Minimum energy path of a potential energy surfaceHow to apply restrictions to the “integrated” variable,...

Did the characters in Moving Pictures not know about cameras like Twoflower's?

What is the reason behind this musical reference to Pinocchio in the Close Encounters main theme?

Have any astronauts or cosmonauts died in space?

How do I write a maintainable, fast, compile-time bit-mask in C++?

Why do we divide Permutations to get to Combinations?

Isn't a semicolon (';') needed after a function declaration in C++?

Is Screenshot Time-tracking Common?

A cancellation property for permutations?

What does "don't have a baby" imply or mean in this sentence?

How can I make my enemies feel real and make combat more engaging?

Cryptic cross... with words

Why Doesn't It Completely Uninstall?

Variance of sine and cosine of a random variable

Is it possible to detect 100% of SQLi with a simple regex?

How can I portray body horror and still be sensitive to people with disabilities?

What happens if both players misunderstand the game state until it's too late?

80-bit collision resistence because of 80-bit x87 registers?

Given the mapping a = 1, b = 2, ... z = 26, and an encoded message, count the number of ways it can be decoded

Do error bars on probabilities have any meaning?

Have the UK Conservatives lost the working majority and if so, what does this mean?

What if you do not believe in the project benefits?

Not sure how to set up the Laplacian/Poisson Equation

Minimum energy path of a potential energy surface

Was Opportunity's last message to Earth "My battery is low and it's getting dark"?



Minimum energy path of a potential energy surface


How to apply restrictions to the “integrated” variable, when using NDSolve?Find all points that have the same minimum?FindMinimum function does not produce minimum from near pointHow to find the local minimum points in the multi-dimensional numerical data?Problem in finding the actual minimum of a rapidly varying functionHow to find a line which has the minimum total distance to separate two cluster pointsFinding the minima and the transition state in a potential energy surface (PES)Energy minimizationSymbolic solution for the energy of potential flowFinding minimum from ListPlot













6












$begingroup$


I have calculated the energies of a molecule by varying two parameters (Data points are here data). I want to find the minimum energy path from the point (180.0, 179.99, 21.132) to (124.5, 124.49, 0) using Mathematica.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "minimum energy path"? Assuming that your data represents the potential energy of the molecule, every path between two given states requires the same amount of enery. It's called the law of conservation of energy.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    20 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, after skimming a bit through the literature, "minimum energy path" seems to be a common notion in chemistry. But the sources I found (e.g., arxiv.org/abs/1802.05669, math.uni-leipzig.de/~quapp/wqTCA84.pdf) were very unclear, what exactly is supposed to be minimized... Probably, I will be able to help you after you have exactly specified the optimization problem that you want to have solved.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    18 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    So I think you want the steepest descent path, correct? Assuming the last point is at the bottom of the valley, so to speak.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    15 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenrikSchumacher If you plot the data provided and the two points, you obtain this plot; he wants to find the lowest-energy path on the surface that connects those two points, which in this case would be simply the steepest-descent path between the two.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarcoB Yeah, some authors interpret "minimum energy path" as the steepest-descent path. Others do not. So with all this ambiguity, it is in fact hard to help. I'm voting to close the post because of this. (I am going to redraw this vote when OP clarifies.)
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    14 hours ago


















6












$begingroup$


I have calculated the energies of a molecule by varying two parameters (Data points are here data). I want to find the minimum energy path from the point (180.0, 179.99, 21.132) to (124.5, 124.49, 0) using Mathematica.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "minimum energy path"? Assuming that your data represents the potential energy of the molecule, every path between two given states requires the same amount of enery. It's called the law of conservation of energy.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    20 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, after skimming a bit through the literature, "minimum energy path" seems to be a common notion in chemistry. But the sources I found (e.g., arxiv.org/abs/1802.05669, math.uni-leipzig.de/~quapp/wqTCA84.pdf) were very unclear, what exactly is supposed to be minimized... Probably, I will be able to help you after you have exactly specified the optimization problem that you want to have solved.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    18 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    So I think you want the steepest descent path, correct? Assuming the last point is at the bottom of the valley, so to speak.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    15 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenrikSchumacher If you plot the data provided and the two points, you obtain this plot; he wants to find the lowest-energy path on the surface that connects those two points, which in this case would be simply the steepest-descent path between the two.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarcoB Yeah, some authors interpret "minimum energy path" as the steepest-descent path. Others do not. So with all this ambiguity, it is in fact hard to help. I'm voting to close the post because of this. (I am going to redraw this vote when OP clarifies.)
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    14 hours ago
















6












6








6


2



$begingroup$


I have calculated the energies of a molecule by varying two parameters (Data points are here data). I want to find the minimum energy path from the point (180.0, 179.99, 21.132) to (124.5, 124.49, 0) using Mathematica.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have calculated the energies of a molecule by varying two parameters (Data points are here data). I want to find the minimum energy path from the point (180.0, 179.99, 21.132) to (124.5, 124.49, 0) using Mathematica.







differential-equations mathematical-optimization chemistry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 19 hours ago









Henrik Schumacher

54.2k472150




54.2k472150










asked 20 hours ago









sravankumar perumallasravankumar perumalla

1295




1295








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "minimum energy path"? Assuming that your data represents the potential energy of the molecule, every path between two given states requires the same amount of enery. It's called the law of conservation of energy.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    20 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, after skimming a bit through the literature, "minimum energy path" seems to be a common notion in chemistry. But the sources I found (e.g., arxiv.org/abs/1802.05669, math.uni-leipzig.de/~quapp/wqTCA84.pdf) were very unclear, what exactly is supposed to be minimized... Probably, I will be able to help you after you have exactly specified the optimization problem that you want to have solved.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    18 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    So I think you want the steepest descent path, correct? Assuming the last point is at the bottom of the valley, so to speak.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    15 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenrikSchumacher If you plot the data provided and the two points, you obtain this plot; he wants to find the lowest-energy path on the surface that connects those two points, which in this case would be simply the steepest-descent path between the two.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarcoB Yeah, some authors interpret "minimum energy path" as the steepest-descent path. Others do not. So with all this ambiguity, it is in fact hard to help. I'm voting to close the post because of this. (I am going to redraw this vote when OP clarifies.)
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    14 hours ago
















  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "minimum energy path"? Assuming that your data represents the potential energy of the molecule, every path between two given states requires the same amount of enery. It's called the law of conservation of energy.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    20 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Okay, after skimming a bit through the literature, "minimum energy path" seems to be a common notion in chemistry. But the sources I found (e.g., arxiv.org/abs/1802.05669, math.uni-leipzig.de/~quapp/wqTCA84.pdf) were very unclear, what exactly is supposed to be minimized... Probably, I will be able to help you after you have exactly specified the optimization problem that you want to have solved.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    18 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    So I think you want the steepest descent path, correct? Assuming the last point is at the bottom of the valley, so to speak.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    15 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenrikSchumacher If you plot the data provided and the two points, you obtain this plot; he wants to find the lowest-energy path on the surface that connects those two points, which in this case would be simply the steepest-descent path between the two.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    15 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MarcoB Yeah, some authors interpret "minimum energy path" as the steepest-descent path. Others do not. So with all this ambiguity, it is in fact hard to help. I'm voting to close the post because of this. (I am going to redraw this vote when OP clarifies.)
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    14 hours ago










3




3




$begingroup$
What do you mean by "minimum energy path"? Assuming that your data represents the potential energy of the molecule, every path between two given states requires the same amount of enery. It's called the law of conservation of energy.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
20 hours ago






$begingroup$
What do you mean by "minimum energy path"? Assuming that your data represents the potential energy of the molecule, every path between two given states requires the same amount of enery. It's called the law of conservation of energy.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
20 hours ago














$begingroup$
Okay, after skimming a bit through the literature, "minimum energy path" seems to be a common notion in chemistry. But the sources I found (e.g., arxiv.org/abs/1802.05669, math.uni-leipzig.de/~quapp/wqTCA84.pdf) were very unclear, what exactly is supposed to be minimized... Probably, I will be able to help you after you have exactly specified the optimization problem that you want to have solved.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
18 hours ago






$begingroup$
Okay, after skimming a bit through the literature, "minimum energy path" seems to be a common notion in chemistry. But the sources I found (e.g., arxiv.org/abs/1802.05669, math.uni-leipzig.de/~quapp/wqTCA84.pdf) were very unclear, what exactly is supposed to be minimized... Probably, I will be able to help you after you have exactly specified the optimization problem that you want to have solved.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
18 hours ago














$begingroup$
So I think you want the steepest descent path, correct? Assuming the last point is at the bottom of the valley, so to speak.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
15 hours ago




$begingroup$
So I think you want the steepest descent path, correct? Assuming the last point is at the bottom of the valley, so to speak.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
15 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@HenrikSchumacher If you plot the data provided and the two points, you obtain this plot; he wants to find the lowest-energy path on the surface that connects those two points, which in this case would be simply the steepest-descent path between the two.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
15 hours ago




$begingroup$
@HenrikSchumacher If you plot the data provided and the two points, you obtain this plot; he wants to find the lowest-energy path on the surface that connects those two points, which in this case would be simply the steepest-descent path between the two.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
15 hours ago












$begingroup$
@MarcoB Yeah, some authors interpret "minimum energy path" as the steepest-descent path. Others do not. So with all this ambiguity, it is in fact hard to help. I'm voting to close the post because of this. (I am going to redraw this vote when OP clarifies.)
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
14 hours ago






$begingroup$
@MarcoB Yeah, some authors interpret "minimum energy path" as the steepest-descent path. Others do not. So with all this ambiguity, it is in fact hard to help. I'm voting to close the post because of this. (I am going to redraw this vote when OP clarifies.)
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
14 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

Smooth Equations



Let $varphi colon mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R}$ denote a potential function (e.g., from OP's data file).



We attempt to solve the system
$$
left{
begin{aligned}
gamma(0) &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(t)} &= lambda(t) , gamma'(t)quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(1)} &= 0,\
|gamma'(t)| & = mu quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
mu &= mathcal{L}(gamma).
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Here $gamma colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}^d$ is the curve that we are looking for, $p in mathbb{R}^d$ is the starting point, $mathcal{L}(gamma)$ denotes arc length of the curve, and $mu in mathbb{R}$ and $lambda colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}$ are dummy variables. For the interested reader who wonders why the last two equations are not joined to the single equation $|gamma'(t)| = mathcal{L}(gamma)$: This is done in order to enforce that the linearization of the discretized system (see below) is a sparse matrix. Moreover, these two equations are added for stability and in order to have as many degrees of freedom as equations in the discretized setting.



Discretized equations



Next, we discretize the system. We replace the curve $gamma$ by a polygonal line with $n$ edges and vertex coordinates given by $x_1,x_2,dotsc,x_{n+1}$ in $mathbb{R}^d$ and the function $lambda$ by a sequence $lambda_1,dotsc,lambda_n$ (one may think of this as function that is piecewise constant on edges). Replacing derivatives $gamma'(t)$ by finite differences $frac{x_{i+1}-x_i}{n}$ and by evaluating $operatorname{grad}(varphi)$ on the first $n-1$ edge midpoints, we arrive at the discretized system



$$
left{
begin{aligned}
x_1 &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{(x_i+x_{i+1})/2} &= lambda_i , tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n}quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{x_{n+1}} &= 0,\
left| tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n} right| & = mu quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
mu &= sum_{i=1}^{n} left|x_{i+1}-x_{i}right|.
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Implementation



These are routines for the system and its linearization. While ϕ denotes the potential, and DDϕ denote its first and second derivative, respectively. n is the number of edges and d is the dimension of the Euclidean space at hand.



The code is already optized for performance (direct initialization of SparseArray from CRS data), so hard to read. Sorry.



ClearAll[F, DF];
F[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, midpts, speeds},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
speeds = Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
Join[
x[[1]] - p,
Flatten[Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts] - λ Most[tangents]],
Dϕ @@ x[[-1]],
Most[speeds] - μ,
{μ - Total[speeds]/n}
]
];

DF[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, unittangents, midpts, id, A1x, A2x, A3x, A4x, A5x, buffer, A2λ, A, A4μ, A5μ},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
unittangents = tangents/Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
id = IdentityMatrix[d, WorkingPrecision -> MachinePrecision];
A1x = SparseArray[Transpose[{Range[d], Range[d]}] -> 1., {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
buffer = 0.5 DDϕ @@@ Most[midpts];
A2x = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d d (n - 1), 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Partition[Range[d n], 2 d, d], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten@Join[
buffer - λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
buffer + λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
3
]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A3x = SparseArray[Flatten[Table[{i, n d + j}, {i, 1, d}, {j, 1, d}], 1] -> Flatten[DDϕ @@ x[[-1]]], {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
A = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d n, 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Partition[Range[ d (n + 1)], 2 d, d]], 1],
vals = Flatten[Join[unittangents n, -n unittangents, 2]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {n, d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A4x = Most[A];
A5x = SparseArray[{-Total[A]/n}];
A2λ = With[{
rp = Range[0, d (n - 1)],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Range[n - 1], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten[-Most[tangents]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), n - 1}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}
];
A4μ = SparseArray[ConstantArray[-1., {n - 1, 1}]];
A5μ = SparseArray[{{1.}}];
ArrayFlatten[{
{A1x, 0., 0.},
{A2x, A2λ, 0.},
{A3x, 0., 0.},
{A4x, 0., A4μ},
{A5x, 0., A5μ}
}]
];


Application



Let's load the data and make an interpolation function from it. Because DF assumes that ϕ is twice differentiable, we use spline interpolation of order 5.



data = Developer`ToPackedArray[N@Rest[
Import[FileNameJoin[{NotebookDirectory[], "data-e.txt"}], "Table"]
]];

p = {180.0, 179.99};
q = {124.5, 124.49};

Block[{x, y},
ϕ = Interpolation[data, Method -> "Spline", InterpolationOrder -> 5];
Dϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 1}]];
DDϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]];
];


Now, we create some initial data for the system: The straight line from $p$ to $q$ as initial guess for $x$ and some educated guesses for $lambda$ and $mu$. I also perturb the potential minimizer q a bit, because that seems to help FindRoot.



d = Length[p];
n = 1000;
tlist = Subdivide[0., 1., n];
xinit = KroneckerProduct[(1 - tlist), p] + KroneckerProduct[tlist , q + RandomReal[{-1, 1}, d]];

p1 = Most[xinit];
p2 = Rest[xinit];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);

λinit = Norm /@ (Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts])/(Norm /@ Most[tangents]);
μinit = Norm[p - q];
X0 = Join[Flatten[xinit], λinit, {μinit}];


Throwing FindRoot onto it:



sol = FindRoot[F[X] == 0. F[X0], {X, X0}, Jacobian -> DF[X]]; // AbsoluteTiming //First
Xsol = (X /. sol);
Max[Abs[F[Xsol]]]



0.120724



6.15813*10^-10




Partitioning the solution and plotting the result:



xsol = Partition[Xsol[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λsol = Xsol[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μsol = Xsol[[-1]];
curve = Join[xsol, Partition[ϕ @@@ xsol, 1], 2];

{x0, x1} = MinMax[data[[All, 1]]];
{y0, y1} = MinMax[data[[All, 2]]];

Show[
Graphics3D[{Thick, Line[curve]}],
Plot3D[ϕ[x, y], {x, x0, x1}, {y, y0, y1}]
]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is great. I can see many, many applications for something like this. Once the paclet server is out WRI should take these functions and paclet them up to put on there...
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    9 hours ago





















10












$begingroup$

Interesting problem. Decided to treat it as a graph problem, rather than fitting an InterpolatingFunction to it and getting descent directions from there. If I knew the graph packages better, I'd do it differently. But this works...



Bring in the data, dropping the header, and plot the grid along with the two points. Note I converted it to a CSV file in Excel first.



data = Import["C:\data-e.csv"] // Rest
ListPointPlot3D[{data, {{180.0, 179.99, 21.132}, {124.5, 124.49, 0}}},
PlotStyle -> {Red, {PointSize[Large], Blue}}
]


enter image description here



Partition your data so it is 181 x 201 points on a grid.



datpar = Partition[data, 201];
Dimensions[datpar]
(* {181, 201, 3} *)


Put it on a regularized grid, to simplify a few things. Now the first two elements of each point will also be its coordinates.



datNorm = Table[{x, y, datpar[[x, y, 3]]}, {x, 181}, {y, 201}];


Here's a messy function that looks at the 9 points in vicinity (includes itself) and finds the lowest value of them (best point). Then it returns that coordinate of that best point. Some checks in there to keep the search with the boundaries. (Cleaned this up in an edit).



bn[{a1_, a2_}] := Most@First@SortBy[
Flatten[
datNorm[[Max[1,a1-1];;Min[181,a1+1], Max[1,a2-1];;Min[201,a2+1]]],
1],
Last]


Now just let it loose from a start point and run it as a fixed point until it stops changing. This will be the steepest descent path to a minimum.



path = FixedPointList[bn[#] &, {1, 201}, 200];


Get back to the orginal problem space



trajectory = datpar[[First@#, Last@#]] & /@ path


Take a look



ListPointPlot3D[{data, trajectory},
PlotStyle -> {Blue, {PointSize[Large], Red}}
]


enter image description here



Using Interpolation, we can look at the streamline...



interp = Interpolation@({{#[[1]], #[[2]]}, #[[3]]} & /@ data)

StreamPlot[
Evaluate[-D[interp[x, y], {{x, y}}]], {x, 90, 180}, {y, 79.99, 179.99},
StreamStyle -> "Segment",
StreamPoints -> {{{{179, 179.9}, Red}, Automatic}},
GridLines -> {Table[i, {i, 90, 180, 1}], Table[i, {i, 80, 180, 1}]},
Mesh -> 50]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could also use your regularized grid with NDSolve`FiniteDifferenceDerivative to get the gradient at each point and just track that. It'd be more numerically efficient I think since this problem really can't get trapped in a spurious minimum (based on the plot)
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another option if you want to go the Graph route is create a weighted GridGraph where the EdgeWeights are the squared differences in PE between points. Then you can use FindShortestPath.
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I fiddled with a GridGraph a little. I was thinking that I could assign the point values to VertexWeight or EdgeWeightand then have it find a shortest/least costly path, but got bogged down in the details of posing the problem. Would love to see a solution based on that.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    11 hours ago





















4












$begingroup$

If I understand the problem correctly, we just need to extract the path from StreamPlot, don't we?



If you have difficulty in accessing the data in dropbox in the question, try the following:



Import["http://halirutan.github.io/Mathematica-SE-Tools/decode.m"]["http://i.stack.imgur.
com/eDzXT.png"]
SelectionMove[EvaluationNotebook[], Previous, Cell, 1];
dat = Uncompress@First@First@NotebookRead@EvaluationNotebook[];
NotebookDelete@EvaluationNotebook[];

func = Interpolation@dat;

{vx, vy} = Function[{x, y}, #] & /@ Grad[func[x, y], {x, y}];

begin = {180.0, 179.99};
end = {124.5, 124.49};

plot = StreamPlot[{vx[x, y], vy[x, y]}, {x, #, #2}, {y, #3, #4}, StreamPoints -> {begin},
StreamStyle -> "Line", Epilog -> Point@{begin, end}] & @@ Flatten@func["Domain"]


Mathematica graphics



path = Cases[Normal@plot, Line[a_] :> a, Infinity][[1]];

ListPlot3D@dat~Show~Graphics3D@Line[Flatten /@ ({path, func @@@ path}[Transpose])]


Mathematica graphics






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Whaow that's a simple solution :)
    $endgroup$
    – chris
    18 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191925%2fminimum-energy-path-of-a-potential-energy-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11












$begingroup$

Smooth Equations



Let $varphi colon mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R}$ denote a potential function (e.g., from OP's data file).



We attempt to solve the system
$$
left{
begin{aligned}
gamma(0) &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(t)} &= lambda(t) , gamma'(t)quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(1)} &= 0,\
|gamma'(t)| & = mu quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
mu &= mathcal{L}(gamma).
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Here $gamma colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}^d$ is the curve that we are looking for, $p in mathbb{R}^d$ is the starting point, $mathcal{L}(gamma)$ denotes arc length of the curve, and $mu in mathbb{R}$ and $lambda colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}$ are dummy variables. For the interested reader who wonders why the last two equations are not joined to the single equation $|gamma'(t)| = mathcal{L}(gamma)$: This is done in order to enforce that the linearization of the discretized system (see below) is a sparse matrix. Moreover, these two equations are added for stability and in order to have as many degrees of freedom as equations in the discretized setting.



Discretized equations



Next, we discretize the system. We replace the curve $gamma$ by a polygonal line with $n$ edges and vertex coordinates given by $x_1,x_2,dotsc,x_{n+1}$ in $mathbb{R}^d$ and the function $lambda$ by a sequence $lambda_1,dotsc,lambda_n$ (one may think of this as function that is piecewise constant on edges). Replacing derivatives $gamma'(t)$ by finite differences $frac{x_{i+1}-x_i}{n}$ and by evaluating $operatorname{grad}(varphi)$ on the first $n-1$ edge midpoints, we arrive at the discretized system



$$
left{
begin{aligned}
x_1 &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{(x_i+x_{i+1})/2} &= lambda_i , tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n}quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{x_{n+1}} &= 0,\
left| tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n} right| & = mu quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
mu &= sum_{i=1}^{n} left|x_{i+1}-x_{i}right|.
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Implementation



These are routines for the system and its linearization. While ϕ denotes the potential, and DDϕ denote its first and second derivative, respectively. n is the number of edges and d is the dimension of the Euclidean space at hand.



The code is already optized for performance (direct initialization of SparseArray from CRS data), so hard to read. Sorry.



ClearAll[F, DF];
F[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, midpts, speeds},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
speeds = Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
Join[
x[[1]] - p,
Flatten[Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts] - λ Most[tangents]],
Dϕ @@ x[[-1]],
Most[speeds] - μ,
{μ - Total[speeds]/n}
]
];

DF[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, unittangents, midpts, id, A1x, A2x, A3x, A4x, A5x, buffer, A2λ, A, A4μ, A5μ},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
unittangents = tangents/Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
id = IdentityMatrix[d, WorkingPrecision -> MachinePrecision];
A1x = SparseArray[Transpose[{Range[d], Range[d]}] -> 1., {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
buffer = 0.5 DDϕ @@@ Most[midpts];
A2x = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d d (n - 1), 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Partition[Range[d n], 2 d, d], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten@Join[
buffer - λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
buffer + λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
3
]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A3x = SparseArray[Flatten[Table[{i, n d + j}, {i, 1, d}, {j, 1, d}], 1] -> Flatten[DDϕ @@ x[[-1]]], {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
A = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d n, 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Partition[Range[ d (n + 1)], 2 d, d]], 1],
vals = Flatten[Join[unittangents n, -n unittangents, 2]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {n, d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A4x = Most[A];
A5x = SparseArray[{-Total[A]/n}];
A2λ = With[{
rp = Range[0, d (n - 1)],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Range[n - 1], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten[-Most[tangents]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), n - 1}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}
];
A4μ = SparseArray[ConstantArray[-1., {n - 1, 1}]];
A5μ = SparseArray[{{1.}}];
ArrayFlatten[{
{A1x, 0., 0.},
{A2x, A2λ, 0.},
{A3x, 0., 0.},
{A4x, 0., A4μ},
{A5x, 0., A5μ}
}]
];


Application



Let's load the data and make an interpolation function from it. Because DF assumes that ϕ is twice differentiable, we use spline interpolation of order 5.



data = Developer`ToPackedArray[N@Rest[
Import[FileNameJoin[{NotebookDirectory[], "data-e.txt"}], "Table"]
]];

p = {180.0, 179.99};
q = {124.5, 124.49};

Block[{x, y},
ϕ = Interpolation[data, Method -> "Spline", InterpolationOrder -> 5];
Dϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 1}]];
DDϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]];
];


Now, we create some initial data for the system: The straight line from $p$ to $q$ as initial guess for $x$ and some educated guesses for $lambda$ and $mu$. I also perturb the potential minimizer q a bit, because that seems to help FindRoot.



d = Length[p];
n = 1000;
tlist = Subdivide[0., 1., n];
xinit = KroneckerProduct[(1 - tlist), p] + KroneckerProduct[tlist , q + RandomReal[{-1, 1}, d]];

p1 = Most[xinit];
p2 = Rest[xinit];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);

λinit = Norm /@ (Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts])/(Norm /@ Most[tangents]);
μinit = Norm[p - q];
X0 = Join[Flatten[xinit], λinit, {μinit}];


Throwing FindRoot onto it:



sol = FindRoot[F[X] == 0. F[X0], {X, X0}, Jacobian -> DF[X]]; // AbsoluteTiming //First
Xsol = (X /. sol);
Max[Abs[F[Xsol]]]



0.120724



6.15813*10^-10




Partitioning the solution and plotting the result:



xsol = Partition[Xsol[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λsol = Xsol[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μsol = Xsol[[-1]];
curve = Join[xsol, Partition[ϕ @@@ xsol, 1], 2];

{x0, x1} = MinMax[data[[All, 1]]];
{y0, y1} = MinMax[data[[All, 2]]];

Show[
Graphics3D[{Thick, Line[curve]}],
Plot3D[ϕ[x, y], {x, x0, x1}, {y, y0, y1}]
]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is great. I can see many, many applications for something like this. Once the paclet server is out WRI should take these functions and paclet them up to put on there...
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    9 hours ago


















11












$begingroup$

Smooth Equations



Let $varphi colon mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R}$ denote a potential function (e.g., from OP's data file).



We attempt to solve the system
$$
left{
begin{aligned}
gamma(0) &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(t)} &= lambda(t) , gamma'(t)quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(1)} &= 0,\
|gamma'(t)| & = mu quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
mu &= mathcal{L}(gamma).
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Here $gamma colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}^d$ is the curve that we are looking for, $p in mathbb{R}^d$ is the starting point, $mathcal{L}(gamma)$ denotes arc length of the curve, and $mu in mathbb{R}$ and $lambda colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}$ are dummy variables. For the interested reader who wonders why the last two equations are not joined to the single equation $|gamma'(t)| = mathcal{L}(gamma)$: This is done in order to enforce that the linearization of the discretized system (see below) is a sparse matrix. Moreover, these two equations are added for stability and in order to have as many degrees of freedom as equations in the discretized setting.



Discretized equations



Next, we discretize the system. We replace the curve $gamma$ by a polygonal line with $n$ edges and vertex coordinates given by $x_1,x_2,dotsc,x_{n+1}$ in $mathbb{R}^d$ and the function $lambda$ by a sequence $lambda_1,dotsc,lambda_n$ (one may think of this as function that is piecewise constant on edges). Replacing derivatives $gamma'(t)$ by finite differences $frac{x_{i+1}-x_i}{n}$ and by evaluating $operatorname{grad}(varphi)$ on the first $n-1$ edge midpoints, we arrive at the discretized system



$$
left{
begin{aligned}
x_1 &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{(x_i+x_{i+1})/2} &= lambda_i , tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n}quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{x_{n+1}} &= 0,\
left| tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n} right| & = mu quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
mu &= sum_{i=1}^{n} left|x_{i+1}-x_{i}right|.
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Implementation



These are routines for the system and its linearization. While ϕ denotes the potential, and DDϕ denote its first and second derivative, respectively. n is the number of edges and d is the dimension of the Euclidean space at hand.



The code is already optized for performance (direct initialization of SparseArray from CRS data), so hard to read. Sorry.



ClearAll[F, DF];
F[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, midpts, speeds},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
speeds = Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
Join[
x[[1]] - p,
Flatten[Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts] - λ Most[tangents]],
Dϕ @@ x[[-1]],
Most[speeds] - μ,
{μ - Total[speeds]/n}
]
];

DF[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, unittangents, midpts, id, A1x, A2x, A3x, A4x, A5x, buffer, A2λ, A, A4μ, A5μ},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
unittangents = tangents/Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
id = IdentityMatrix[d, WorkingPrecision -> MachinePrecision];
A1x = SparseArray[Transpose[{Range[d], Range[d]}] -> 1., {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
buffer = 0.5 DDϕ @@@ Most[midpts];
A2x = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d d (n - 1), 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Partition[Range[d n], 2 d, d], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten@Join[
buffer - λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
buffer + λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
3
]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A3x = SparseArray[Flatten[Table[{i, n d + j}, {i, 1, d}, {j, 1, d}], 1] -> Flatten[DDϕ @@ x[[-1]]], {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
A = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d n, 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Partition[Range[ d (n + 1)], 2 d, d]], 1],
vals = Flatten[Join[unittangents n, -n unittangents, 2]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {n, d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A4x = Most[A];
A5x = SparseArray[{-Total[A]/n}];
A2λ = With[{
rp = Range[0, d (n - 1)],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Range[n - 1], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten[-Most[tangents]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), n - 1}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}
];
A4μ = SparseArray[ConstantArray[-1., {n - 1, 1}]];
A5μ = SparseArray[{{1.}}];
ArrayFlatten[{
{A1x, 0., 0.},
{A2x, A2λ, 0.},
{A3x, 0., 0.},
{A4x, 0., A4μ},
{A5x, 0., A5μ}
}]
];


Application



Let's load the data and make an interpolation function from it. Because DF assumes that ϕ is twice differentiable, we use spline interpolation of order 5.



data = Developer`ToPackedArray[N@Rest[
Import[FileNameJoin[{NotebookDirectory[], "data-e.txt"}], "Table"]
]];

p = {180.0, 179.99};
q = {124.5, 124.49};

Block[{x, y},
ϕ = Interpolation[data, Method -> "Spline", InterpolationOrder -> 5];
Dϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 1}]];
DDϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]];
];


Now, we create some initial data for the system: The straight line from $p$ to $q$ as initial guess for $x$ and some educated guesses for $lambda$ and $mu$. I also perturb the potential minimizer q a bit, because that seems to help FindRoot.



d = Length[p];
n = 1000;
tlist = Subdivide[0., 1., n];
xinit = KroneckerProduct[(1 - tlist), p] + KroneckerProduct[tlist , q + RandomReal[{-1, 1}, d]];

p1 = Most[xinit];
p2 = Rest[xinit];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);

λinit = Norm /@ (Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts])/(Norm /@ Most[tangents]);
μinit = Norm[p - q];
X0 = Join[Flatten[xinit], λinit, {μinit}];


Throwing FindRoot onto it:



sol = FindRoot[F[X] == 0. F[X0], {X, X0}, Jacobian -> DF[X]]; // AbsoluteTiming //First
Xsol = (X /. sol);
Max[Abs[F[Xsol]]]



0.120724



6.15813*10^-10




Partitioning the solution and plotting the result:



xsol = Partition[Xsol[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λsol = Xsol[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μsol = Xsol[[-1]];
curve = Join[xsol, Partition[ϕ @@@ xsol, 1], 2];

{x0, x1} = MinMax[data[[All, 1]]];
{y0, y1} = MinMax[data[[All, 2]]];

Show[
Graphics3D[{Thick, Line[curve]}],
Plot3D[ϕ[x, y], {x, x0, x1}, {y, y0, y1}]
]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is great. I can see many, many applications for something like this. Once the paclet server is out WRI should take these functions and paclet them up to put on there...
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    9 hours ago
















11












11








11





$begingroup$

Smooth Equations



Let $varphi colon mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R}$ denote a potential function (e.g., from OP's data file).



We attempt to solve the system
$$
left{
begin{aligned}
gamma(0) &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(t)} &= lambda(t) , gamma'(t)quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(1)} &= 0,\
|gamma'(t)| & = mu quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
mu &= mathcal{L}(gamma).
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Here $gamma colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}^d$ is the curve that we are looking for, $p in mathbb{R}^d$ is the starting point, $mathcal{L}(gamma)$ denotes arc length of the curve, and $mu in mathbb{R}$ and $lambda colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}$ are dummy variables. For the interested reader who wonders why the last two equations are not joined to the single equation $|gamma'(t)| = mathcal{L}(gamma)$: This is done in order to enforce that the linearization of the discretized system (see below) is a sparse matrix. Moreover, these two equations are added for stability and in order to have as many degrees of freedom as equations in the discretized setting.



Discretized equations



Next, we discretize the system. We replace the curve $gamma$ by a polygonal line with $n$ edges and vertex coordinates given by $x_1,x_2,dotsc,x_{n+1}$ in $mathbb{R}^d$ and the function $lambda$ by a sequence $lambda_1,dotsc,lambda_n$ (one may think of this as function that is piecewise constant on edges). Replacing derivatives $gamma'(t)$ by finite differences $frac{x_{i+1}-x_i}{n}$ and by evaluating $operatorname{grad}(varphi)$ on the first $n-1$ edge midpoints, we arrive at the discretized system



$$
left{
begin{aligned}
x_1 &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{(x_i+x_{i+1})/2} &= lambda_i , tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n}quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{x_{n+1}} &= 0,\
left| tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n} right| & = mu quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
mu &= sum_{i=1}^{n} left|x_{i+1}-x_{i}right|.
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Implementation



These are routines for the system and its linearization. While ϕ denotes the potential, and DDϕ denote its first and second derivative, respectively. n is the number of edges and d is the dimension of the Euclidean space at hand.



The code is already optized for performance (direct initialization of SparseArray from CRS data), so hard to read. Sorry.



ClearAll[F, DF];
F[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, midpts, speeds},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
speeds = Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
Join[
x[[1]] - p,
Flatten[Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts] - λ Most[tangents]],
Dϕ @@ x[[-1]],
Most[speeds] - μ,
{μ - Total[speeds]/n}
]
];

DF[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, unittangents, midpts, id, A1x, A2x, A3x, A4x, A5x, buffer, A2λ, A, A4μ, A5μ},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
unittangents = tangents/Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
id = IdentityMatrix[d, WorkingPrecision -> MachinePrecision];
A1x = SparseArray[Transpose[{Range[d], Range[d]}] -> 1., {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
buffer = 0.5 DDϕ @@@ Most[midpts];
A2x = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d d (n - 1), 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Partition[Range[d n], 2 d, d], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten@Join[
buffer - λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
buffer + λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
3
]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A3x = SparseArray[Flatten[Table[{i, n d + j}, {i, 1, d}, {j, 1, d}], 1] -> Flatten[DDϕ @@ x[[-1]]], {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
A = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d n, 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Partition[Range[ d (n + 1)], 2 d, d]], 1],
vals = Flatten[Join[unittangents n, -n unittangents, 2]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {n, d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A4x = Most[A];
A5x = SparseArray[{-Total[A]/n}];
A2λ = With[{
rp = Range[0, d (n - 1)],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Range[n - 1], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten[-Most[tangents]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), n - 1}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}
];
A4μ = SparseArray[ConstantArray[-1., {n - 1, 1}]];
A5μ = SparseArray[{{1.}}];
ArrayFlatten[{
{A1x, 0., 0.},
{A2x, A2λ, 0.},
{A3x, 0., 0.},
{A4x, 0., A4μ},
{A5x, 0., A5μ}
}]
];


Application



Let's load the data and make an interpolation function from it. Because DF assumes that ϕ is twice differentiable, we use spline interpolation of order 5.



data = Developer`ToPackedArray[N@Rest[
Import[FileNameJoin[{NotebookDirectory[], "data-e.txt"}], "Table"]
]];

p = {180.0, 179.99};
q = {124.5, 124.49};

Block[{x, y},
ϕ = Interpolation[data, Method -> "Spline", InterpolationOrder -> 5];
Dϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 1}]];
DDϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]];
];


Now, we create some initial data for the system: The straight line from $p$ to $q$ as initial guess for $x$ and some educated guesses for $lambda$ and $mu$. I also perturb the potential minimizer q a bit, because that seems to help FindRoot.



d = Length[p];
n = 1000;
tlist = Subdivide[0., 1., n];
xinit = KroneckerProduct[(1 - tlist), p] + KroneckerProduct[tlist , q + RandomReal[{-1, 1}, d]];

p1 = Most[xinit];
p2 = Rest[xinit];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);

λinit = Norm /@ (Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts])/(Norm /@ Most[tangents]);
μinit = Norm[p - q];
X0 = Join[Flatten[xinit], λinit, {μinit}];


Throwing FindRoot onto it:



sol = FindRoot[F[X] == 0. F[X0], {X, X0}, Jacobian -> DF[X]]; // AbsoluteTiming //First
Xsol = (X /. sol);
Max[Abs[F[Xsol]]]



0.120724



6.15813*10^-10




Partitioning the solution and plotting the result:



xsol = Partition[Xsol[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λsol = Xsol[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μsol = Xsol[[-1]];
curve = Join[xsol, Partition[ϕ @@@ xsol, 1], 2];

{x0, x1} = MinMax[data[[All, 1]]];
{y0, y1} = MinMax[data[[All, 2]]];

Show[
Graphics3D[{Thick, Line[curve]}],
Plot3D[ϕ[x, y], {x, x0, x1}, {y, y0, y1}]
]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Smooth Equations



Let $varphi colon mathbb{R}^d to mathbb{R}$ denote a potential function (e.g., from OP's data file).



We attempt to solve the system
$$
left{
begin{aligned}
gamma(0) &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(t)} &= lambda(t) , gamma'(t)quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{gamma(1)} &= 0,\
|gamma'(t)| & = mu quad text{for all $t in [0,1]$,}\
mu &= mathcal{L}(gamma).
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Here $gamma colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}^d$ is the curve that we are looking for, $p in mathbb{R}^d$ is the starting point, $mathcal{L}(gamma)$ denotes arc length of the curve, and $mu in mathbb{R}$ and $lambda colon [0,1] to mathbb{R}$ are dummy variables. For the interested reader who wonders why the last two equations are not joined to the single equation $|gamma'(t)| = mathcal{L}(gamma)$: This is done in order to enforce that the linearization of the discretized system (see below) is a sparse matrix. Moreover, these two equations are added for stability and in order to have as many degrees of freedom as equations in the discretized setting.



Discretized equations



Next, we discretize the system. We replace the curve $gamma$ by a polygonal line with $n$ edges and vertex coordinates given by $x_1,x_2,dotsc,x_{n+1}$ in $mathbb{R}^d$ and the function $lambda$ by a sequence $lambda_1,dotsc,lambda_n$ (one may think of this as function that is piecewise constant on edges). Replacing derivatives $gamma'(t)$ by finite differences $frac{x_{i+1}-x_i}{n}$ and by evaluating $operatorname{grad}(varphi)$ on the first $n-1$ edge midpoints, we arrive at the discretized system



$$
left{
begin{aligned}
x_1 &= p,\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{(x_i+x_{i+1})/2} &= lambda_i , tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n}quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
operatorname{grad}(varphi)|_{x_{n+1}} &= 0,\
left| tfrac{x_{i+1}-x_{i}}{n} right| & = mu quad text{for all $i in {1,dotsc,n-1}$,}\
mu &= sum_{i=1}^{n} left|x_{i+1}-x_{i}right|.
end{aligned}
right.
$$



Implementation



These are routines for the system and its linearization. While ϕ denotes the potential, and DDϕ denote its first and second derivative, respectively. n is the number of edges and d is the dimension of the Euclidean space at hand.



The code is already optized for performance (direct initialization of SparseArray from CRS data), so hard to read. Sorry.



ClearAll[F, DF];
F[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, midpts, speeds},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
speeds = Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
Join[
x[[1]] - p,
Flatten[Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts] - λ Most[tangents]],
Dϕ @@ x[[-1]],
Most[speeds] - μ,
{μ - Total[speeds]/n}
]
];

DF[X_?VectorQ] :=
Module[{x, λ, μ, p1, p2, tangents, unittangents, midpts, id, A1x, A2x, A3x, A4x, A5x, buffer, A2λ, A, A4μ, A5μ},
x = Partition[X[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λ = X[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μ = X[[-1]];
p1 = Most[x];
p2 = Rest[x];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
unittangents = tangents/Sqrt[(tangents^2).ConstantArray[1., d]];
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);
id = IdentityMatrix[d, WorkingPrecision -> MachinePrecision];
A1x = SparseArray[Transpose[{Range[d], Range[d]}] -> 1., {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
buffer = 0.5 DDϕ @@@ Most[midpts];
A2x = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d d (n - 1), 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Partition[Range[d n], 2 d, d], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten@Join[
buffer - λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
buffer + λ ConstantArray[id n, n - 1],
3
]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A3x = SparseArray[Flatten[Table[{i, n d + j}, {i, 1, d}, {j, 1, d}], 1] -> Flatten[DDϕ @@ x[[-1]]], {d, d (n + 1)}, 0.];
A = With[{
rp = Range[0, 2 d n, 2 d],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Partition[Range[ d (n + 1)], 2 d, d]], 1],
vals = Flatten[Join[unittangents n, -n unittangents, 2]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {n, d (n + 1)}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}];
A4x = Most[A];
A5x = SparseArray[{-Total[A]/n}];
A2λ = With[{
rp = Range[0, d (n - 1)],
ci = Partition[Flatten[Transpose[ConstantArray[Range[n - 1], d]]], 1],
vals = Flatten[-Most[tangents]]
},
SparseArray @@ {Automatic, {d (n - 1), n - 1}, 0., {1, {rp, ci}, vals}}
];
A4μ = SparseArray[ConstantArray[-1., {n - 1, 1}]];
A5μ = SparseArray[{{1.}}];
ArrayFlatten[{
{A1x, 0., 0.},
{A2x, A2λ, 0.},
{A3x, 0., 0.},
{A4x, 0., A4μ},
{A5x, 0., A5μ}
}]
];


Application



Let's load the data and make an interpolation function from it. Because DF assumes that ϕ is twice differentiable, we use spline interpolation of order 5.



data = Developer`ToPackedArray[N@Rest[
Import[FileNameJoin[{NotebookDirectory[], "data-e.txt"}], "Table"]
]];

p = {180.0, 179.99};
q = {124.5, 124.49};

Block[{x, y},
ϕ = Interpolation[data, Method -> "Spline", InterpolationOrder -> 5];
Dϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 1}]];
DDϕ = {x, y} [Function] Evaluate[D[ϕ[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]];
];


Now, we create some initial data for the system: The straight line from $p$ to $q$ as initial guess for $x$ and some educated guesses for $lambda$ and $mu$. I also perturb the potential minimizer q a bit, because that seems to help FindRoot.



d = Length[p];
n = 1000;
tlist = Subdivide[0., 1., n];
xinit = KroneckerProduct[(1 - tlist), p] + KroneckerProduct[tlist , q + RandomReal[{-1, 1}, d]];

p1 = Most[xinit];
p2 = Rest[xinit];
tangents = (p1 - p2) n;
midpts = 0.5 (p1 + p2);

λinit = Norm /@ (Dϕ @@@ Most[midpts])/(Norm /@ Most[tangents]);
μinit = Norm[p - q];
X0 = Join[Flatten[xinit], λinit, {μinit}];


Throwing FindRoot onto it:



sol = FindRoot[F[X] == 0. F[X0], {X, X0}, Jacobian -> DF[X]]; // AbsoluteTiming //First
Xsol = (X /. sol);
Max[Abs[F[Xsol]]]



0.120724



6.15813*10^-10




Partitioning the solution and plotting the result:



xsol = Partition[Xsol[[1 ;; (n + 1) d]], d];
λsol = Xsol[[(n + 1) d + 1 ;; -2]];
μsol = Xsol[[-1]];
curve = Join[xsol, Partition[ϕ @@@ xsol, 1], 2];

{x0, x1} = MinMax[data[[All, 1]]];
{y0, y1} = MinMax[data[[All, 2]]];

Show[
Graphics3D[{Thick, Line[curve]}],
Plot3D[ϕ[x, y], {x, x0, x1}, {y, y0, y1}]
]


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 10 hours ago

























answered 11 hours ago









Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher

54.2k472150




54.2k472150












  • $begingroup$
    This is great. I can see many, many applications for something like this. Once the paclet server is out WRI should take these functions and paclet them up to put on there...
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    9 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    This is great. I can see many, many applications for something like this. Once the paclet server is out WRI should take these functions and paclet them up to put on there...
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    9 hours ago


















$begingroup$
This is great. I can see many, many applications for something like this. Once the paclet server is out WRI should take these functions and paclet them up to put on there...
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
9 hours ago






$begingroup$
This is great. I can see many, many applications for something like this. Once the paclet server is out WRI should take these functions and paclet them up to put on there...
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
9 hours ago













10












$begingroup$

Interesting problem. Decided to treat it as a graph problem, rather than fitting an InterpolatingFunction to it and getting descent directions from there. If I knew the graph packages better, I'd do it differently. But this works...



Bring in the data, dropping the header, and plot the grid along with the two points. Note I converted it to a CSV file in Excel first.



data = Import["C:\data-e.csv"] // Rest
ListPointPlot3D[{data, {{180.0, 179.99, 21.132}, {124.5, 124.49, 0}}},
PlotStyle -> {Red, {PointSize[Large], Blue}}
]


enter image description here



Partition your data so it is 181 x 201 points on a grid.



datpar = Partition[data, 201];
Dimensions[datpar]
(* {181, 201, 3} *)


Put it on a regularized grid, to simplify a few things. Now the first two elements of each point will also be its coordinates.



datNorm = Table[{x, y, datpar[[x, y, 3]]}, {x, 181}, {y, 201}];


Here's a messy function that looks at the 9 points in vicinity (includes itself) and finds the lowest value of them (best point). Then it returns that coordinate of that best point. Some checks in there to keep the search with the boundaries. (Cleaned this up in an edit).



bn[{a1_, a2_}] := Most@First@SortBy[
Flatten[
datNorm[[Max[1,a1-1];;Min[181,a1+1], Max[1,a2-1];;Min[201,a2+1]]],
1],
Last]


Now just let it loose from a start point and run it as a fixed point until it stops changing. This will be the steepest descent path to a minimum.



path = FixedPointList[bn[#] &, {1, 201}, 200];


Get back to the orginal problem space



trajectory = datpar[[First@#, Last@#]] & /@ path


Take a look



ListPointPlot3D[{data, trajectory},
PlotStyle -> {Blue, {PointSize[Large], Red}}
]


enter image description here



Using Interpolation, we can look at the streamline...



interp = Interpolation@({{#[[1]], #[[2]]}, #[[3]]} & /@ data)

StreamPlot[
Evaluate[-D[interp[x, y], {{x, y}}]], {x, 90, 180}, {y, 79.99, 179.99},
StreamStyle -> "Segment",
StreamPoints -> {{{{179, 179.9}, Red}, Automatic}},
GridLines -> {Table[i, {i, 90, 180, 1}], Table[i, {i, 80, 180, 1}]},
Mesh -> 50]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could also use your regularized grid with NDSolve`FiniteDifferenceDerivative to get the gradient at each point and just track that. It'd be more numerically efficient I think since this problem really can't get trapped in a spurious minimum (based on the plot)
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another option if you want to go the Graph route is create a weighted GridGraph where the EdgeWeights are the squared differences in PE between points. Then you can use FindShortestPath.
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I fiddled with a GridGraph a little. I was thinking that I could assign the point values to VertexWeight or EdgeWeightand then have it find a shortest/least costly path, but got bogged down in the details of posing the problem. Would love to see a solution based on that.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    11 hours ago


















10












$begingroup$

Interesting problem. Decided to treat it as a graph problem, rather than fitting an InterpolatingFunction to it and getting descent directions from there. If I knew the graph packages better, I'd do it differently. But this works...



Bring in the data, dropping the header, and plot the grid along with the two points. Note I converted it to a CSV file in Excel first.



data = Import["C:\data-e.csv"] // Rest
ListPointPlot3D[{data, {{180.0, 179.99, 21.132}, {124.5, 124.49, 0}}},
PlotStyle -> {Red, {PointSize[Large], Blue}}
]


enter image description here



Partition your data so it is 181 x 201 points on a grid.



datpar = Partition[data, 201];
Dimensions[datpar]
(* {181, 201, 3} *)


Put it on a regularized grid, to simplify a few things. Now the first two elements of each point will also be its coordinates.



datNorm = Table[{x, y, datpar[[x, y, 3]]}, {x, 181}, {y, 201}];


Here's a messy function that looks at the 9 points in vicinity (includes itself) and finds the lowest value of them (best point). Then it returns that coordinate of that best point. Some checks in there to keep the search with the boundaries. (Cleaned this up in an edit).



bn[{a1_, a2_}] := Most@First@SortBy[
Flatten[
datNorm[[Max[1,a1-1];;Min[181,a1+1], Max[1,a2-1];;Min[201,a2+1]]],
1],
Last]


Now just let it loose from a start point and run it as a fixed point until it stops changing. This will be the steepest descent path to a minimum.



path = FixedPointList[bn[#] &, {1, 201}, 200];


Get back to the orginal problem space



trajectory = datpar[[First@#, Last@#]] & /@ path


Take a look



ListPointPlot3D[{data, trajectory},
PlotStyle -> {Blue, {PointSize[Large], Red}}
]


enter image description here



Using Interpolation, we can look at the streamline...



interp = Interpolation@({{#[[1]], #[[2]]}, #[[3]]} & /@ data)

StreamPlot[
Evaluate[-D[interp[x, y], {{x, y}}]], {x, 90, 180}, {y, 79.99, 179.99},
StreamStyle -> "Segment",
StreamPoints -> {{{{179, 179.9}, Red}, Automatic}},
GridLines -> {Table[i, {i, 90, 180, 1}], Table[i, {i, 80, 180, 1}]},
Mesh -> 50]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could also use your regularized grid with NDSolve`FiniteDifferenceDerivative to get the gradient at each point and just track that. It'd be more numerically efficient I think since this problem really can't get trapped in a spurious minimum (based on the plot)
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another option if you want to go the Graph route is create a weighted GridGraph where the EdgeWeights are the squared differences in PE between points. Then you can use FindShortestPath.
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I fiddled with a GridGraph a little. I was thinking that I could assign the point values to VertexWeight or EdgeWeightand then have it find a shortest/least costly path, but got bogged down in the details of posing the problem. Would love to see a solution based on that.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    11 hours ago
















10












10








10





$begingroup$

Interesting problem. Decided to treat it as a graph problem, rather than fitting an InterpolatingFunction to it and getting descent directions from there. If I knew the graph packages better, I'd do it differently. But this works...



Bring in the data, dropping the header, and plot the grid along with the two points. Note I converted it to a CSV file in Excel first.



data = Import["C:\data-e.csv"] // Rest
ListPointPlot3D[{data, {{180.0, 179.99, 21.132}, {124.5, 124.49, 0}}},
PlotStyle -> {Red, {PointSize[Large], Blue}}
]


enter image description here



Partition your data so it is 181 x 201 points on a grid.



datpar = Partition[data, 201];
Dimensions[datpar]
(* {181, 201, 3} *)


Put it on a regularized grid, to simplify a few things. Now the first two elements of each point will also be its coordinates.



datNorm = Table[{x, y, datpar[[x, y, 3]]}, {x, 181}, {y, 201}];


Here's a messy function that looks at the 9 points in vicinity (includes itself) and finds the lowest value of them (best point). Then it returns that coordinate of that best point. Some checks in there to keep the search with the boundaries. (Cleaned this up in an edit).



bn[{a1_, a2_}] := Most@First@SortBy[
Flatten[
datNorm[[Max[1,a1-1];;Min[181,a1+1], Max[1,a2-1];;Min[201,a2+1]]],
1],
Last]


Now just let it loose from a start point and run it as a fixed point until it stops changing. This will be the steepest descent path to a minimum.



path = FixedPointList[bn[#] &, {1, 201}, 200];


Get back to the orginal problem space



trajectory = datpar[[First@#, Last@#]] & /@ path


Take a look



ListPointPlot3D[{data, trajectory},
PlotStyle -> {Blue, {PointSize[Large], Red}}
]


enter image description here



Using Interpolation, we can look at the streamline...



interp = Interpolation@({{#[[1]], #[[2]]}, #[[3]]} & /@ data)

StreamPlot[
Evaluate[-D[interp[x, y], {{x, y}}]], {x, 90, 180}, {y, 79.99, 179.99},
StreamStyle -> "Segment",
StreamPoints -> {{{{179, 179.9}, Red}, Automatic}},
GridLines -> {Table[i, {i, 90, 180, 1}], Table[i, {i, 80, 180, 1}]},
Mesh -> 50]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Interesting problem. Decided to treat it as a graph problem, rather than fitting an InterpolatingFunction to it and getting descent directions from there. If I knew the graph packages better, I'd do it differently. But this works...



Bring in the data, dropping the header, and plot the grid along with the two points. Note I converted it to a CSV file in Excel first.



data = Import["C:\data-e.csv"] // Rest
ListPointPlot3D[{data, {{180.0, 179.99, 21.132}, {124.5, 124.49, 0}}},
PlotStyle -> {Red, {PointSize[Large], Blue}}
]


enter image description here



Partition your data so it is 181 x 201 points on a grid.



datpar = Partition[data, 201];
Dimensions[datpar]
(* {181, 201, 3} *)


Put it on a regularized grid, to simplify a few things. Now the first two elements of each point will also be its coordinates.



datNorm = Table[{x, y, datpar[[x, y, 3]]}, {x, 181}, {y, 201}];


Here's a messy function that looks at the 9 points in vicinity (includes itself) and finds the lowest value of them (best point). Then it returns that coordinate of that best point. Some checks in there to keep the search with the boundaries. (Cleaned this up in an edit).



bn[{a1_, a2_}] := Most@First@SortBy[
Flatten[
datNorm[[Max[1,a1-1];;Min[181,a1+1], Max[1,a2-1];;Min[201,a2+1]]],
1],
Last]


Now just let it loose from a start point and run it as a fixed point until it stops changing. This will be the steepest descent path to a minimum.



path = FixedPointList[bn[#] &, {1, 201}, 200];


Get back to the orginal problem space



trajectory = datpar[[First@#, Last@#]] & /@ path


Take a look



ListPointPlot3D[{data, trajectory},
PlotStyle -> {Blue, {PointSize[Large], Red}}
]


enter image description here



Using Interpolation, we can look at the streamline...



interp = Interpolation@({{#[[1]], #[[2]]}, #[[3]]} & /@ data)

StreamPlot[
Evaluate[-D[interp[x, y], {{x, y}}]], {x, 90, 180}, {y, 79.99, 179.99},
StreamStyle -> "Segment",
StreamPoints -> {{{{179, 179.9}, Red}, Automatic}},
GridLines -> {Table[i, {i, 90, 180, 1}], Table[i, {i, 80, 180, 1}]},
Mesh -> 50]


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 9 hours ago

























answered 13 hours ago









MikeYMikeY

2,927413




2,927413








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could also use your regularized grid with NDSolve`FiniteDifferenceDerivative to get the gradient at each point and just track that. It'd be more numerically efficient I think since this problem really can't get trapped in a spurious minimum (based on the plot)
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another option if you want to go the Graph route is create a weighted GridGraph where the EdgeWeights are the squared differences in PE between points. Then you can use FindShortestPath.
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I fiddled with a GridGraph a little. I was thinking that I could assign the point values to VertexWeight or EdgeWeightand then have it find a shortest/least costly path, but got bogged down in the details of posing the problem. Would love to see a solution based on that.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    11 hours ago
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You could also use your regularized grid with NDSolve`FiniteDifferenceDerivative to get the gradient at each point and just track that. It'd be more numerically efficient I think since this problem really can't get trapped in a spurious minimum (based on the plot)
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Another option if you want to go the Graph route is create a weighted GridGraph where the EdgeWeights are the squared differences in PE between points. Then you can use FindShortestPath.
    $endgroup$
    – b3m2a1
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I fiddled with a GridGraph a little. I was thinking that I could assign the point values to VertexWeight or EdgeWeightand then have it find a shortest/least costly path, but got bogged down in the details of posing the problem. Would love to see a solution based on that.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeY
    11 hours ago










1




1




$begingroup$
You could also use your regularized grid with NDSolve`FiniteDifferenceDerivative to get the gradient at each point and just track that. It'd be more numerically efficient I think since this problem really can't get trapped in a spurious minimum (based on the plot)
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
You could also use your regularized grid with NDSolve`FiniteDifferenceDerivative to get the gradient at each point and just track that. It'd be more numerically efficient I think since this problem really can't get trapped in a spurious minimum (based on the plot)
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
11 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Another option if you want to go the Graph route is create a weighted GridGraph where the EdgeWeights are the squared differences in PE between points. Then you can use FindShortestPath.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Another option if you want to go the Graph route is create a weighted GridGraph where the EdgeWeights are the squared differences in PE between points. Then you can use FindShortestPath.
$endgroup$
– b3m2a1
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
I fiddled with a GridGraph a little. I was thinking that I could assign the point values to VertexWeight or EdgeWeightand then have it find a shortest/least costly path, but got bogged down in the details of posing the problem. Would love to see a solution based on that.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
11 hours ago






$begingroup$
I fiddled with a GridGraph a little. I was thinking that I could assign the point values to VertexWeight or EdgeWeightand then have it find a shortest/least costly path, but got bogged down in the details of posing the problem. Would love to see a solution based on that.
$endgroup$
– MikeY
11 hours ago













4












$begingroup$

If I understand the problem correctly, we just need to extract the path from StreamPlot, don't we?



If you have difficulty in accessing the data in dropbox in the question, try the following:



Import["http://halirutan.github.io/Mathematica-SE-Tools/decode.m"]["http://i.stack.imgur.
com/eDzXT.png"]
SelectionMove[EvaluationNotebook[], Previous, Cell, 1];
dat = Uncompress@First@First@NotebookRead@EvaluationNotebook[];
NotebookDelete@EvaluationNotebook[];

func = Interpolation@dat;

{vx, vy} = Function[{x, y}, #] & /@ Grad[func[x, y], {x, y}];

begin = {180.0, 179.99};
end = {124.5, 124.49};

plot = StreamPlot[{vx[x, y], vy[x, y]}, {x, #, #2}, {y, #3, #4}, StreamPoints -> {begin},
StreamStyle -> "Line", Epilog -> Point@{begin, end}] & @@ Flatten@func["Domain"]


Mathematica graphics



path = Cases[Normal@plot, Line[a_] :> a, Infinity][[1]];

ListPlot3D@dat~Show~Graphics3D@Line[Flatten /@ ({path, func @@@ path}[Transpose])]


Mathematica graphics






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Whaow that's a simple solution :)
    $endgroup$
    – chris
    18 mins ago
















4












$begingroup$

If I understand the problem correctly, we just need to extract the path from StreamPlot, don't we?



If you have difficulty in accessing the data in dropbox in the question, try the following:



Import["http://halirutan.github.io/Mathematica-SE-Tools/decode.m"]["http://i.stack.imgur.
com/eDzXT.png"]
SelectionMove[EvaluationNotebook[], Previous, Cell, 1];
dat = Uncompress@First@First@NotebookRead@EvaluationNotebook[];
NotebookDelete@EvaluationNotebook[];

func = Interpolation@dat;

{vx, vy} = Function[{x, y}, #] & /@ Grad[func[x, y], {x, y}];

begin = {180.0, 179.99};
end = {124.5, 124.49};

plot = StreamPlot[{vx[x, y], vy[x, y]}, {x, #, #2}, {y, #3, #4}, StreamPoints -> {begin},
StreamStyle -> "Line", Epilog -> Point@{begin, end}] & @@ Flatten@func["Domain"]


Mathematica graphics



path = Cases[Normal@plot, Line[a_] :> a, Infinity][[1]];

ListPlot3D@dat~Show~Graphics3D@Line[Flatten /@ ({path, func @@@ path}[Transpose])]


Mathematica graphics






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Whaow that's a simple solution :)
    $endgroup$
    – chris
    18 mins ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$

If I understand the problem correctly, we just need to extract the path from StreamPlot, don't we?



If you have difficulty in accessing the data in dropbox in the question, try the following:



Import["http://halirutan.github.io/Mathematica-SE-Tools/decode.m"]["http://i.stack.imgur.
com/eDzXT.png"]
SelectionMove[EvaluationNotebook[], Previous, Cell, 1];
dat = Uncompress@First@First@NotebookRead@EvaluationNotebook[];
NotebookDelete@EvaluationNotebook[];

func = Interpolation@dat;

{vx, vy} = Function[{x, y}, #] & /@ Grad[func[x, y], {x, y}];

begin = {180.0, 179.99};
end = {124.5, 124.49};

plot = StreamPlot[{vx[x, y], vy[x, y]}, {x, #, #2}, {y, #3, #4}, StreamPoints -> {begin},
StreamStyle -> "Line", Epilog -> Point@{begin, end}] & @@ Flatten@func["Domain"]


Mathematica graphics



path = Cases[Normal@plot, Line[a_] :> a, Infinity][[1]];

ListPlot3D@dat~Show~Graphics3D@Line[Flatten /@ ({path, func @@@ path}[Transpose])]


Mathematica graphics






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



If I understand the problem correctly, we just need to extract the path from StreamPlot, don't we?



If you have difficulty in accessing the data in dropbox in the question, try the following:



Import["http://halirutan.github.io/Mathematica-SE-Tools/decode.m"]["http://i.stack.imgur.
com/eDzXT.png"]
SelectionMove[EvaluationNotebook[], Previous, Cell, 1];
dat = Uncompress@First@First@NotebookRead@EvaluationNotebook[];
NotebookDelete@EvaluationNotebook[];

func = Interpolation@dat;

{vx, vy} = Function[{x, y}, #] & /@ Grad[func[x, y], {x, y}];

begin = {180.0, 179.99};
end = {124.5, 124.49};

plot = StreamPlot[{vx[x, y], vy[x, y]}, {x, #, #2}, {y, #3, #4}, StreamPoints -> {begin},
StreamStyle -> "Line", Epilog -> Point@{begin, end}] & @@ Flatten@func["Domain"]


Mathematica graphics



path = Cases[Normal@plot, Line[a_] :> a, Infinity][[1]];

ListPlot3D@dat~Show~Graphics3D@Line[Flatten /@ ({path, func @@@ path}[Transpose])]


Mathematica graphics







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 3 hours ago









xzczdxzczd

27.1k472250




27.1k472250












  • $begingroup$
    Whaow that's a simple solution :)
    $endgroup$
    – chris
    18 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Whaow that's a simple solution :)
    $endgroup$
    – chris
    18 mins ago
















$begingroup$
Whaow that's a simple solution :)
$endgroup$
– chris
18 mins ago




$begingroup$
Whaow that's a simple solution :)
$endgroup$
– chris
18 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191925%2fminimum-energy-path-of-a-potential-energy-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Щит и меч (фильм) Содержание Названия серий | Сюжет |...

Венесуэла на летних Олимпийских играх 2000 Содержание Состав...

Meter-Bus Содержание Параметры шины | Стандартизация |...