Fired for using Stack Exchange. What did I do wrong?2019 Community Moderator ElectionGetting fired for...
multiple null checks in Java8
Stream.findFirst different than Optional.of?
Why do BLDC motor (1 kW) controllers have so many MOSFETs?
How to achieve gender equality in physical?
Does an intelligent undead have a soul in 5e D&D?
Could Comets or Meteors be used to Combat Global Warming?
Will linear voltage regulator step up current?
How to play songs that contain one guitar when we have two or more guitarists?
Someone wants me to use my credit card at a card-only gas/petrol pump in return for cash
How does the income of your target audience matter for logo design?
How to encircle section of matrix in LaTeX?
Short story where Earth is given a racist governor who likes species of a certain color
Does the kobold player race feature, Pack Tactics, give ranged attacks advantage?
Is it possible to detect 100% of SQLi with a simple regex?
Manager has noticed coworker's excessive breaks. Should I warn him?
How to know if I am a 'Real Developer'
How do I add a strong "onion flavor" to the biryani (in restaurant style)?
Is it ethical to apply for a job on someone's behalf?
How can guns be countered by melee combat without raw-ability or exceptional explanations?
Why is Bernie Sanders maximum accepted donation on actblue $5600?
Is it common to refer to someone as "Prof. Dr. [LastName]"?
How to write painful torture scenes without being over-the-top
Buying a "Used" Router
Can I use a larger HVAC Hard Start kit than is recommended?
Fired for using Stack Exchange. What did I do wrong?
2019 Community Moderator ElectionGetting fired for cause?Why did I get fired right before my last day?About to get fired. What should I do?How can I explain having been fired for stealing?Fired for Bad AttitudeBlaming previous employer during interview for being firedCan I be fired for something I did before I was hired?Fired on my 2nd day at work…what can I do?Fired for doing disallowed web searches; how can I show it was outside my control?Fired for “breach of privacy”
Yesterday, my boss called me into his office and said I was being let go. He told me that it was because I had been posting information about my company online. I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange, because this is the only real site I use. (Don't worry; I secretly hate my job and am glad this is finally the kick I need to find something new.)
What's really puzzled me, though, is that I don't think I ever posted any information (damaging or non-damaging) that would lead back to my employer. I'm a semi-regular poster (created this temporary account for obvious reason) and have posted several things here on Workplace. I've asked questions about my workplace environment and employer, but I have never, ever:
- Named my company
- Used real names of anybody in my company
- Posted anything from my work computer
- Given anything that would lead back to my company
I have, however, posted a question about a specific individual I worked with. You would never figure out who they were by reading my post unless you personally knew me (and then you could probably figure it out). I never browse stack exchange from my work computer, but I do sometimes access it from my personal phone. I'm guessing my manager must have overseen what I was reading on my phone.
I feel funny asking this now, but I've got such great advice from this community in the past: what did I do wrong? Other than avoiding browsing Workplace Stack Exchange while I'm the clock, is there anything I can do differently next time so as to not get in trouble? Or is it better just avoiding ever posting anything person?
termination
New contributor
add a comment |
Yesterday, my boss called me into his office and said I was being let go. He told me that it was because I had been posting information about my company online. I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange, because this is the only real site I use. (Don't worry; I secretly hate my job and am glad this is finally the kick I need to find something new.)
What's really puzzled me, though, is that I don't think I ever posted any information (damaging or non-damaging) that would lead back to my employer. I'm a semi-regular poster (created this temporary account for obvious reason) and have posted several things here on Workplace. I've asked questions about my workplace environment and employer, but I have never, ever:
- Named my company
- Used real names of anybody in my company
- Posted anything from my work computer
- Given anything that would lead back to my company
I have, however, posted a question about a specific individual I worked with. You would never figure out who they were by reading my post unless you personally knew me (and then you could probably figure it out). I never browse stack exchange from my work computer, but I do sometimes access it from my personal phone. I'm guessing my manager must have overseen what I was reading on my phone.
I feel funny asking this now, but I've got such great advice from this community in the past: what did I do wrong? Other than avoiding browsing Workplace Stack Exchange while I'm the clock, is there anything I can do differently next time so as to not get in trouble? Or is it better just avoiding ever posting anything person?
termination
New contributor
30
He fired you and you didn't even ask exactly what he was firing you for?
– solarflare
6 hours ago
13
The main thing you did wrong is: you didn't ask him what he was talking about. You even aren't sure it really was your posting he found somewhere? Perhaps someone else's posting fires back to you, either unwanted or on purpose. For now you silently admitted something you don't know. You definitely should find out what was going on.
– puck
4 hours ago
2
Voted to close, because if you don't know what exactly you were fired for, there is no way we can suggest a way to avoid that.
– nvoigt
3 hours ago
5
That's what I'd call a straight-to-HNQ-title.
– DonQuiKong
1 hour ago
A country tag would be helpful
– P. Hopkinson
1 min ago
add a comment |
Yesterday, my boss called me into his office and said I was being let go. He told me that it was because I had been posting information about my company online. I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange, because this is the only real site I use. (Don't worry; I secretly hate my job and am glad this is finally the kick I need to find something new.)
What's really puzzled me, though, is that I don't think I ever posted any information (damaging or non-damaging) that would lead back to my employer. I'm a semi-regular poster (created this temporary account for obvious reason) and have posted several things here on Workplace. I've asked questions about my workplace environment and employer, but I have never, ever:
- Named my company
- Used real names of anybody in my company
- Posted anything from my work computer
- Given anything that would lead back to my company
I have, however, posted a question about a specific individual I worked with. You would never figure out who they were by reading my post unless you personally knew me (and then you could probably figure it out). I never browse stack exchange from my work computer, but I do sometimes access it from my personal phone. I'm guessing my manager must have overseen what I was reading on my phone.
I feel funny asking this now, but I've got such great advice from this community in the past: what did I do wrong? Other than avoiding browsing Workplace Stack Exchange while I'm the clock, is there anything I can do differently next time so as to not get in trouble? Or is it better just avoiding ever posting anything person?
termination
New contributor
Yesterday, my boss called me into his office and said I was being let go. He told me that it was because I had been posting information about my company online. I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange, because this is the only real site I use. (Don't worry; I secretly hate my job and am glad this is finally the kick I need to find something new.)
What's really puzzled me, though, is that I don't think I ever posted any information (damaging or non-damaging) that would lead back to my employer. I'm a semi-regular poster (created this temporary account for obvious reason) and have posted several things here on Workplace. I've asked questions about my workplace environment and employer, but I have never, ever:
- Named my company
- Used real names of anybody in my company
- Posted anything from my work computer
- Given anything that would lead back to my company
I have, however, posted a question about a specific individual I worked with. You would never figure out who they were by reading my post unless you personally knew me (and then you could probably figure it out). I never browse stack exchange from my work computer, but I do sometimes access it from my personal phone. I'm guessing my manager must have overseen what I was reading on my phone.
I feel funny asking this now, but I've got such great advice from this community in the past: what did I do wrong? Other than avoiding browsing Workplace Stack Exchange while I'm the clock, is there anything I can do differently next time so as to not get in trouble? Or is it better just avoiding ever posting anything person?
termination
termination
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 6 hours ago
LookingForAJobLookingForAJob
6813
6813
New contributor
New contributor
30
He fired you and you didn't even ask exactly what he was firing you for?
– solarflare
6 hours ago
13
The main thing you did wrong is: you didn't ask him what he was talking about. You even aren't sure it really was your posting he found somewhere? Perhaps someone else's posting fires back to you, either unwanted or on purpose. For now you silently admitted something you don't know. You definitely should find out what was going on.
– puck
4 hours ago
2
Voted to close, because if you don't know what exactly you were fired for, there is no way we can suggest a way to avoid that.
– nvoigt
3 hours ago
5
That's what I'd call a straight-to-HNQ-title.
– DonQuiKong
1 hour ago
A country tag would be helpful
– P. Hopkinson
1 min ago
add a comment |
30
He fired you and you didn't even ask exactly what he was firing you for?
– solarflare
6 hours ago
13
The main thing you did wrong is: you didn't ask him what he was talking about. You even aren't sure it really was your posting he found somewhere? Perhaps someone else's posting fires back to you, either unwanted or on purpose. For now you silently admitted something you don't know. You definitely should find out what was going on.
– puck
4 hours ago
2
Voted to close, because if you don't know what exactly you were fired for, there is no way we can suggest a way to avoid that.
– nvoigt
3 hours ago
5
That's what I'd call a straight-to-HNQ-title.
– DonQuiKong
1 hour ago
A country tag would be helpful
– P. Hopkinson
1 min ago
30
30
He fired you and you didn't even ask exactly what he was firing you for?
– solarflare
6 hours ago
He fired you and you didn't even ask exactly what he was firing you for?
– solarflare
6 hours ago
13
13
The main thing you did wrong is: you didn't ask him what he was talking about. You even aren't sure it really was your posting he found somewhere? Perhaps someone else's posting fires back to you, either unwanted or on purpose. For now you silently admitted something you don't know. You definitely should find out what was going on.
– puck
4 hours ago
The main thing you did wrong is: you didn't ask him what he was talking about. You even aren't sure it really was your posting he found somewhere? Perhaps someone else's posting fires back to you, either unwanted or on purpose. For now you silently admitted something you don't know. You definitely should find out what was going on.
– puck
4 hours ago
2
2
Voted to close, because if you don't know what exactly you were fired for, there is no way we can suggest a way to avoid that.
– nvoigt
3 hours ago
Voted to close, because if you don't know what exactly you were fired for, there is no way we can suggest a way to avoid that.
– nvoigt
3 hours ago
5
5
That's what I'd call a straight-to-HNQ-title.
– DonQuiKong
1 hour ago
That's what I'd call a straight-to-HNQ-title.
– DonQuiKong
1 hour ago
A country tag would be helpful
– P. Hopkinson
1 min ago
A country tag would be helpful
– P. Hopkinson
1 min ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange
If you want to know, don't assume, find out. From the question you never posted about your workplace here, or even accessed the site from your work computer. So either you're not telling us something or more probably assuming wrongly.
9
Also in many countries firing some-one on such "basis" would be a straight way to a court. Ask the employee to be specific, which entries had made him fire you and why.
– Ister
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Nobody "secretly hates [their] job." Your attitude shows in behavior, work performance, comments to other employees (which you are assuming never got back to your employer — that's a bad assumption), comments to friends who may also know people you work with, etc. Our world is really, really, really, really small and hiding basic behavioral traits in a public setting is nigh impossible.
If your company doesn't have a policy permitting personal browsing (you didn't say) and you were browsing Stack Exchange or any other website not 100% for the purpose of your employment during work hours.... That's bad juju. If you did and happen to be thinking that no one ever saw you or that it couldn't get back to your employer, then re-read #1.
If you posted about an individual at your company and assumed that no one else in your network of co-workers, friends, associates, etc. have (a) never heard you speak about that individual and (b) don't also use this website... please read #1 again.
You've provided nowhere near enough detail about how your termination was actually decided to know what's going on (from our point of view). Had another employee posted on their Facebook page that they thought you were posting about the company anywhere... there you go. If you really don't know the details about the nature of the post that got you fired then (a) pay better attention, (b) care more about what happens to you, (c) care more about how your company operates, and (d) care more about how your coworkers network.
There are dozens more "what can I do" responses. Some trivial (e.g, "don't complain about your job."), some not (e.g., "trust no one"), but I'll leave you with one more. Choose to be self-protective. Perhaps you should have responded to your employer's announcement with, "I would like a copy of what you believe was my post and a justification for why you believe that expression of free speech — if it was mine — constituted a violation of work ethics, my contract with you, or in any way jeopardized this company's operations. If I walk out of this office without that information in writing you will be hearing from my attorney."
After all, unless you've left something out of the story, it sounds like your employer didn't give you a warning (like sitting you down and explaining, "you know, this isn't very nice of you... how can we work this out?"), and that leaves them open for all kinds of problems.
"If you were browsing [...] during work hours.... That's bad juju" - not sure I necessarily agree with this. A lot of companies now recognise the benefit that relaxation can give to their employees' productivity. This may or may not be the case at OP's company but I don't think it's something that you can generalise in such a way.
– James Monger
23 mins ago
@JamesMonger, you've made a good point, I should have stated that if it's against company policies and... blah blah blah. I'll make that correction now. Thanks for pointing that out.
– JBH
15 mins ago
Point 1 is blatantly false, many people can perfectly hide how they feel about their job. A professional employee will just perform adequately and look for new opportunities, only if you truly resent your job and it's making you unhappy you'll have trouble hiding it. This is a case of confirmation bias, where every time you noticed someone hating their job that was because they couldn't or didn't hide it, and so you now think no one can hide it, but I guarantee you there are under the radar haters too.
– Kevin
4 mins ago
add a comment |
If I had to guess, I'd say either: (A) He wanted to fire you anyway and this was just the excuse he came up with or (B) He actually did stumble upon one of your posts saying negative things about the job and decided to take it personally. The only way to know for sure would be to ask "What post are you referring to?" The only other precaution I can think of for you to take would be to never say anything about your job online.
add a comment |
With all the details that have mentioned in the post (as of this moment, when I post), it may not necessarily be a case of posting/not-posting anything which brings your employer into disrepute or does any harm. (i.e. If you are absolutely sure you did not.)
It may simply be case of the time taken scrolling or contributing to SE during your office time being interpreted as an unproductive wastage of time, when you were expected to be engaged in office chores.
However, I don't think that merely this, in isolation, can be a potent enough reason to take a drastic step such as firing someone. This may (likely) have been an addendum, maybe there were other factors, which gradually accumulated, that any SE-related incident may have been the proverbial last-straw-that-breaks-the-camel's-back. Maybe, they were assessing people's bad performances, and then they witnessed you scrolling SE. That would be a perfect trigger.
At any rate, do not assume good/bad intentions. They definitely owe you an explanation, there may be legal consequences (depending on the local culture) if this is an arbitrary action on the part of the employer. Also, they can not misrepresent the reason, if it is due to under-performance, they have to declare that. If they say you posted information about the company, it is reasonable to expect them to substantiate this part.
You should ask them, explicitly. (Also, if you wanted out of this job, what do you have to lose, anyways.)
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
LookingForAJob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129759%2ffired-for-using-stack-exchange-what-did-i-do-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange
If you want to know, don't assume, find out. From the question you never posted about your workplace here, or even accessed the site from your work computer. So either you're not telling us something or more probably assuming wrongly.
9
Also in many countries firing some-one on such "basis" would be a straight way to a court. Ask the employee to be specific, which entries had made him fire you and why.
– Ister
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange
If you want to know, don't assume, find out. From the question you never posted about your workplace here, or even accessed the site from your work computer. So either you're not telling us something or more probably assuming wrongly.
9
Also in many countries firing some-one on such "basis" would be a straight way to a court. Ask the employee to be specific, which entries had made him fire you and why.
– Ister
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange
If you want to know, don't assume, find out. From the question you never posted about your workplace here, or even accessed the site from your work computer. So either you're not telling us something or more probably assuming wrongly.
I presume he means Workplace Stack Exchange
If you want to know, don't assume, find out. From the question you never posted about your workplace here, or even accessed the site from your work computer. So either you're not telling us something or more probably assuming wrongly.
answered 6 hours ago
KilisiKilisi
119k68264458
119k68264458
9
Also in many countries firing some-one on such "basis" would be a straight way to a court. Ask the employee to be specific, which entries had made him fire you and why.
– Ister
2 hours ago
add a comment |
9
Also in many countries firing some-one on such "basis" would be a straight way to a court. Ask the employee to be specific, which entries had made him fire you and why.
– Ister
2 hours ago
9
9
Also in many countries firing some-one on such "basis" would be a straight way to a court. Ask the employee to be specific, which entries had made him fire you and why.
– Ister
2 hours ago
Also in many countries firing some-one on such "basis" would be a straight way to a court. Ask the employee to be specific, which entries had made him fire you and why.
– Ister
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Nobody "secretly hates [their] job." Your attitude shows in behavior, work performance, comments to other employees (which you are assuming never got back to your employer — that's a bad assumption), comments to friends who may also know people you work with, etc. Our world is really, really, really, really small and hiding basic behavioral traits in a public setting is nigh impossible.
If your company doesn't have a policy permitting personal browsing (you didn't say) and you were browsing Stack Exchange or any other website not 100% for the purpose of your employment during work hours.... That's bad juju. If you did and happen to be thinking that no one ever saw you or that it couldn't get back to your employer, then re-read #1.
If you posted about an individual at your company and assumed that no one else in your network of co-workers, friends, associates, etc. have (a) never heard you speak about that individual and (b) don't also use this website... please read #1 again.
You've provided nowhere near enough detail about how your termination was actually decided to know what's going on (from our point of view). Had another employee posted on their Facebook page that they thought you were posting about the company anywhere... there you go. If you really don't know the details about the nature of the post that got you fired then (a) pay better attention, (b) care more about what happens to you, (c) care more about how your company operates, and (d) care more about how your coworkers network.
There are dozens more "what can I do" responses. Some trivial (e.g, "don't complain about your job."), some not (e.g., "trust no one"), but I'll leave you with one more. Choose to be self-protective. Perhaps you should have responded to your employer's announcement with, "I would like a copy of what you believe was my post and a justification for why you believe that expression of free speech — if it was mine — constituted a violation of work ethics, my contract with you, or in any way jeopardized this company's operations. If I walk out of this office without that information in writing you will be hearing from my attorney."
After all, unless you've left something out of the story, it sounds like your employer didn't give you a warning (like sitting you down and explaining, "you know, this isn't very nice of you... how can we work this out?"), and that leaves them open for all kinds of problems.
"If you were browsing [...] during work hours.... That's bad juju" - not sure I necessarily agree with this. A lot of companies now recognise the benefit that relaxation can give to their employees' productivity. This may or may not be the case at OP's company but I don't think it's something that you can generalise in such a way.
– James Monger
23 mins ago
@JamesMonger, you've made a good point, I should have stated that if it's against company policies and... blah blah blah. I'll make that correction now. Thanks for pointing that out.
– JBH
15 mins ago
Point 1 is blatantly false, many people can perfectly hide how they feel about their job. A professional employee will just perform adequately and look for new opportunities, only if you truly resent your job and it's making you unhappy you'll have trouble hiding it. This is a case of confirmation bias, where every time you noticed someone hating their job that was because they couldn't or didn't hide it, and so you now think no one can hide it, but I guarantee you there are under the radar haters too.
– Kevin
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Nobody "secretly hates [their] job." Your attitude shows in behavior, work performance, comments to other employees (which you are assuming never got back to your employer — that's a bad assumption), comments to friends who may also know people you work with, etc. Our world is really, really, really, really small and hiding basic behavioral traits in a public setting is nigh impossible.
If your company doesn't have a policy permitting personal browsing (you didn't say) and you were browsing Stack Exchange or any other website not 100% for the purpose of your employment during work hours.... That's bad juju. If you did and happen to be thinking that no one ever saw you or that it couldn't get back to your employer, then re-read #1.
If you posted about an individual at your company and assumed that no one else in your network of co-workers, friends, associates, etc. have (a) never heard you speak about that individual and (b) don't also use this website... please read #1 again.
You've provided nowhere near enough detail about how your termination was actually decided to know what's going on (from our point of view). Had another employee posted on their Facebook page that they thought you were posting about the company anywhere... there you go. If you really don't know the details about the nature of the post that got you fired then (a) pay better attention, (b) care more about what happens to you, (c) care more about how your company operates, and (d) care more about how your coworkers network.
There are dozens more "what can I do" responses. Some trivial (e.g, "don't complain about your job."), some not (e.g., "trust no one"), but I'll leave you with one more. Choose to be self-protective. Perhaps you should have responded to your employer's announcement with, "I would like a copy of what you believe was my post and a justification for why you believe that expression of free speech — if it was mine — constituted a violation of work ethics, my contract with you, or in any way jeopardized this company's operations. If I walk out of this office without that information in writing you will be hearing from my attorney."
After all, unless you've left something out of the story, it sounds like your employer didn't give you a warning (like sitting you down and explaining, "you know, this isn't very nice of you... how can we work this out?"), and that leaves them open for all kinds of problems.
"If you were browsing [...] during work hours.... That's bad juju" - not sure I necessarily agree with this. A lot of companies now recognise the benefit that relaxation can give to their employees' productivity. This may or may not be the case at OP's company but I don't think it's something that you can generalise in such a way.
– James Monger
23 mins ago
@JamesMonger, you've made a good point, I should have stated that if it's against company policies and... blah blah blah. I'll make that correction now. Thanks for pointing that out.
– JBH
15 mins ago
Point 1 is blatantly false, many people can perfectly hide how they feel about their job. A professional employee will just perform adequately and look for new opportunities, only if you truly resent your job and it's making you unhappy you'll have trouble hiding it. This is a case of confirmation bias, where every time you noticed someone hating their job that was because they couldn't or didn't hide it, and so you now think no one can hide it, but I guarantee you there are under the radar haters too.
– Kevin
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Nobody "secretly hates [their] job." Your attitude shows in behavior, work performance, comments to other employees (which you are assuming never got back to your employer — that's a bad assumption), comments to friends who may also know people you work with, etc. Our world is really, really, really, really small and hiding basic behavioral traits in a public setting is nigh impossible.
If your company doesn't have a policy permitting personal browsing (you didn't say) and you were browsing Stack Exchange or any other website not 100% for the purpose of your employment during work hours.... That's bad juju. If you did and happen to be thinking that no one ever saw you or that it couldn't get back to your employer, then re-read #1.
If you posted about an individual at your company and assumed that no one else in your network of co-workers, friends, associates, etc. have (a) never heard you speak about that individual and (b) don't also use this website... please read #1 again.
You've provided nowhere near enough detail about how your termination was actually decided to know what's going on (from our point of view). Had another employee posted on their Facebook page that they thought you were posting about the company anywhere... there you go. If you really don't know the details about the nature of the post that got you fired then (a) pay better attention, (b) care more about what happens to you, (c) care more about how your company operates, and (d) care more about how your coworkers network.
There are dozens more "what can I do" responses. Some trivial (e.g, "don't complain about your job."), some not (e.g., "trust no one"), but I'll leave you with one more. Choose to be self-protective. Perhaps you should have responded to your employer's announcement with, "I would like a copy of what you believe was my post and a justification for why you believe that expression of free speech — if it was mine — constituted a violation of work ethics, my contract with you, or in any way jeopardized this company's operations. If I walk out of this office without that information in writing you will be hearing from my attorney."
After all, unless you've left something out of the story, it sounds like your employer didn't give you a warning (like sitting you down and explaining, "you know, this isn't very nice of you... how can we work this out?"), and that leaves them open for all kinds of problems.
Nobody "secretly hates [their] job." Your attitude shows in behavior, work performance, comments to other employees (which you are assuming never got back to your employer — that's a bad assumption), comments to friends who may also know people you work with, etc. Our world is really, really, really, really small and hiding basic behavioral traits in a public setting is nigh impossible.
If your company doesn't have a policy permitting personal browsing (you didn't say) and you were browsing Stack Exchange or any other website not 100% for the purpose of your employment during work hours.... That's bad juju. If you did and happen to be thinking that no one ever saw you or that it couldn't get back to your employer, then re-read #1.
If you posted about an individual at your company and assumed that no one else in your network of co-workers, friends, associates, etc. have (a) never heard you speak about that individual and (b) don't also use this website... please read #1 again.
You've provided nowhere near enough detail about how your termination was actually decided to know what's going on (from our point of view). Had another employee posted on their Facebook page that they thought you were posting about the company anywhere... there you go. If you really don't know the details about the nature of the post that got you fired then (a) pay better attention, (b) care more about what happens to you, (c) care more about how your company operates, and (d) care more about how your coworkers network.
There are dozens more "what can I do" responses. Some trivial (e.g, "don't complain about your job."), some not (e.g., "trust no one"), but I'll leave you with one more. Choose to be self-protective. Perhaps you should have responded to your employer's announcement with, "I would like a copy of what you believe was my post and a justification for why you believe that expression of free speech — if it was mine — constituted a violation of work ethics, my contract with you, or in any way jeopardized this company's operations. If I walk out of this office without that information in writing you will be hearing from my attorney."
After all, unless you've left something out of the story, it sounds like your employer didn't give you a warning (like sitting you down and explaining, "you know, this isn't very nice of you... how can we work this out?"), and that leaves them open for all kinds of problems.
edited 14 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
JBHJBH
2,0641420
2,0641420
"If you were browsing [...] during work hours.... That's bad juju" - not sure I necessarily agree with this. A lot of companies now recognise the benefit that relaxation can give to their employees' productivity. This may or may not be the case at OP's company but I don't think it's something that you can generalise in such a way.
– James Monger
23 mins ago
@JamesMonger, you've made a good point, I should have stated that if it's against company policies and... blah blah blah. I'll make that correction now. Thanks for pointing that out.
– JBH
15 mins ago
Point 1 is blatantly false, many people can perfectly hide how they feel about their job. A professional employee will just perform adequately and look for new opportunities, only if you truly resent your job and it's making you unhappy you'll have trouble hiding it. This is a case of confirmation bias, where every time you noticed someone hating their job that was because they couldn't or didn't hide it, and so you now think no one can hide it, but I guarantee you there are under the radar haters too.
– Kevin
4 mins ago
add a comment |
"If you were browsing [...] during work hours.... That's bad juju" - not sure I necessarily agree with this. A lot of companies now recognise the benefit that relaxation can give to their employees' productivity. This may or may not be the case at OP's company but I don't think it's something that you can generalise in such a way.
– James Monger
23 mins ago
@JamesMonger, you've made a good point, I should have stated that if it's against company policies and... blah blah blah. I'll make that correction now. Thanks for pointing that out.
– JBH
15 mins ago
Point 1 is blatantly false, many people can perfectly hide how they feel about their job. A professional employee will just perform adequately and look for new opportunities, only if you truly resent your job and it's making you unhappy you'll have trouble hiding it. This is a case of confirmation bias, where every time you noticed someone hating their job that was because they couldn't or didn't hide it, and so you now think no one can hide it, but I guarantee you there are under the radar haters too.
– Kevin
4 mins ago
"If you were browsing [...] during work hours.... That's bad juju" - not sure I necessarily agree with this. A lot of companies now recognise the benefit that relaxation can give to their employees' productivity. This may or may not be the case at OP's company but I don't think it's something that you can generalise in such a way.
– James Monger
23 mins ago
"If you were browsing [...] during work hours.... That's bad juju" - not sure I necessarily agree with this. A lot of companies now recognise the benefit that relaxation can give to their employees' productivity. This may or may not be the case at OP's company but I don't think it's something that you can generalise in such a way.
– James Monger
23 mins ago
@JamesMonger, you've made a good point, I should have stated that if it's against company policies and... blah blah blah. I'll make that correction now. Thanks for pointing that out.
– JBH
15 mins ago
@JamesMonger, you've made a good point, I should have stated that if it's against company policies and... blah blah blah. I'll make that correction now. Thanks for pointing that out.
– JBH
15 mins ago
Point 1 is blatantly false, many people can perfectly hide how they feel about their job. A professional employee will just perform adequately and look for new opportunities, only if you truly resent your job and it's making you unhappy you'll have trouble hiding it. This is a case of confirmation bias, where every time you noticed someone hating their job that was because they couldn't or didn't hide it, and so you now think no one can hide it, but I guarantee you there are under the radar haters too.
– Kevin
4 mins ago
Point 1 is blatantly false, many people can perfectly hide how they feel about their job. A professional employee will just perform adequately and look for new opportunities, only if you truly resent your job and it's making you unhappy you'll have trouble hiding it. This is a case of confirmation bias, where every time you noticed someone hating their job that was because they couldn't or didn't hide it, and so you now think no one can hide it, but I guarantee you there are under the radar haters too.
– Kevin
4 mins ago
add a comment |
If I had to guess, I'd say either: (A) He wanted to fire you anyway and this was just the excuse he came up with or (B) He actually did stumble upon one of your posts saying negative things about the job and decided to take it personally. The only way to know for sure would be to ask "What post are you referring to?" The only other precaution I can think of for you to take would be to never say anything about your job online.
add a comment |
If I had to guess, I'd say either: (A) He wanted to fire you anyway and this was just the excuse he came up with or (B) He actually did stumble upon one of your posts saying negative things about the job and decided to take it personally. The only way to know for sure would be to ask "What post are you referring to?" The only other precaution I can think of for you to take would be to never say anything about your job online.
add a comment |
If I had to guess, I'd say either: (A) He wanted to fire you anyway and this was just the excuse he came up with or (B) He actually did stumble upon one of your posts saying negative things about the job and decided to take it personally. The only way to know for sure would be to ask "What post are you referring to?" The only other precaution I can think of for you to take would be to never say anything about your job online.
If I had to guess, I'd say either: (A) He wanted to fire you anyway and this was just the excuse he came up with or (B) He actually did stumble upon one of your posts saying negative things about the job and decided to take it personally. The only way to know for sure would be to ask "What post are you referring to?" The only other precaution I can think of for you to take would be to never say anything about your job online.
answered 5 hours ago
AffableAmblerAffableAmbler
4,51321025
4,51321025
add a comment |
add a comment |
With all the details that have mentioned in the post (as of this moment, when I post), it may not necessarily be a case of posting/not-posting anything which brings your employer into disrepute or does any harm. (i.e. If you are absolutely sure you did not.)
It may simply be case of the time taken scrolling or contributing to SE during your office time being interpreted as an unproductive wastage of time, when you were expected to be engaged in office chores.
However, I don't think that merely this, in isolation, can be a potent enough reason to take a drastic step such as firing someone. This may (likely) have been an addendum, maybe there were other factors, which gradually accumulated, that any SE-related incident may have been the proverbial last-straw-that-breaks-the-camel's-back. Maybe, they were assessing people's bad performances, and then they witnessed you scrolling SE. That would be a perfect trigger.
At any rate, do not assume good/bad intentions. They definitely owe you an explanation, there may be legal consequences (depending on the local culture) if this is an arbitrary action on the part of the employer. Also, they can not misrepresent the reason, if it is due to under-performance, they have to declare that. If they say you posted information about the company, it is reasonable to expect them to substantiate this part.
You should ask them, explicitly. (Also, if you wanted out of this job, what do you have to lose, anyways.)
New contributor
add a comment |
With all the details that have mentioned in the post (as of this moment, when I post), it may not necessarily be a case of posting/not-posting anything which brings your employer into disrepute or does any harm. (i.e. If you are absolutely sure you did not.)
It may simply be case of the time taken scrolling or contributing to SE during your office time being interpreted as an unproductive wastage of time, when you were expected to be engaged in office chores.
However, I don't think that merely this, in isolation, can be a potent enough reason to take a drastic step such as firing someone. This may (likely) have been an addendum, maybe there were other factors, which gradually accumulated, that any SE-related incident may have been the proverbial last-straw-that-breaks-the-camel's-back. Maybe, they were assessing people's bad performances, and then they witnessed you scrolling SE. That would be a perfect trigger.
At any rate, do not assume good/bad intentions. They definitely owe you an explanation, there may be legal consequences (depending on the local culture) if this is an arbitrary action on the part of the employer. Also, they can not misrepresent the reason, if it is due to under-performance, they have to declare that. If they say you posted information about the company, it is reasonable to expect them to substantiate this part.
You should ask them, explicitly. (Also, if you wanted out of this job, what do you have to lose, anyways.)
New contributor
add a comment |
With all the details that have mentioned in the post (as of this moment, when I post), it may not necessarily be a case of posting/not-posting anything which brings your employer into disrepute or does any harm. (i.e. If you are absolutely sure you did not.)
It may simply be case of the time taken scrolling or contributing to SE during your office time being interpreted as an unproductive wastage of time, when you were expected to be engaged in office chores.
However, I don't think that merely this, in isolation, can be a potent enough reason to take a drastic step such as firing someone. This may (likely) have been an addendum, maybe there were other factors, which gradually accumulated, that any SE-related incident may have been the proverbial last-straw-that-breaks-the-camel's-back. Maybe, they were assessing people's bad performances, and then they witnessed you scrolling SE. That would be a perfect trigger.
At any rate, do not assume good/bad intentions. They definitely owe you an explanation, there may be legal consequences (depending on the local culture) if this is an arbitrary action on the part of the employer. Also, they can not misrepresent the reason, if it is due to under-performance, they have to declare that. If they say you posted information about the company, it is reasonable to expect them to substantiate this part.
You should ask them, explicitly. (Also, if you wanted out of this job, what do you have to lose, anyways.)
New contributor
With all the details that have mentioned in the post (as of this moment, when I post), it may not necessarily be a case of posting/not-posting anything which brings your employer into disrepute or does any harm. (i.e. If you are absolutely sure you did not.)
It may simply be case of the time taken scrolling or contributing to SE during your office time being interpreted as an unproductive wastage of time, when you were expected to be engaged in office chores.
However, I don't think that merely this, in isolation, can be a potent enough reason to take a drastic step such as firing someone. This may (likely) have been an addendum, maybe there were other factors, which gradually accumulated, that any SE-related incident may have been the proverbial last-straw-that-breaks-the-camel's-back. Maybe, they were assessing people's bad performances, and then they witnessed you scrolling SE. That would be a perfect trigger.
At any rate, do not assume good/bad intentions. They definitely owe you an explanation, there may be legal consequences (depending on the local culture) if this is an arbitrary action on the part of the employer. Also, they can not misrepresent the reason, if it is due to under-performance, they have to declare that. If they say you posted information about the company, it is reasonable to expect them to substantiate this part.
You should ask them, explicitly. (Also, if you wanted out of this job, what do you have to lose, anyways.)
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
299792458299792458
1114
1114
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
LookingForAJob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LookingForAJob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LookingForAJob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LookingForAJob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129759%2ffired-for-using-stack-exchange-what-did-i-do-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
30
He fired you and you didn't even ask exactly what he was firing you for?
– solarflare
6 hours ago
13
The main thing you did wrong is: you didn't ask him what he was talking about. You even aren't sure it really was your posting he found somewhere? Perhaps someone else's posting fires back to you, either unwanted or on purpose. For now you silently admitted something you don't know. You definitely should find out what was going on.
– puck
4 hours ago
2
Voted to close, because if you don't know what exactly you were fired for, there is no way we can suggest a way to avoid that.
– nvoigt
3 hours ago
5
That's what I'd call a straight-to-HNQ-title.
– DonQuiKong
1 hour ago
A country tag would be helpful
– P. Hopkinson
1 min ago