Why does the integral domain “being trapped between a finite field extension” implies that it is a...
Will adding a BY-SA image to a blog post make the entire post BY-SA?
Why does the integral domain "being trapped between a finite field extension" implies that it is a field?
Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?
Is a model fitted to data or is data fitted to a model?
Query about absorption line spectra
If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?
Greco-Roman egalitarianism
Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?
We have a love-hate relationship
Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?
My friend sent me a screenshot of a transaction hash, but when I search for it I find divergent data. What happened?
MAXDOP Settings for SQL Server 2014
Can someone explain how this makes sense electrically?
Proof of Lemma: Every nonzero integer can be written as a product of primes
Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.
How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character
Visiting the UK as unmarried couple
What is this type of notehead called?
Does having a TSA Pre-Check member in your flight reservation increase the chances that everyone gets Pre-Check?
Why has "pence" been used in this sentence, not "pences"?
How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?
Are all species of CANNA edible?
What does this horizontal bar at the first measure mean?
Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?
Why does the integral domain “being trapped between a finite field extension” implies that it is a field?
Linear map $f:Vrightarrow V$ injective $Longleftrightarrow$ surjectiveDoes this morphism necessarily give rise to a finite extension of residue fields?Points lying over a closed point in a separable extension of the base field are rationnalWhat kind of points are there in a finite type $k$-scheme?Quotient of ring is flat gives an identity of idealsWhen is the tensor product of a separable field extension with itself a domain?Why is the residue field of a $k$-scheme an extension of $k$?An example of normalization of schemeFinite fiber property and integral extension.Characterize integral extension of rings by maximal idealsMaximal ideal of $K[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ such that the quotient field equals to $K$
$begingroup$
The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.
Exercise 1.2.
Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.
The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.
Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatorname{Spec} B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatorname{Spec}(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^{−1}(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ{−1}(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.
In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.
Exercise 1.2.
Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.
The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.
Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatorname{Spec} B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatorname{Spec}(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^{−1}(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ{−1}(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.
In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.
Exercise 1.2.
Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.
The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.
Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatorname{Spec} B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatorname{Spec}(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^{−1}(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ{−1}(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.
In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra
$endgroup$
The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.
Exercise 1.2.
Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.
The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.
Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatorname{Spec} B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatorname{Spec}(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^{−1}(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ{−1}(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.
In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra
abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra
asked 1 hour ago
zxcvzxcv
1609
1609
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.
Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).
Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.
We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$
In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that
$F subset D subset E; tag 1$
since
$[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$
every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus
$0 ne d in D tag 3$
satisfies some
$p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$
that is,
$p(d) = 0; tag 5$
we may write
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$
then
$displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$
furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have
$p_0 ne 0; tag 8$
if not, then
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_jx^j = x sum_1^{deg p} p_j x^{j - 1}; tag 9$
thus
$d displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{10}$
and via (4) this forces
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{11}$
since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_ x^{j - 1} in F[x] tag{12}$
of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p}p_j d^j = -p_0, tag{13}$
or
$d left( -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} right ) = 1, tag{14}$
which shows that
$d^{-1} = -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} in D; tag{15}$
since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161381%2fwhy-does-the-integral-domain-being-trapped-between-a-finite-field-extension-im%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.
Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).
Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.
We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$
In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.
Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).
Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.
We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$
In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.
Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).
Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.
We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$
In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.
$endgroup$
Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.
Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).
Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.
We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$
In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.
answered 36 mins ago
darij grinbergdarij grinberg
11.2k33167
11.2k33167
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that
$F subset D subset E; tag 1$
since
$[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$
every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus
$0 ne d in D tag 3$
satisfies some
$p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$
that is,
$p(d) = 0; tag 5$
we may write
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$
then
$displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$
furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have
$p_0 ne 0; tag 8$
if not, then
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_jx^j = x sum_1^{deg p} p_j x^{j - 1}; tag 9$
thus
$d displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{10}$
and via (4) this forces
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{11}$
since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_ x^{j - 1} in F[x] tag{12}$
of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p}p_j d^j = -p_0, tag{13}$
or
$d left( -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} right ) = 1, tag{14}$
which shows that
$d^{-1} = -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} in D; tag{15}$
since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that
$F subset D subset E; tag 1$
since
$[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$
every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus
$0 ne d in D tag 3$
satisfies some
$p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$
that is,
$p(d) = 0; tag 5$
we may write
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$
then
$displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$
furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have
$p_0 ne 0; tag 8$
if not, then
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_jx^j = x sum_1^{deg p} p_j x^{j - 1}; tag 9$
thus
$d displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{10}$
and via (4) this forces
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{11}$
since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_ x^{j - 1} in F[x] tag{12}$
of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p}p_j d^j = -p_0, tag{13}$
or
$d left( -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} right ) = 1, tag{14}$
which shows that
$d^{-1} = -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} in D; tag{15}$
since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that
$F subset D subset E; tag 1$
since
$[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$
every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus
$0 ne d in D tag 3$
satisfies some
$p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$
that is,
$p(d) = 0; tag 5$
we may write
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$
then
$displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$
furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have
$p_0 ne 0; tag 8$
if not, then
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_jx^j = x sum_1^{deg p} p_j x^{j - 1}; tag 9$
thus
$d displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{10}$
and via (4) this forces
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{11}$
since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_ x^{j - 1} in F[x] tag{12}$
of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p}p_j d^j = -p_0, tag{13}$
or
$d left( -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} right ) = 1, tag{14}$
which shows that
$d^{-1} = -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} in D; tag{15}$
since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.
$endgroup$
Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that
$F subset D subset E; tag 1$
since
$[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$
every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus
$0 ne d in D tag 3$
satisfies some
$p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$
that is,
$p(d) = 0; tag 5$
we may write
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$
then
$displaystyle sum_0^{deg p} p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$
furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have
$p_0 ne 0; tag 8$
if not, then
$p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_jx^j = x sum_1^{deg p} p_j x^{j - 1}; tag 9$
thus
$d displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{10}$
and via (4) this forces
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j - 1} = 0, tag{11}$
since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_ x^{j - 1} in F[x] tag{12}$
of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write
$displaystyle sum_1^{deg p}p_j d^j = -p_0, tag{13}$
or
$d left( -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} right ) = 1, tag{14}$
which shows that
$d^{-1} = -p_0^{-1}displaystyle sum_1^{deg p} p_j d^{j- 1} in D; tag{15}$
since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.
answered 33 mins ago
Robert LewisRobert Lewis
48.3k23167
48.3k23167
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161381%2fwhy-does-the-integral-domain-being-trapped-between-a-finite-field-extension-im%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown