Symbolic Multivariate DistributionPrevent Part[] from trying to extract parts of symbolic expressionsHow do...
Pre-plastic human skin alternative
Does Gita support doctrine of eternal cycle of birth and death for evil people?
Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?
How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?
Multiple options vs single option UI
How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
What does ゆーか mean?
Can we say “you can pay when the order gets ready”?
Was Dennis Ritchie being too modest in this quote about C and Pascal?
"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
Checks user level and limit the data before saving it to mongoDB
The Defining Moment
Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?
Get consecutive integer number ranges from list of int
Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?
Extension of 2-adic valuation to the real numbers
What happened to Captain America in Endgame?
A strange hotel
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
Is it idiomatic to construct against `this`?
Mjolnir's timeline from Thor's perspective
Symbolic Multivariate Distribution
Prevent Part[] from trying to extract parts of symbolic expressionsHow do you pattern match a DataDistributionIs it possible to create a compiled function with some symbolic arguments?Reverse engineer a sample value from a CDFInconsistent DistributionFitTest results?Pattern matching with PDF, Distributed and multivariate distributionsGiven an exact formula, how can Mathematica find a probability distribution whose PDF matches it?TransformedDistribution using integration with parameter doesn't workPDF of sum of squared UniformDistribution (TransformedDistribution)How do I check and justifiy a symbolic result returned by Mathematica?
$begingroup$
If I try to input a symbolic multivariate distribution, I do not get a useful result.
PDF[MultinormalDistribution[m, S], x]
(* During evaluation of MultinormalDistribution::vrprm: The value m at position 1 in MultinormalDistribution[m,S] is expected to be a list of real numbers. *)
(* During evaluation of MultinormalDistribution::vrprm: The value m at position 1 in MultinormalDistribution[m,S] is expected to be a list of real numbers.*)
(* PDF[MultinormalDistribution[m, S], x] *)
Clearly, Mathematica could return an appropriate symbolic expression. Is there any way of making it do so?
probability-or-statistics symbolic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I try to input a symbolic multivariate distribution, I do not get a useful result.
PDF[MultinormalDistribution[m, S], x]
(* During evaluation of MultinormalDistribution::vrprm: The value m at position 1 in MultinormalDistribution[m,S] is expected to be a list of real numbers. *)
(* During evaluation of MultinormalDistribution::vrprm: The value m at position 1 in MultinormalDistribution[m,S] is expected to be a list of real numbers.*)
(* PDF[MultinormalDistribution[m, S], x] *)
Clearly, Mathematica could return an appropriate symbolic expression. Is there any way of making it do so?
probability-or-statistics symbolic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I try to input a symbolic multivariate distribution, I do not get a useful result.
PDF[MultinormalDistribution[m, S], x]
(* During evaluation of MultinormalDistribution::vrprm: The value m at position 1 in MultinormalDistribution[m,S] is expected to be a list of real numbers. *)
(* During evaluation of MultinormalDistribution::vrprm: The value m at position 1 in MultinormalDistribution[m,S] is expected to be a list of real numbers.*)
(* PDF[MultinormalDistribution[m, S], x] *)
Clearly, Mathematica could return an appropriate symbolic expression. Is there any way of making it do so?
probability-or-statistics symbolic
$endgroup$
If I try to input a symbolic multivariate distribution, I do not get a useful result.
PDF[MultinormalDistribution[m, S], x]
(* During evaluation of MultinormalDistribution::vrprm: The value m at position 1 in MultinormalDistribution[m,S] is expected to be a list of real numbers. *)
(* During evaluation of MultinormalDistribution::vrprm: The value m at position 1 in MultinormalDistribution[m,S] is expected to be a list of real numbers.*)
(* PDF[MultinormalDistribution[m, S], x] *)
Clearly, Mathematica could return an appropriate symbolic expression. Is there any way of making it do so?
probability-or-statistics symbolic
probability-or-statistics symbolic
asked 2 hours ago
mikadomikado
6,9371929
6,9371929
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You need to supply Mathematica with the structure of your variables:
(* dimension of distribution *)
n = 2;
PDF[
MultinormalDistribution[
Array[Subscript[m, ##] &, n],
Array[Subscript[S, Sequence @@ Sort@{##}] &, {n, n}]
],
Array[Subscript[x, ##] &, n]
]
We use Array
to construct variables of the form Subscript[var,i,j,…]
(you can of course use any other form that is more convenient). Note that S
is explicitly made symmetric by sorting the indices. The code works without this, but this way there are no "fake" parameters.
Note: As pointed out by @BobHanlon in the comments, Subscript
can often cause issues if used blindly. For actual use, it is much safer to simply use indexed variables such as Array[x, n]
.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Rather than using subscripted variables, I recommend using indexed variables and then usingFormat
to display the indexed variables as subscripted variables. Subscripted variables tend to cause problems in solvers.
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
I am aware of that - I just thought that for a quick demonstration, it would be good enough and it's easy to read. But I will add a comment to the answer to point out potential issues.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Lang
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197180%2fsymbolic-multivariate-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You need to supply Mathematica with the structure of your variables:
(* dimension of distribution *)
n = 2;
PDF[
MultinormalDistribution[
Array[Subscript[m, ##] &, n],
Array[Subscript[S, Sequence @@ Sort@{##}] &, {n, n}]
],
Array[Subscript[x, ##] &, n]
]
We use Array
to construct variables of the form Subscript[var,i,j,…]
(you can of course use any other form that is more convenient). Note that S
is explicitly made symmetric by sorting the indices. The code works without this, but this way there are no "fake" parameters.
Note: As pointed out by @BobHanlon in the comments, Subscript
can often cause issues if used blindly. For actual use, it is much safer to simply use indexed variables such as Array[x, n]
.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Rather than using subscripted variables, I recommend using indexed variables and then usingFormat
to display the indexed variables as subscripted variables. Subscripted variables tend to cause problems in solvers.
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
I am aware of that - I just thought that for a quick demonstration, it would be good enough and it's easy to read. But I will add a comment to the answer to point out potential issues.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Lang
25 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to supply Mathematica with the structure of your variables:
(* dimension of distribution *)
n = 2;
PDF[
MultinormalDistribution[
Array[Subscript[m, ##] &, n],
Array[Subscript[S, Sequence @@ Sort@{##}] &, {n, n}]
],
Array[Subscript[x, ##] &, n]
]
We use Array
to construct variables of the form Subscript[var,i,j,…]
(you can of course use any other form that is more convenient). Note that S
is explicitly made symmetric by sorting the indices. The code works without this, but this way there are no "fake" parameters.
Note: As pointed out by @BobHanlon in the comments, Subscript
can often cause issues if used blindly. For actual use, it is much safer to simply use indexed variables such as Array[x, n]
.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Rather than using subscripted variables, I recommend using indexed variables and then usingFormat
to display the indexed variables as subscripted variables. Subscripted variables tend to cause problems in solvers.
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
I am aware of that - I just thought that for a quick demonstration, it would be good enough and it's easy to read. But I will add a comment to the answer to point out potential issues.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Lang
25 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to supply Mathematica with the structure of your variables:
(* dimension of distribution *)
n = 2;
PDF[
MultinormalDistribution[
Array[Subscript[m, ##] &, n],
Array[Subscript[S, Sequence @@ Sort@{##}] &, {n, n}]
],
Array[Subscript[x, ##] &, n]
]
We use Array
to construct variables of the form Subscript[var,i,j,…]
(you can of course use any other form that is more convenient). Note that S
is explicitly made symmetric by sorting the indices. The code works without this, but this way there are no "fake" parameters.
Note: As pointed out by @BobHanlon in the comments, Subscript
can often cause issues if used blindly. For actual use, it is much safer to simply use indexed variables such as Array[x, n]
.
$endgroup$
You need to supply Mathematica with the structure of your variables:
(* dimension of distribution *)
n = 2;
PDF[
MultinormalDistribution[
Array[Subscript[m, ##] &, n],
Array[Subscript[S, Sequence @@ Sort@{##}] &, {n, n}]
],
Array[Subscript[x, ##] &, n]
]
We use Array
to construct variables of the form Subscript[var,i,j,…]
(you can of course use any other form that is more convenient). Note that S
is explicitly made symmetric by sorting the indices. The code works without this, but this way there are no "fake" parameters.
Note: As pointed out by @BobHanlon in the comments, Subscript
can often cause issues if used blindly. For actual use, it is much safer to simply use indexed variables such as Array[x, n]
.
edited 20 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
Lukas LangLukas Lang
7,44011032
7,44011032
$begingroup$
Rather than using subscripted variables, I recommend using indexed variables and then usingFormat
to display the indexed variables as subscripted variables. Subscripted variables tend to cause problems in solvers.
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
I am aware of that - I just thought that for a quick demonstration, it would be good enough and it's easy to read. But I will add a comment to the answer to point out potential issues.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Lang
25 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rather than using subscripted variables, I recommend using indexed variables and then usingFormat
to display the indexed variables as subscripted variables. Subscripted variables tend to cause problems in solvers.
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
I am aware of that - I just thought that for a quick demonstration, it would be good enough and it's easy to read. But I will add a comment to the answer to point out potential issues.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Lang
25 mins ago
$begingroup$
Rather than using subscripted variables, I recommend using indexed variables and then using
Format
to display the indexed variables as subscripted variables. Subscripted variables tend to cause problems in solvers.$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
Rather than using subscripted variables, I recommend using indexed variables and then using
Format
to display the indexed variables as subscripted variables. Subscripted variables tend to cause problems in solvers.$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
I am aware of that - I just thought that for a quick demonstration, it would be good enough and it's easy to read. But I will add a comment to the answer to point out potential issues.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Lang
25 mins ago
$begingroup$
I am aware of that - I just thought that for a quick demonstration, it would be good enough and it's easy to read. But I will add a comment to the answer to point out potential issues.
$endgroup$
– Lukas Lang
25 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f197180%2fsymbolic-multivariate-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown