s or $b$'s they have) is given precisely by the number of sequences of length $n$ ($n=3$ in our example), made of only $a$ and $b$, that has exactly $k$ $a$'s (or $b$'s).



          Of course this all relies on the central premise that multiplication commutes in the reals and thus ensures that the order of the factors does not matter. That suggests that it does not always hold in situations where multiplication does not commute - for example, the multiplication of a type of numbers known as quaternions is not commutative, and thus the binomial theorem does not hold there as it does here (since there $ab$ need not equal $ba$).



          The nature of this commutativity, or the lack of it, and the consequences of each is better divulged in a discussion on abstract algebra, and this tangent is long enough as it is.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 7 hours ago









          Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

          6,53811237




          6,53811237























              0












              $begingroup$

              My way of seeing the binomial formula is the following. Suppose you want to compute
              $$
              (a+b)^n
              $$

              for some $ngeq 1$. Look at it in this way:
              $$
              underbrace{(a+b)cdot (a+b) cdot ldots cdot (a+b)}_{n text{terms}},
              $$

              with exactly $n$ multiplications. How do you obtain the result? Pick one term between $a$ or $b$ from each factor and multiply them together. So the result contains terms of the form $a^kb^{n-k}$ for $k=0,,ldots,n$: this means that you picked $k$ times $a$ and $n-k$ times $b$. How many choices do you have? You have $n$ "different" $a$'s and you have to count the number of ways to select $k$ of them. The order does not matter: this means that if you selected the same $a$'s in a different order, the would give exactly the same term in the result, thus you don't want to count them twice. This is why for each $k$ you have exactly $binom{n}{k}$ choices.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                My way of seeing the binomial formula is the following. Suppose you want to compute
                $$
                (a+b)^n
                $$

                for some $ngeq 1$. Look at it in this way:
                $$
                underbrace{(a+b)cdot (a+b) cdot ldots cdot (a+b)}_{n text{terms}},
                $$

                with exactly $n$ multiplications. How do you obtain the result? Pick one term between $a$ or $b$ from each factor and multiply them together. So the result contains terms of the form $a^kb^{n-k}$ for $k=0,,ldots,n$: this means that you picked $k$ times $a$ and $n-k$ times $b$. How many choices do you have? You have $n$ "different" $a$'s and you have to count the number of ways to select $k$ of them. The order does not matter: this means that if you selected the same $a$'s in a different order, the would give exactly the same term in the result, thus you don't want to count them twice. This is why for each $k$ you have exactly $binom{n}{k}$ choices.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  My way of seeing the binomial formula is the following. Suppose you want to compute
                  $$
                  (a+b)^n
                  $$

                  for some $ngeq 1$. Look at it in this way:
                  $$
                  underbrace{(a+b)cdot (a+b) cdot ldots cdot (a+b)}_{n text{terms}},
                  $$

                  with exactly $n$ multiplications. How do you obtain the result? Pick one term between $a$ or $b$ from each factor and multiply them together. So the result contains terms of the form $a^kb^{n-k}$ for $k=0,,ldots,n$: this means that you picked $k$ times $a$ and $n-k$ times $b$. How many choices do you have? You have $n$ "different" $a$'s and you have to count the number of ways to select $k$ of them. The order does not matter: this means that if you selected the same $a$'s in a different order, the would give exactly the same term in the result, thus you don't want to count them twice. This is why for each $k$ you have exactly $binom{n}{k}$ choices.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  My way of seeing the binomial formula is the following. Suppose you want to compute
                  $$
                  (a+b)^n
                  $$

                  for some $ngeq 1$. Look at it in this way:
                  $$
                  underbrace{(a+b)cdot (a+b) cdot ldots cdot (a+b)}_{n text{terms}},
                  $$

                  with exactly $n$ multiplications. How do you obtain the result? Pick one term between $a$ or $b$ from each factor and multiply them together. So the result contains terms of the form $a^kb^{n-k}$ for $k=0,,ldots,n$: this means that you picked $k$ times $a$ and $n-k$ times $b$. How many choices do you have? You have $n$ "different" $a$'s and you have to count the number of ways to select $k$ of them. The order does not matter: this means that if you selected the same $a$'s in a different order, the would give exactly the same term in the result, thus you don't want to count them twice. This is why for each $k$ you have exactly $binom{n}{k}$ choices.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 6 hours ago

























                  answered 6 hours ago









                  AlessioDVAlessioDV

                  31412




                  31412






















                      Jor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Jor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Jor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Jor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3121134%2fwhy-does-the-binomial-theorem-use-combinations-and-not-permutations-for-its-coef%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Щит и меч (фильм) Содержание Названия серий | Сюжет |...

                      is 'sed' thread safeWhat should someone know about using Python scripts in the shell?Nexenta bash script uses...

                      Meter-Bus Содержание Параметры шины | Стандартизация |...