Using Google Maps Coordinate System in QGIS?Transform from WGS84 to EPSG 3785 (google maps)How to load my CSV...
What are the purposes of autoencoders?
Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?
Is the U.S. Code copyrighted by the Government?
Multiplicative persistence
How could a planet have erratic days?
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
If infinitesimal transformations commute why dont the generators of the Lorentz group commute?
How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?
How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?
If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?
What does routing an IP address mean?
Must Legal Documents Be Siged In Standard Pen Colors?
Start making guitar arrangements
Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources
Did Swami Prabhupada reject Advaita?
Biological Blimps: Propulsion
Electoral considerations aside, what are potential benefits, for the US, of policy changes proposed by the tweet recognizing Golan annexation?
Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?
Closed-form expression for certain product
How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?
Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed
The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?
Why electric field inside a cavity of a non-conducting sphere not zero?
Store Credit Card Information in Password Manager?
Using Google Maps Coordinate System in QGIS?
Transform from WGS84 to EPSG 3785 (google maps)How to load my CSV file with WKT to QGISQGIS Georeferencer and Coordinate SystemsSearching closest region from Google Maps coordinatesCoordinate System Google Maps APIStretched QGIS Hexbin in Google mapsOpenLayers Google Satellite plugin datum errorDigitizing Tools error in QGISMapping GPS coordinate from Google Maps in QGISQGIS - Layers with CRS EPSG:3857 incompatible with Google street mapImporting google maps/bing points: which projection?What Datum is used by Google Maps?
I have some Points in Shapefile with BC Albers Coordinate Syetem and I need to Project them to Google Maps Lat and Long. I tried to do this by using
WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator EPSG: 3857
and
WGS84 EPSG: 4326
But none of them returning correct result! I believe there is Coordinate for Google Maps in ArcGIS as "Web Mercator" to do this but I couldn't find it in QGis.
What Coordinate should I use for Getting correct points X and Y on google map?
I also used EPSG:900913 Google Mercator
but when I tried to get X and Y coords through Geometry Tool/ Export add Geometry Columns I am getting numbers like :
Result using EPSG:3857:
qgis google-maps-api
|
show 2 more comments
I have some Points in Shapefile with BC Albers Coordinate Syetem and I need to Project them to Google Maps Lat and Long. I tried to do this by using
WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator EPSG: 3857
and
WGS84 EPSG: 4326
But none of them returning correct result! I believe there is Coordinate for Google Maps in ArcGIS as "Web Mercator" to do this but I couldn't find it in QGis.
What Coordinate should I use for Getting correct points X and Y on google map?
I also used EPSG:900913 Google Mercator
but when I tried to get X and Y coords through Geometry Tool/ Export add Geometry Columns I am getting numbers like :
Result using EPSG:3857:
qgis google-maps-api
If you're looking for lat/longs, then 4326 is your destination coordinate system.
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:37
Thanks Mintx 4326 looks more like lat and long but what I am getting are wrong coordinates!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:53
Could you give an example of a coordinate before and after converting?
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
Like actual file?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
It looks like some of your source coordinates are swapped. If the area of interest isn't too large and should relatively near Vancouver, all x values should be >1 million. Thus point 1, 9, 13, etc need their values swapped.
– mkennedy
Jan 30 '15 at 21:01
|
show 2 more comments
I have some Points in Shapefile with BC Albers Coordinate Syetem and I need to Project them to Google Maps Lat and Long. I tried to do this by using
WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator EPSG: 3857
and
WGS84 EPSG: 4326
But none of them returning correct result! I believe there is Coordinate for Google Maps in ArcGIS as "Web Mercator" to do this but I couldn't find it in QGis.
What Coordinate should I use for Getting correct points X and Y on google map?
I also used EPSG:900913 Google Mercator
but when I tried to get X and Y coords through Geometry Tool/ Export add Geometry Columns I am getting numbers like :
Result using EPSG:3857:
qgis google-maps-api
I have some Points in Shapefile with BC Albers Coordinate Syetem and I need to Project them to Google Maps Lat and Long. I tried to do this by using
WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator EPSG: 3857
and
WGS84 EPSG: 4326
But none of them returning correct result! I believe there is Coordinate for Google Maps in ArcGIS as "Web Mercator" to do this but I couldn't find it in QGis.
What Coordinate should I use for Getting correct points X and Y on google map?
I also used EPSG:900913 Google Mercator
but when I tried to get X and Y coords through Geometry Tool/ Export add Geometry Columns I am getting numbers like :
Result using EPSG:3857:
qgis google-maps-api
qgis google-maps-api
edited 5 mins ago
PolyGeo♦
53.7k1781244
53.7k1781244
asked Jan 30 '15 at 20:04
BehseiniBehseini
318515
318515
If you're looking for lat/longs, then 4326 is your destination coordinate system.
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:37
Thanks Mintx 4326 looks more like lat and long but what I am getting are wrong coordinates!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:53
Could you give an example of a coordinate before and after converting?
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
Like actual file?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
It looks like some of your source coordinates are swapped. If the area of interest isn't too large and should relatively near Vancouver, all x values should be >1 million. Thus point 1, 9, 13, etc need their values swapped.
– mkennedy
Jan 30 '15 at 21:01
|
show 2 more comments
If you're looking for lat/longs, then 4326 is your destination coordinate system.
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:37
Thanks Mintx 4326 looks more like lat and long but what I am getting are wrong coordinates!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:53
Could you give an example of a coordinate before and after converting?
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
Like actual file?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
It looks like some of your source coordinates are swapped. If the area of interest isn't too large and should relatively near Vancouver, all x values should be >1 million. Thus point 1, 9, 13, etc need their values swapped.
– mkennedy
Jan 30 '15 at 21:01
If you're looking for lat/longs, then 4326 is your destination coordinate system.
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:37
If you're looking for lat/longs, then 4326 is your destination coordinate system.
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:37
Thanks Mintx 4326 looks more like lat and long but what I am getting are wrong coordinates!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:53
Thanks Mintx 4326 looks more like lat and long but what I am getting are wrong coordinates!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:53
Could you give an example of a coordinate before and after converting?
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
Could you give an example of a coordinate before and after converting?
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
Like actual file?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
Like actual file?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
It looks like some of your source coordinates are swapped. If the area of interest isn't too large and should relatively near Vancouver, all x values should be >1 million. Thus point 1, 9, 13, etc need their values swapped.
– mkennedy
Jan 30 '15 at 21:01
It looks like some of your source coordinates are swapped. If the area of interest isn't too large and should relatively near Vancouver, all x values should be >1 million. Thus point 1, 9, 13, etc need their values swapped.
– mkennedy
Jan 30 '15 at 21:01
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
What you need to do is first display your CSV in the proper coordinate system (BC Albers) so QGIS can then re-project it to Google Maps Mercator (3857).
EPSG:3857 -- WGS84 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere) is what you want.
So what you need to do is add your CSV to QGIS using 'Layer > Add Layer > Add Delimited Text Layer'.
Choose the default options in the first window:
The next window will ask you what coordinate system you want to use to display your X and Y values. You know it is in BC Albers, so choose that option in the dialogue box:
Now your points - still in BC Albers - will display in QGIS - but this is tricky because you will have a hard time displaying the various OpenLayers backgrounds with this data.
Here are the points on their own:
The last step is to actually re-project your data to Google Maps projection
Right-click the sample (CSV / delimited) layer in QGIS > Save As
Format: ESRI Shapefile
Save as: give your new SHP a name
CRS: Selected CRS > choose EPSG:3857 WGS84 / Psuedo Mercator**
Click OK to export and re-project your CSV to SHP in 3857
Now create a new map (to reset the coordinate system of the QGIS project)
Add your SHP you saved, and from the Web > OpenLayers menu add one of the basemaps:
That should do it!
Updates:
**The difference between EPSG:3857 and EPSG:3785 in QGIS is confusing, and I'm not exactly sure what the purpose of 3785 is... Most if not all web map systems are published using EPSG:3857 yet in QGIS the description for 3785 is "Popular Visualization CRS / Mercator" and the description for the CORRECT web mercator is "WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator". I will take up this issue somewhere else!
Update #2: I see in this thread that 3785 is the deprecated version of the 'google maps' coordinate system... I hope QGIS can make note of this soon...
Thanks MapBaker but I am not getting Correct value for X and Y at EPSG:3857!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:26
I uploaded an image showing the result of X and Y at EPSG:3857, can you please take a look at that?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:30
@Behseini updated my answer with the correct CRS/EPSG value and the steps to get your data working correctly...
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 21:44
@Behseini you are welcome!!! good luck!
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 22:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132510%2fusing-google-maps-coordinate-system-in-qgis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What you need to do is first display your CSV in the proper coordinate system (BC Albers) so QGIS can then re-project it to Google Maps Mercator (3857).
EPSG:3857 -- WGS84 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere) is what you want.
So what you need to do is add your CSV to QGIS using 'Layer > Add Layer > Add Delimited Text Layer'.
Choose the default options in the first window:
The next window will ask you what coordinate system you want to use to display your X and Y values. You know it is in BC Albers, so choose that option in the dialogue box:
Now your points - still in BC Albers - will display in QGIS - but this is tricky because you will have a hard time displaying the various OpenLayers backgrounds with this data.
Here are the points on their own:
The last step is to actually re-project your data to Google Maps projection
Right-click the sample (CSV / delimited) layer in QGIS > Save As
Format: ESRI Shapefile
Save as: give your new SHP a name
CRS: Selected CRS > choose EPSG:3857 WGS84 / Psuedo Mercator**
Click OK to export and re-project your CSV to SHP in 3857
Now create a new map (to reset the coordinate system of the QGIS project)
Add your SHP you saved, and from the Web > OpenLayers menu add one of the basemaps:
That should do it!
Updates:
**The difference between EPSG:3857 and EPSG:3785 in QGIS is confusing, and I'm not exactly sure what the purpose of 3785 is... Most if not all web map systems are published using EPSG:3857 yet in QGIS the description for 3785 is "Popular Visualization CRS / Mercator" and the description for the CORRECT web mercator is "WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator". I will take up this issue somewhere else!
Update #2: I see in this thread that 3785 is the deprecated version of the 'google maps' coordinate system... I hope QGIS can make note of this soon...
Thanks MapBaker but I am not getting Correct value for X and Y at EPSG:3857!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:26
I uploaded an image showing the result of X and Y at EPSG:3857, can you please take a look at that?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:30
@Behseini updated my answer with the correct CRS/EPSG value and the steps to get your data working correctly...
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 21:44
@Behseini you are welcome!!! good luck!
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 22:38
add a comment |
What you need to do is first display your CSV in the proper coordinate system (BC Albers) so QGIS can then re-project it to Google Maps Mercator (3857).
EPSG:3857 -- WGS84 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere) is what you want.
So what you need to do is add your CSV to QGIS using 'Layer > Add Layer > Add Delimited Text Layer'.
Choose the default options in the first window:
The next window will ask you what coordinate system you want to use to display your X and Y values. You know it is in BC Albers, so choose that option in the dialogue box:
Now your points - still in BC Albers - will display in QGIS - but this is tricky because you will have a hard time displaying the various OpenLayers backgrounds with this data.
Here are the points on their own:
The last step is to actually re-project your data to Google Maps projection
Right-click the sample (CSV / delimited) layer in QGIS > Save As
Format: ESRI Shapefile
Save as: give your new SHP a name
CRS: Selected CRS > choose EPSG:3857 WGS84 / Psuedo Mercator**
Click OK to export and re-project your CSV to SHP in 3857
Now create a new map (to reset the coordinate system of the QGIS project)
Add your SHP you saved, and from the Web > OpenLayers menu add one of the basemaps:
That should do it!
Updates:
**The difference between EPSG:3857 and EPSG:3785 in QGIS is confusing, and I'm not exactly sure what the purpose of 3785 is... Most if not all web map systems are published using EPSG:3857 yet in QGIS the description for 3785 is "Popular Visualization CRS / Mercator" and the description for the CORRECT web mercator is "WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator". I will take up this issue somewhere else!
Update #2: I see in this thread that 3785 is the deprecated version of the 'google maps' coordinate system... I hope QGIS can make note of this soon...
Thanks MapBaker but I am not getting Correct value for X and Y at EPSG:3857!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:26
I uploaded an image showing the result of X and Y at EPSG:3857, can you please take a look at that?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:30
@Behseini updated my answer with the correct CRS/EPSG value and the steps to get your data working correctly...
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 21:44
@Behseini you are welcome!!! good luck!
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 22:38
add a comment |
What you need to do is first display your CSV in the proper coordinate system (BC Albers) so QGIS can then re-project it to Google Maps Mercator (3857).
EPSG:3857 -- WGS84 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere) is what you want.
So what you need to do is add your CSV to QGIS using 'Layer > Add Layer > Add Delimited Text Layer'.
Choose the default options in the first window:
The next window will ask you what coordinate system you want to use to display your X and Y values. You know it is in BC Albers, so choose that option in the dialogue box:
Now your points - still in BC Albers - will display in QGIS - but this is tricky because you will have a hard time displaying the various OpenLayers backgrounds with this data.
Here are the points on their own:
The last step is to actually re-project your data to Google Maps projection
Right-click the sample (CSV / delimited) layer in QGIS > Save As
Format: ESRI Shapefile
Save as: give your new SHP a name
CRS: Selected CRS > choose EPSG:3857 WGS84 / Psuedo Mercator**
Click OK to export and re-project your CSV to SHP in 3857
Now create a new map (to reset the coordinate system of the QGIS project)
Add your SHP you saved, and from the Web > OpenLayers menu add one of the basemaps:
That should do it!
Updates:
**The difference between EPSG:3857 and EPSG:3785 in QGIS is confusing, and I'm not exactly sure what the purpose of 3785 is... Most if not all web map systems are published using EPSG:3857 yet in QGIS the description for 3785 is "Popular Visualization CRS / Mercator" and the description for the CORRECT web mercator is "WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator". I will take up this issue somewhere else!
Update #2: I see in this thread that 3785 is the deprecated version of the 'google maps' coordinate system... I hope QGIS can make note of this soon...
What you need to do is first display your CSV in the proper coordinate system (BC Albers) so QGIS can then re-project it to Google Maps Mercator (3857).
EPSG:3857 -- WGS84 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere) is what you want.
So what you need to do is add your CSV to QGIS using 'Layer > Add Layer > Add Delimited Text Layer'.
Choose the default options in the first window:
The next window will ask you what coordinate system you want to use to display your X and Y values. You know it is in BC Albers, so choose that option in the dialogue box:
Now your points - still in BC Albers - will display in QGIS - but this is tricky because you will have a hard time displaying the various OpenLayers backgrounds with this data.
Here are the points on their own:
The last step is to actually re-project your data to Google Maps projection
Right-click the sample (CSV / delimited) layer in QGIS > Save As
Format: ESRI Shapefile
Save as: give your new SHP a name
CRS: Selected CRS > choose EPSG:3857 WGS84 / Psuedo Mercator**
Click OK to export and re-project your CSV to SHP in 3857
Now create a new map (to reset the coordinate system of the QGIS project)
Add your SHP you saved, and from the Web > OpenLayers menu add one of the basemaps:
That should do it!
Updates:
**The difference between EPSG:3857 and EPSG:3785 in QGIS is confusing, and I'm not exactly sure what the purpose of 3785 is... Most if not all web map systems are published using EPSG:3857 yet in QGIS the description for 3785 is "Popular Visualization CRS / Mercator" and the description for the CORRECT web mercator is "WGS 84 / Pseudo Mercator". I will take up this issue somewhere else!
Update #2: I see in this thread that 3785 is the deprecated version of the 'google maps' coordinate system... I hope QGIS can make note of this soon...
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:33
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 30 '15 at 20:23
DPSSpatialDPSSpatial
12k14281
12k14281
Thanks MapBaker but I am not getting Correct value for X and Y at EPSG:3857!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:26
I uploaded an image showing the result of X and Y at EPSG:3857, can you please take a look at that?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:30
@Behseini updated my answer with the correct CRS/EPSG value and the steps to get your data working correctly...
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 21:44
@Behseini you are welcome!!! good luck!
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 22:38
add a comment |
Thanks MapBaker but I am not getting Correct value for X and Y at EPSG:3857!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:26
I uploaded an image showing the result of X and Y at EPSG:3857, can you please take a look at that?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:30
@Behseini updated my answer with the correct CRS/EPSG value and the steps to get your data working correctly...
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 21:44
@Behseini you are welcome!!! good luck!
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 22:38
Thanks MapBaker but I am not getting Correct value for X and Y at EPSG:3857!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:26
Thanks MapBaker but I am not getting Correct value for X and Y at EPSG:3857!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:26
I uploaded an image showing the result of X and Y at EPSG:3857, can you please take a look at that?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:30
I uploaded an image showing the result of X and Y at EPSG:3857, can you please take a look at that?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:30
@Behseini updated my answer with the correct CRS/EPSG value and the steps to get your data working correctly...
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 21:44
@Behseini updated my answer with the correct CRS/EPSG value and the steps to get your data working correctly...
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 21:44
@Behseini you are welcome!!! good luck!
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 22:38
@Behseini you are welcome!!! good luck!
– DPSSpatial
Jan 30 '15 at 22:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132510%2fusing-google-maps-coordinate-system-in-qgis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If you're looking for lat/longs, then 4326 is your destination coordinate system.
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:37
Thanks Mintx 4326 looks more like lat and long but what I am getting are wrong coordinates!
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:53
Could you give an example of a coordinate before and after converting?
– Mintx
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
Like actual file?
– Behseini
Jan 30 '15 at 20:55
It looks like some of your source coordinates are swapped. If the area of interest isn't too large and should relatively near Vancouver, all x values should be >1 million. Thus point 1, 9, 13, etc need their values swapped.
– mkennedy
Jan 30 '15 at 21:01