Probability X1 ≥ X2In convergence in probability or a.s. convergence w.r.t which measure is the...

What happened to Hermione’s clothing and other possessions after she wiped her parents’ memories of her?

Is "accuse people to be racist" grammatical?

Was there a pre-determined arrangment for division of Germany in case it surrendered before any Soviet forces entered its territory?

Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?

Alternate timeline nomenclature

Is it possible to detect 100% of SQLi with a simple regex?

Crack the bank account's password!

Is it possible to methodically find the total of ways to read a given phrase making a stack?

What is wrong with my use of "find -print0"?

In the Lost in Space intro why was Dr. Smith actor listed as a special guest star?

Is the percentage symbol a constant?

Can you prevent a man in the middle from reading the message?

How to deal with an underperforming subordinate?

Is there a celebrity culture in academia and should we discourage it?

Taking an academic pseudonym?

Minimum Viable Product for RTS game?

Is it possible to narrate a novel in a faux-historical style without alienating the reader?

Including proofs of known theorems in master's thesis

What's the reason that we have different quantities of days each month?

Why did Ylvis use "go" instead of "say" in phrases like "Dog goes 'woof'"?

Why don't you get burned by the wood benches in a sauna?

How to write Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī?

Boss asked me to sign a resignation paper without a date on it along with my new contract

How bad is a Computer Science course that doesn't teach Design Patterns?



Probability X1 ≥ X2


In convergence in probability or a.s. convergence w.r.t which measure is the probability?Comparison of waiting times to geometric distributionShow that for a Geometric distribution, the probability generating function is given by $frac{ps}{1-qs}$, $q=1-p$Different ways of generating Geometric distributionsHow to calculate the sum or difference of two probability generating functions?How to check if functions of i.i.d random variables are dependent or independent?Calculating probability of floor'ed log-normal distributionConcepts of Probability all messed upGeometric distribution with random, varying success probabilityWhat can we say about $N_{i}$ where $N=N_{1}+cdots+N_{m}$, $Nthicksim Geom(frac{1-p}{p})$ and conditional distribution of $N_{j}$ is binomial













2












$begingroup$


Suppose X1 and X2 are independent Geometric p random variables. What is the
probability that X1 ≥ X2?



I am confused about this question because we aren't told anything about X1 and X2 other than they are Geometric. Wouldn't this be 50% because X1 and X2 can be anything in the range?



EDIT: New attempt
$P(X1 ≥ X2) = P(X1 > X2) + P(X1 = X2)$



$P(X1 = X2)$ = $sum_{x}$ $(1-p)^{x-1}p(1-p)^{x-1}p$ = $frac{p}{2-p}$



$P(X1 > X2)$ = $P(X1 < X2)$ and $P(X1 < X2) + P(X1 > X2) + P(X1 = X2) = 1$



Therefore, $P(X1 > X2)$ = $frac{1-P(X1 = X2)}{2}$ = $frac{1-p}{2-p}$
Adding $P(X1 = X2)=frac{p}{2-p}$ to that , I get $P(X1 ≥ X2)$ = $frac{1}{2-p}$



Is this correct?






random-variable geometric-distribution







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please add the 'self-study' tag.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Actually because X1 and X2 are discrete variables the equality makes things a bit less obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    4 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$


Suppose X1 and X2 are independent Geometric p random variables. What is the
probability that X1 ≥ X2?



I am confused about this question because we aren't told anything about X1 and X2 other than they are Geometric. Wouldn't this be 50% because X1 and X2 can be anything in the range?



EDIT: New attempt
$P(X1 ≥ X2) = P(X1 > X2) + P(X1 = X2)$



$P(X1 = X2)$ = $sum_{x}$ $(1-p)^{x-1}p(1-p)^{x-1}p$ = $frac{p}{2-p}$



$P(X1 > X2)$ = $P(X1 < X2)$ and $P(X1 < X2) + P(X1 > X2) + P(X1 = X2) = 1$



Therefore, $P(X1 > X2)$ = $frac{1-P(X1 = X2)}{2}$ = $frac{1-p}{2-p}$
Adding $P(X1 = X2)=frac{p}{2-p}$ to that , I get $P(X1 ≥ X2)$ = $frac{1}{2-p}$



Is this correct?






random-variable geometric-distribution







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please add the 'self-study' tag.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Actually because X1 and X2 are discrete variables the equality makes things a bit less obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    4 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Suppose X1 and X2 are independent Geometric p random variables. What is the
probability that X1 ≥ X2?



I am confused about this question because we aren't told anything about X1 and X2 other than they are Geometric. Wouldn't this be 50% because X1 and X2 can be anything in the range?



EDIT: New attempt
$P(X1 ≥ X2) = P(X1 > X2) + P(X1 = X2)$



$P(X1 = X2)$ = $sum_{x}$ $(1-p)^{x-1}p(1-p)^{x-1}p$ = $frac{p}{2-p}$



$P(X1 > X2)$ = $P(X1 < X2)$ and $P(X1 < X2) + P(X1 > X2) + P(X1 = X2) = 1$



Therefore, $P(X1 > X2)$ = $frac{1-P(X1 = X2)}{2}$ = $frac{1-p}{2-p}$
Adding $P(X1 = X2)=frac{p}{2-p}$ to that , I get $P(X1 ≥ X2)$ = $frac{1}{2-p}$



Is this correct?






random-variable geometric-distribution







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose X1 and X2 are independent Geometric p random variables. What is the
probability that X1 ≥ X2?



I am confused about this question because we aren't told anything about X1 and X2 other than they are Geometric. Wouldn't this be 50% because X1 and X2 can be anything in the range?



EDIT: New attempt
$P(X1 ≥ X2) = P(X1 > X2) + P(X1 = X2)$



$P(X1 = X2)$ = $sum_{x}$ $(1-p)^{x-1}p(1-p)^{x-1}p$ = $frac{p}{2-p}$



$P(X1 > X2)$ = $P(X1 < X2)$ and $P(X1 < X2) + P(X1 > X2) + P(X1 = X2) = 1$



Therefore, $P(X1 > X2)$ = $frac{1-P(X1 = X2)}{2}$ = $frac{1-p}{2-p}$
Adding $P(X1 = X2)=frac{p}{2-p}$ to that , I get $P(X1 ≥ X2)$ = $frac{1}{2-p}$



Is this correct?






random-variable geometric-distribution




random-variable geometric-distribution






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







Sra

















asked 5 hours ago









SraSra

464




464








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please add the 'self-study' tag.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Actually because X1 and X2 are discrete variables the equality makes things a bit less obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    4 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please add the 'self-study' tag.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Actually because X1 and X2 are discrete variables the equality makes things a bit less obvious.
    $endgroup$
    – usεr11852
    4 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Please add the 'self-study' tag.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Please add the 'self-study' tag.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Actually because X1 and X2 are discrete variables the equality makes things a bit less obvious.
$endgroup$
– usεr11852
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Actually because X1 and X2 are discrete variables the equality makes things a bit less obvious.
$endgroup$
– usεr11852
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It can't be $50%$ because $P(X_1=X_2)>0$



One approach:



Consider the three events $P(X_1>X_2), P(X_2>X_1)$ and $P(X_1=X_2)$, which partition the sample space.



There's an obvious connection between the first two. Write an expression for the third and simplify. Hence solve the question.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I edited, my post with my new answer. Could you take a look and see if it's correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Sra
    1 hour ago



















0












$begingroup$

Your answer, following Glen's suggestion, is correct. Another, less elegant, way is just to condition:



begin{align}
Pr{X_1geq X_2} &= sum_{k=0}^infty Pr{X_1geq X_2mid X_2=k} Pr{X_2=k} \ &= sum_{k=0}^infty sum_{ell=k}^infty Pr{X_1=ell}Pr{X_2=k}.
end{align}



This will give you the same $1/(2-p)$, after handling the two geometric series. Glen's way is better.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f394042%2fprobability-x1-%25e2%2589%25a5-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    It can't be $50%$ because $P(X_1=X_2)>0$



    One approach:



    Consider the three events $P(X_1>X_2), P(X_2>X_1)$ and $P(X_1=X_2)$, which partition the sample space.



    There's an obvious connection between the first two. Write an expression for the third and simplify. Hence solve the question.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I edited, my post with my new answer. Could you take a look and see if it's correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Sra
      1 hour ago
















    5












    $begingroup$

    It can't be $50%$ because $P(X_1=X_2)>0$



    One approach:



    Consider the three events $P(X_1>X_2), P(X_2>X_1)$ and $P(X_1=X_2)$, which partition the sample space.



    There's an obvious connection between the first two. Write an expression for the third and simplify. Hence solve the question.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I edited, my post with my new answer. Could you take a look and see if it's correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Sra
      1 hour ago














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    It can't be $50%$ because $P(X_1=X_2)>0$



    One approach:



    Consider the three events $P(X_1>X_2), P(X_2>X_1)$ and $P(X_1=X_2)$, which partition the sample space.



    There's an obvious connection between the first two. Write an expression for the third and simplify. Hence solve the question.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    It can't be $50%$ because $P(X_1=X_2)>0$



    One approach:



    Consider the three events $P(X_1>X_2), P(X_2>X_1)$ and $P(X_1=X_2)$, which partition the sample space.



    There's an obvious connection between the first two. Write an expression for the third and simplify. Hence solve the question.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 4 hours ago

























    answered 4 hours ago









    Glen_b♦Glen_b

    212k22406754




    212k22406754












    • $begingroup$
      I edited, my post with my new answer. Could you take a look and see if it's correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Sra
      1 hour ago


















    • $begingroup$
      I edited, my post with my new answer. Could you take a look and see if it's correct?
      $endgroup$
      – Sra
      1 hour ago
















    $begingroup$
    I edited, my post with my new answer. Could you take a look and see if it's correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Sra
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I edited, my post with my new answer. Could you take a look and see if it's correct?
    $endgroup$
    – Sra
    1 hour ago













    0












    $begingroup$

    Your answer, following Glen's suggestion, is correct. Another, less elegant, way is just to condition:



    begin{align}
    Pr{X_1geq X_2} &= sum_{k=0}^infty Pr{X_1geq X_2mid X_2=k} Pr{X_2=k} \ &= sum_{k=0}^infty sum_{ell=k}^infty Pr{X_1=ell}Pr{X_2=k}.
    end{align}



    This will give you the same $1/(2-p)$, after handling the two geometric series. Glen's way is better.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Your answer, following Glen's suggestion, is correct. Another, less elegant, way is just to condition:



      begin{align}
      Pr{X_1geq X_2} &= sum_{k=0}^infty Pr{X_1geq X_2mid X_2=k} Pr{X_2=k} \ &= sum_{k=0}^infty sum_{ell=k}^infty Pr{X_1=ell}Pr{X_2=k}.
      end{align}



      This will give you the same $1/(2-p)$, after handling the two geometric series. Glen's way is better.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Your answer, following Glen's suggestion, is correct. Another, less elegant, way is just to condition:



        begin{align}
        Pr{X_1geq X_2} &= sum_{k=0}^infty Pr{X_1geq X_2mid X_2=k} Pr{X_2=k} \ &= sum_{k=0}^infty sum_{ell=k}^infty Pr{X_1=ell}Pr{X_2=k}.
        end{align}



        This will give you the same $1/(2-p)$, after handling the two geometric series. Glen's way is better.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Your answer, following Glen's suggestion, is correct. Another, less elegant, way is just to condition:



        begin{align}
        Pr{X_1geq X_2} &= sum_{k=0}^infty Pr{X_1geq X_2mid X_2=k} Pr{X_2=k} \ &= sum_{k=0}^infty sum_{ell=k}^infty Pr{X_1=ell}Pr{X_2=k}.
        end{align}



        This will give you the same $1/(2-p)$, after handling the two geometric series. Glen's way is better.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 19 mins ago









        Paulo C. Marques F.Paulo C. Marques F.

        16.9k35397




        16.9k35397






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f394042%2fprobability-x1-%25e2%2589%25a5-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Щит и меч (фильм) Содержание Названия серий | Сюжет |...

            Image
            Фильмы по алфавитуФильмы 1968 годаФильмы СССР 1968 годаЧёрно-белые фильмы СССРФильмы студии «Мосфильм»Лидеры советского кинопрокатаФильмы-драмы СССРФильмы о Второй мировой войнеФильмы о шпионахЭкранизации произведений Вадима КожевниковаФильмы Владимира БасоваФильмы о фашизме 1968 годуодноимённому романуВадима КожевниковаВладимиром БасовымСтанислав ЛюбшинГерманиюАбверегауптштурмфюрераССБерлинслужбу СДSchwarzbraun ist die HaselnussXVIII векаЭрикиХермса НиляГитлерюгендаАбвераАх, мой милый АвгустинXVII векаHorst WesselDeutschland über alles У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. Щит и меч. Щит и меч Жанр драма военный фильм Режиссёр Владимир Басов Автор сценария Владимир Басов Вадим Кожевников В главных ролях Станислав Любшин Валентина Титова Олег Янковский Георгий Мартынюк Владимир Басов Оператор Тимофей Лебешев Композитор Вениамин Баснер Кинокомпания Киностудия «Мосфильм». Творческое объединение писателей и киноработников
            Read more

            Венесуэла на летних Олимпийских играх 2000 Содержание Состав...

            Image
            БангладешБахрейнБутанБрунейВьетнамГонконгИндияИндонезияИорданияИракИранЙеменКазахстанКамбоджаКатарКитайКиргизияКНДРКувейтЛаосЛиванМалайзияМальдивыМонголияМьянмаНепалОАЭОман ПакистанГосударство ПалестинаСаудовская АравияСингапурСирияТаджикистанТаиландТайваньТуркменияУзбекистанФилиппиныШри-ЛанкаЮжная КореяЯпонияИндивидуальные олимпийские спортсменыАлжирАнголаБенинБотсванаБуркина-ФасоБурундиГабонГамбияГанаГвинеяГвинея-БисауДемократическая Республика КонгоДжибутиЕгипетЗамбияЗимбабвеКабо-ВердеКамерунКенияКоморские островаКот-д’ИвуарЛесотоЛиберияЛивияМаврикийМавританияМадагаскарМалавиМалиМароккоМозамбикНамибияНигерНигерияРеспублика КонгоРуандаСан-Томе и ПринсипиСвазилендСейшелыСенегалСомалиСуданСьерра-ЛеонеТанзанияТогоТунисУгандаЦентральноафриканская РеспубликаЧадЭкваториальная ГвинеяЭритреяЭфиопияЮАРАвстралияАмериканское СамоаВануатуГуамМикронезияНауруНовая ЗеландияОстрова КукаПалауПапуа — Новая ГвинеяСамоаСоломоновы ОстроваТонгаФиджи Венесуэла на Олимпийских играх2000 год в ВенесуэлеСтран
            Read more

            Meter-Bus Содержание Параметры шины | Стандартизация |...

            Image
            RS-232IrDAHARTмодемтоковая петляИРПСMIDIIO-LinkRS-422RS-423RS-485LINM-BusKansas City StandardКомпакт-кассетагрампластинкаPPPSLIPIrDAHARTISO 7816MIDIIO-LinkModbusLINDMX-512P-NETProfibusIEC 608708250 UART16550 UART Сетевые протоколыПоследовательные шины физического уровняполевой шиныасинхронного интерфейсаOpen Metering SystemAESздесь У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. M-bus (значения). M-Bus (Meter-Bus) — стандарт физического уровня для полевой шины на основе асинхронного интерфейса. Также под этим названием понимают коммуникационный протокол, используемый для связи устройств по этой шине. M-bus преимущественно применяется для приборов учета электрической энергии (электросчётчики), тепловой энергии (теплосчётчики), расходомеров воды и газа. Данные передаются на компьютерную станцию (сервер) напрямую или через концентраторы шины M-Bus, а также усилители-повторители сигнала. Содержание 1 Параметры шины 2 Стандартизация 2.1 Open Metering System
            Read more