Finding angle with pure Geometry.perimeter of square inscribed in the triagleTricky pure geometry proofSolid...
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
tikz: show 0 at the axis origin
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?
Why, historically, did Gödel think CH was false?
Finding the repeating unit of polymerisation given two constituent molecules
can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?
Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
Show that if two triangles built on parallel lines, with equal bases have the same perimeter only if they are congruent.
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
How to format long polynomial?
TGV timetables / schedules?
Test whether all array elements are factors of a number
Why not use SQL instead of GraphQL?
Adding span tags within wp_list_pages list items
What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)
What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?
Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?
Finding angle with pure Geometry.
perimeter of square inscribed in the triagleTricky pure geometry proofSolid Geometry. Finding an angleGeometry- finding the measure of the angleTwo tangent circles inscribed in a rectangle (Compute the area)Geometry: Finding an angle of a trapezoidFinding angle and radius. Geometry/Trig applicationGeometry (Finding angle $x$)Foundations and Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics, Chapter Problems (1.1.3)Find the two missing angles in a quadrilateral
$begingroup$
Each side of a square ABCD has a length of 1 unit. Points P and Q belong to AB and DA respectively. The perimeter of triangle APQ is 2 units. What will be the angle of PCQ.
I was able to do this with simple trignometry and found it to be 45 degrees but the book I am reading doesn't yet talked about trignometry or similarity of triangle so I want rather pure geometric proof which doesn't include trigonometry or similarity of triangle concepts.
geometry euclidean-geometry
asked 2 hours ago
Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma
1286
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Each side of a square ABCD has a length of 1 unit. Points P and Q belong to AB and DA respectively. The perimeter of triangle APQ is 2 units. What will be the angle of PCQ.
I was able to do this with simple trignometry and found it to be 45 degrees but the book I am reading doesn't yet talked about trignometry or similarity of triangle so I want rather pure geometric proof which doesn't include trigonometry or similarity of triangle concepts.
geometry euclidean-geometry
asked 2 hours ago
Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma
1286
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Each side of a square ABCD has a length of 1 unit. Points P and Q belong to AB and DA respectively. The perimeter of triangle APQ is 2 units. What will be the angle of PCQ.
I was able to do this with simple trignometry and found it to be 45 degrees but the book I am reading doesn't yet talked about trignometry or similarity of triangle so I want rather pure geometric proof which doesn't include trigonometry or similarity of triangle concepts.
geometry euclidean-geometry
asked 2 hours ago
Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma
1286
$endgroup$
Each side of a square ABCD has a length of 1 unit. Points P and Q belong to AB and DA respectively. The perimeter of triangle APQ is 2 units. What will be the angle of PCQ.
I was able to do this with simple trignometry and found it to be 45 degrees but the book I am reading doesn't yet talked about trignometry or similarity of triangle so I want rather pure geometric proof which doesn't include trigonometry or similarity of triangle concepts.
geometry euclidean-geometry
geometry euclidean-geometry
asked 2 hours ago
Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma
1286
asked 2 hours ago
Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma
1286
asked 2 hours ago
Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma
1286
asked 2 hours ago
Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma
1286
asked 2 hours ago
Keshav SharmaKeshav Sharma
1286
1286
$begingroup$
Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)
Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.
So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.
The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:
$$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$
answered 35 mins ago
OldboyOldboy
9,37911138
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$
answered 20 mins ago
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
49.9k1361124
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you provide a picture?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177296%2ffinding-angle-with-pure-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)
Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.
So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.
The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:
$$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$
answered 35 mins ago
OldboyOldboy
9,37911138
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)
Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.
So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.
The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:
$$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$
answered 35 mins ago
OldboyOldboy
9,37911138
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)
Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.
So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.
The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:
$$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$
answered 35 mins ago
OldboyOldboy
9,37911138
$endgroup$
(I apologize for replacing points $PQ$ with $EF$, I'm too tired to draw the picture again :)
Draw circle with center $E$ and radius $EB$ and circle with center $F$ and radius $FD$. These circles intersect segment $EF$ at points $G',G''$ These points are identical! Why?
Because perimeter of triangle $AEF$ is 2 which is $AB+AD=AE+EB+AF+FD=AE+EG'+AF+FG''$. It means that $EG'+FG''=EF$ and therefore $G'equiv G''equiv Gin EF$.
So these two circles touch at point $G$ as shown in the picture. Power of point $C$ with respect to both circles is equal $(CB=CD)$ and therefore it has to be on the radical axis of the circles. These circles touch at point $G$ and their radical axis is defined by the common tangent at point $G$. Becuase of that $CG$ must be tangent to both circles and, at the same time, $CGbot EF$.
The rest is trivial: you can easily show that triangles $FCD$ and $FCG$ are congruent. The same is true for triangles $ECG$ and $ECB$. Because of that:
$$angle ECF=frac12angle BCG+frac 12angle GCD=45^circ$$
answered 35 mins ago
OldboyOldboy
9,37911138
answered 35 mins ago
OldboyOldboy
9,37911138
answered 35 mins ago
OldboyOldboy
9,37911138
answered 35 mins ago
OldboyOldboy
9,37911138
9,37911138
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$
answered 20 mins ago
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
49.9k1361124
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you provide a picture?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$
answered 20 mins ago
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
49.9k1361124
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you provide a picture?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$
answered 20 mins ago
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
49.9k1361124
$endgroup$
Rotate $Q$ for $90^{circ}$ around $C$ in to new point $E$. Then $P,B,E$ are collinear and $PB = PQ$. So triangles $CQP$ and $CEP$ are congruent by (sss), so $$angle QCP = angle ECP = 45^{circ}$$
answered 20 mins ago
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
49.9k1361124
edited 12 mins ago
answered 20 mins ago
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
49.9k1361124
answered 20 mins ago
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
49.9k1361124
answered 20 mins ago
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
49.9k1361124
49.9k1361124
$begingroup$
Could you provide a picture?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
5 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you provide a picture?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
5 mins ago
$begingroup$
Could you provide a picture?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Could you provide a picture?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
5 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva It is not a difficult to do it your self. Just rotate the $F$ (instead of $Q$) in oldboys picture.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177296%2ffinding-angle-with-pure-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Let $AQ=x,AP=y.$ Then you can find that $2x+2y=xy+2,$ which has infinitely many solutions for $0 < x,y leq 1.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
1 hour ago