PostGIS: Change raster values depending on values from other raster Planned maintenance...

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

Examples of mediopassive verb constructions

"Seemed to had" is it correct?

Does accepting a pardon have any bearing on trying that person for the same crime in a sovereign jurisdiction?

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?

How can players work together to take actions that are otherwise impossible?

Right-skewed distribution with mean equals to mode?

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Why does Python start at index 1 when iterating an array backwards?

Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics

What is the longest distance a 13th-level monk can jump while attacking on the same turn?

How do I determine if the rules for a long jump or high jump are applicable for Monks?

How to draw this diagram using TikZ package?

Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?

How to motivate offshore teams and trust them to deliver?

Can Pao de Queijo, and similar foods, be kosher for Passover?

Java 8 stream max() function argument type Comparator vs Comparable

Does surprise arrest existing movement?

When is phishing education going too far?

How do I mention the quality of my school without bragging

List *all* the tuples!

Gastric acid as a weapon



PostGIS: Change raster values depending on values from other raster



Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Reclassifying a raster based on values in another rasterHow to compare two rasters and reclass the greater value(python script)?In R, set NA cells in one raster where another raster has valuesHow do I replace cell values of a raster using values of another raster with differing extent?Assigning score to raster based on cell overlap with other raster and field valueGeospatially match cells of different rasters - possible?How does `ST_Union` treat NULL values in a raster?Change detection between binary rasters in QGisPostGIS raster MapAlgebra callback optimizationReading value of point (x, y) in raster and changing its value to another raster using PyQGIS?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















I have two rasters and I want to change all the values from "raster1" to 4, where they are larger than the values from "raster2" and to 0, where they are smaller.



So raster2 has only one value, which is 1.



raster1 has two values: 0,5 and 2



0,5 should change to 0 and 2 should change to 4



I tried with st_reclass and a case/when/else-argument, but then it changed ALL values to 0 or 4... Here's my code:



DROP TABLE IF EXISTS result_table;
CREATE TABLE result_table AS

SELECT
p.id,
case
WHEN (pvc).value > (cvc).value
THEN st_reclass(p.rast,1, '-999-999:4', '8BUI', NULL)
ELSE st_reclass(p.rast,1, '-999-999:0', '8BUI', NULL)
END AS rast
FROM
raster1 as p,
raster2 as c,
(select st_valuecount(dcp.rast) as pvc from raster1 as dcp) as pp,
(Select st_valuecount(dcubc.rast) as cvc from raster2 as dcubc) as cc;


Ok, I could just reclass the values without looking up the other raster, but I want to do this multiple times with different rasters and values.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • You did not say what must happen when values are equal...

    – Pierre Racine
    Sep 5 '18 at 17:34











  • Thanks, I forgot: all values lower or equal to those from raster 2 should change to 0.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:18


















0















I have two rasters and I want to change all the values from "raster1" to 4, where they are larger than the values from "raster2" and to 0, where they are smaller.



So raster2 has only one value, which is 1.



raster1 has two values: 0,5 and 2



0,5 should change to 0 and 2 should change to 4



I tried with st_reclass and a case/when/else-argument, but then it changed ALL values to 0 or 4... Here's my code:



DROP TABLE IF EXISTS result_table;
CREATE TABLE result_table AS

SELECT
p.id,
case
WHEN (pvc).value > (cvc).value
THEN st_reclass(p.rast,1, '-999-999:4', '8BUI', NULL)
ELSE st_reclass(p.rast,1, '-999-999:0', '8BUI', NULL)
END AS rast
FROM
raster1 as p,
raster2 as c,
(select st_valuecount(dcp.rast) as pvc from raster1 as dcp) as pp,
(Select st_valuecount(dcubc.rast) as cvc from raster2 as dcubc) as cc;


Ok, I could just reclass the values without looking up the other raster, but I want to do this multiple times with different rasters and values.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • You did not say what must happen when values are equal...

    – Pierre Racine
    Sep 5 '18 at 17:34











  • Thanks, I forgot: all values lower or equal to those from raster 2 should change to 0.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:18














0












0








0








I have two rasters and I want to change all the values from "raster1" to 4, where they are larger than the values from "raster2" and to 0, where they are smaller.



So raster2 has only one value, which is 1.



raster1 has two values: 0,5 and 2



0,5 should change to 0 and 2 should change to 4



I tried with st_reclass and a case/when/else-argument, but then it changed ALL values to 0 or 4... Here's my code:



DROP TABLE IF EXISTS result_table;
CREATE TABLE result_table AS

SELECT
p.id,
case
WHEN (pvc).value > (cvc).value
THEN st_reclass(p.rast,1, '-999-999:4', '8BUI', NULL)
ELSE st_reclass(p.rast,1, '-999-999:0', '8BUI', NULL)
END AS rast
FROM
raster1 as p,
raster2 as c,
(select st_valuecount(dcp.rast) as pvc from raster1 as dcp) as pp,
(Select st_valuecount(dcubc.rast) as cvc from raster2 as dcubc) as cc;


Ok, I could just reclass the values without looking up the other raster, but I want to do this multiple times with different rasters and values.










share|improve this question
















I have two rasters and I want to change all the values from "raster1" to 4, where they are larger than the values from "raster2" and to 0, where they are smaller.



So raster2 has only one value, which is 1.



raster1 has two values: 0,5 and 2



0,5 should change to 0 and 2 should change to 4



I tried with st_reclass and a case/when/else-argument, but then it changed ALL values to 0 or 4... Here's my code:



DROP TABLE IF EXISTS result_table;
CREATE TABLE result_table AS

SELECT
p.id,
case
WHEN (pvc).value > (cvc).value
THEN st_reclass(p.rast,1, '-999-999:4', '8BUI', NULL)
ELSE st_reclass(p.rast,1, '-999-999:0', '8BUI', NULL)
END AS rast
FROM
raster1 as p,
raster2 as c,
(select st_valuecount(dcp.rast) as pvc from raster1 as dcp) as pp,
(Select st_valuecount(dcubc.rast) as cvc from raster2 as dcubc) as cc;


Ok, I could just reclass the values without looking up the other raster, but I want to do this multiple times with different rasters and values.







postgis raster postgresql values






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 5 '18 at 22:41









Damini Jain

1,560217




1,560217










asked Sep 4 '18 at 9:34









blueJayblueJay

1




1





bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • You did not say what must happen when values are equal...

    – Pierre Racine
    Sep 5 '18 at 17:34











  • Thanks, I forgot: all values lower or equal to those from raster 2 should change to 0.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:18



















  • You did not say what must happen when values are equal...

    – Pierre Racine
    Sep 5 '18 at 17:34











  • Thanks, I forgot: all values lower or equal to those from raster 2 should change to 0.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:18

















You did not say what must happen when values are equal...

– Pierre Racine
Sep 5 '18 at 17:34





You did not say what must happen when values are equal...

– Pierre Racine
Sep 5 '18 at 17:34













Thanks, I forgot: all values lower or equal to those from raster 2 should change to 0.

– blueJay
Sep 7 '18 at 9:18





Thanks, I forgot: all values lower or equal to those from raster 2 should change to 0.

– blueJay
Sep 7 '18 at 9:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














You have to use the two raster version of ST_MapAlgebra(). Something like:



SELECT ST_MapAlgebra(p.rast, 1, 
c.rast, 1,
'CASE WHEN [rast1] > [rast2] THEN 4 ELSE 0 END') rast
FROM raster1 as p, raster2 as c





share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks for the answer, but this doesn't work the way I want, because it changes ALL values from raster1 to '4', not only those greater than 1.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:17











  • I found out a different solution though, which seems to work for me: I changed the reclass-expression to: '-999-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| ']:0, ('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| '-100]:2'

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:20





















0














As commented in the answer above I found a solution to the problem:



    Update raster1 
Set rast = ST_Reclass
(rast, 1, '[-100-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||']:0,
('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||'-100]:4', '8BUI', NULL);





share|improve this answer
























  • I don't understand how this works, when ST_ValueCount is an aggregate function. MapAlgebra is the only way you can do a pixel by pixel comparison.

    – John Powell
    Sep 10 '18 at 15:19











  • I don't really understand it either.. But when I try this with MapAlgebra (Pierre Racine's answer) and then check the result, the raster has only one value (4) where it should have two values (0 and 4). In my solution, I could just replace the whole subselection with 0.5, as raster2 has only this one value and I am already thinking about doing just that. Would make it a lot easier

    – blueJay
    Sep 12 '18 at 13:18











  • Pierre Racine is the guy who created Postgis raster, so I tend to pay attention to what he says :-). I would suggest fiddling with his answer, because ST_ValueCount is an aggregate, and not pixel by pixel, so you may have got it right by chance.

    – John Powell
    Sep 12 '18 at 15:34












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f294865%2fpostgis-change-raster-values-depending-on-values-from-other-raster%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














You have to use the two raster version of ST_MapAlgebra(). Something like:



SELECT ST_MapAlgebra(p.rast, 1, 
c.rast, 1,
'CASE WHEN [rast1] > [rast2] THEN 4 ELSE 0 END') rast
FROM raster1 as p, raster2 as c





share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks for the answer, but this doesn't work the way I want, because it changes ALL values from raster1 to '4', not only those greater than 1.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:17











  • I found out a different solution though, which seems to work for me: I changed the reclass-expression to: '-999-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| ']:0, ('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| '-100]:2'

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:20


















0














You have to use the two raster version of ST_MapAlgebra(). Something like:



SELECT ST_MapAlgebra(p.rast, 1, 
c.rast, 1,
'CASE WHEN [rast1] > [rast2] THEN 4 ELSE 0 END') rast
FROM raster1 as p, raster2 as c





share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks for the answer, but this doesn't work the way I want, because it changes ALL values from raster1 to '4', not only those greater than 1.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:17











  • I found out a different solution though, which seems to work for me: I changed the reclass-expression to: '-999-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| ']:0, ('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| '-100]:2'

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:20
















0












0








0







You have to use the two raster version of ST_MapAlgebra(). Something like:



SELECT ST_MapAlgebra(p.rast, 1, 
c.rast, 1,
'CASE WHEN [rast1] > [rast2] THEN 4 ELSE 0 END') rast
FROM raster1 as p, raster2 as c





share|improve this answer













You have to use the two raster version of ST_MapAlgebra(). Something like:



SELECT ST_MapAlgebra(p.rast, 1, 
c.rast, 1,
'CASE WHEN [rast1] > [rast2] THEN 4 ELSE 0 END') rast
FROM raster1 as p, raster2 as c






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Sep 5 '18 at 17:34









Pierre RacinePierre Racine

1,51698




1,51698













  • Thanks for the answer, but this doesn't work the way I want, because it changes ALL values from raster1 to '4', not only those greater than 1.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:17











  • I found out a different solution though, which seems to work for me: I changed the reclass-expression to: '-999-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| ']:0, ('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| '-100]:2'

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:20





















  • Thanks for the answer, but this doesn't work the way I want, because it changes ALL values from raster1 to '4', not only those greater than 1.

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:17











  • I found out a different solution though, which seems to work for me: I changed the reclass-expression to: '-999-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| ']:0, ('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| '-100]:2'

    – blueJay
    Sep 7 '18 at 9:20



















Thanks for the answer, but this doesn't work the way I want, because it changes ALL values from raster1 to '4', not only those greater than 1.

– blueJay
Sep 7 '18 at 9:17





Thanks for the answer, but this doesn't work the way I want, because it changes ALL values from raster1 to '4', not only those greater than 1.

– blueJay
Sep 7 '18 at 9:17













I found out a different solution though, which seems to work for me: I changed the reclass-expression to: '-999-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| ']:0, ('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| '-100]:2'

– blueJay
Sep 7 '18 at 9:20







I found out a different solution though, which seems to work for me: I changed the reclass-expression to: '-999-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| ']:0, ('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a from raster2 as aaa) as aa)|| '-100]:2'

– blueJay
Sep 7 '18 at 9:20















0














As commented in the answer above I found a solution to the problem:



    Update raster1 
Set rast = ST_Reclass
(rast, 1, '[-100-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||']:0,
('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||'-100]:4', '8BUI', NULL);





share|improve this answer
























  • I don't understand how this works, when ST_ValueCount is an aggregate function. MapAlgebra is the only way you can do a pixel by pixel comparison.

    – John Powell
    Sep 10 '18 at 15:19











  • I don't really understand it either.. But when I try this with MapAlgebra (Pierre Racine's answer) and then check the result, the raster has only one value (4) where it should have two values (0 and 4). In my solution, I could just replace the whole subselection with 0.5, as raster2 has only this one value and I am already thinking about doing just that. Would make it a lot easier

    – blueJay
    Sep 12 '18 at 13:18











  • Pierre Racine is the guy who created Postgis raster, so I tend to pay attention to what he says :-). I would suggest fiddling with his answer, because ST_ValueCount is an aggregate, and not pixel by pixel, so you may have got it right by chance.

    – John Powell
    Sep 12 '18 at 15:34
















0














As commented in the answer above I found a solution to the problem:



    Update raster1 
Set rast = ST_Reclass
(rast, 1, '[-100-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||']:0,
('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||'-100]:4', '8BUI', NULL);





share|improve this answer
























  • I don't understand how this works, when ST_ValueCount is an aggregate function. MapAlgebra is the only way you can do a pixel by pixel comparison.

    – John Powell
    Sep 10 '18 at 15:19











  • I don't really understand it either.. But when I try this with MapAlgebra (Pierre Racine's answer) and then check the result, the raster has only one value (4) where it should have two values (0 and 4). In my solution, I could just replace the whole subselection with 0.5, as raster2 has only this one value and I am already thinking about doing just that. Would make it a lot easier

    – blueJay
    Sep 12 '18 at 13:18











  • Pierre Racine is the guy who created Postgis raster, so I tend to pay attention to what he says :-). I would suggest fiddling with his answer, because ST_ValueCount is an aggregate, and not pixel by pixel, so you may have got it right by chance.

    – John Powell
    Sep 12 '18 at 15:34














0












0








0







As commented in the answer above I found a solution to the problem:



    Update raster1 
Set rast = ST_Reclass
(rast, 1, '[-100-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||']:0,
('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||'-100]:4', '8BUI', NULL);





share|improve this answer













As commented in the answer above I found a solution to the problem:



    Update raster1 
Set rast = ST_Reclass
(rast, 1, '[-100-'||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||']:0,
('||(Select distinct (a).value from (select st_valuecount(aaa.rast) as a raster2 as aaa) as aa) ||'-100]:4', '8BUI', NULL);






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Sep 7 '18 at 10:07









blueJayblueJay

1




1













  • I don't understand how this works, when ST_ValueCount is an aggregate function. MapAlgebra is the only way you can do a pixel by pixel comparison.

    – John Powell
    Sep 10 '18 at 15:19











  • I don't really understand it either.. But when I try this with MapAlgebra (Pierre Racine's answer) and then check the result, the raster has only one value (4) where it should have two values (0 and 4). In my solution, I could just replace the whole subselection with 0.5, as raster2 has only this one value and I am already thinking about doing just that. Would make it a lot easier

    – blueJay
    Sep 12 '18 at 13:18











  • Pierre Racine is the guy who created Postgis raster, so I tend to pay attention to what he says :-). I would suggest fiddling with his answer, because ST_ValueCount is an aggregate, and not pixel by pixel, so you may have got it right by chance.

    – John Powell
    Sep 12 '18 at 15:34



















  • I don't understand how this works, when ST_ValueCount is an aggregate function. MapAlgebra is the only way you can do a pixel by pixel comparison.

    – John Powell
    Sep 10 '18 at 15:19











  • I don't really understand it either.. But when I try this with MapAlgebra (Pierre Racine's answer) and then check the result, the raster has only one value (4) where it should have two values (0 and 4). In my solution, I could just replace the whole subselection with 0.5, as raster2 has only this one value and I am already thinking about doing just that. Would make it a lot easier

    – blueJay
    Sep 12 '18 at 13:18











  • Pierre Racine is the guy who created Postgis raster, so I tend to pay attention to what he says :-). I would suggest fiddling with his answer, because ST_ValueCount is an aggregate, and not pixel by pixel, so you may have got it right by chance.

    – John Powell
    Sep 12 '18 at 15:34

















I don't understand how this works, when ST_ValueCount is an aggregate function. MapAlgebra is the only way you can do a pixel by pixel comparison.

– John Powell
Sep 10 '18 at 15:19





I don't understand how this works, when ST_ValueCount is an aggregate function. MapAlgebra is the only way you can do a pixel by pixel comparison.

– John Powell
Sep 10 '18 at 15:19













I don't really understand it either.. But when I try this with MapAlgebra (Pierre Racine's answer) and then check the result, the raster has only one value (4) where it should have two values (0 and 4). In my solution, I could just replace the whole subselection with 0.5, as raster2 has only this one value and I am already thinking about doing just that. Would make it a lot easier

– blueJay
Sep 12 '18 at 13:18





I don't really understand it either.. But when I try this with MapAlgebra (Pierre Racine's answer) and then check the result, the raster has only one value (4) where it should have two values (0 and 4). In my solution, I could just replace the whole subselection with 0.5, as raster2 has only this one value and I am already thinking about doing just that. Would make it a lot easier

– blueJay
Sep 12 '18 at 13:18













Pierre Racine is the guy who created Postgis raster, so I tend to pay attention to what he says :-). I would suggest fiddling with his answer, because ST_ValueCount is an aggregate, and not pixel by pixel, so you may have got it right by chance.

– John Powell
Sep 12 '18 at 15:34





Pierre Racine is the guy who created Postgis raster, so I tend to pay attention to what he says :-). I would suggest fiddling with his answer, because ST_ValueCount is an aggregate, and not pixel by pixel, so you may have got it right by chance.

– John Powell
Sep 12 '18 at 15:34


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f294865%2fpostgis-change-raster-values-depending-on-values-from-other-raster%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Щит и меч (фильм) Содержание Названия серий | Сюжет |...

Венесуэла на летних Олимпийских играх 2000 Содержание Состав...

Meter-Bus Содержание Параметры шины | Стандартизация |...