How to prove teleportation does not violate non-cloning theorem?What is quantum gate teleportation?Using a...
What formula could mimic the following curve?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
What's the most convenient time of year in the USA to end the world?
If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?
Strange Sign on Lab Door
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
How to remove trailing forward slash
Program that converts a number to a letter of the alphabet
Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits
Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?
Trouble with Impersonal Passive Voice usage
How experienced do I need to be to go on a photography workshop?
Using loops to create tables
Closed form for these polynomials?
What do you call a fact that doesn't match the settings?
When does coming up with an idea constitute sufficient contribution for authorship?
Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?
Am I a Rude Number?
Is there hidden data in this .blend file? Trying to minimize the file size
How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?
Rear brake cable temporary fix possible?
A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?
Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview
Can pricing be copyrighted?
How to prove teleportation does not violate non-cloning theorem?
What is quantum gate teleportation?Using a fractional number of classical bits within quantum teleportationNo-cloning theorem and distinguishing between two non-orthogonal quantum statesWhen you act on a multi-qubit system with a 2-qubit gate, what happens to the third qubit?Applying CNOT with local operations and two EPR pairsQuantum teleportation: second classical bit for removing entanglement?BB84 attack with entangled qubits exampleControlling high-dimensional Hilbert spaces with a single qubitWhat does teleportation have to do w/ XOR linked lists?Construction of optimal ensemble to show quantum steerability
$begingroup$
For a given teleportation process as depicted in the figure, how one can say that teleporting the qubit state $|qrangle$ has not cloned at the end of Bob's measurement?
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a given teleportation process as depicted in the figure, how one can say that teleporting the qubit state $|qrangle$ has not cloned at the end of Bob's measurement?
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For a given teleportation process as depicted in the figure, how one can say that teleporting the qubit state $|qrangle$ has not cloned at the end of Bob's measurement?
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
For a given teleportation process as depicted in the figure, how one can say that teleporting the qubit state $|qrangle$ has not cloned at the end of Bob's measurement?
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
algorithm entanglement teleportation no-cloning-theorem
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
edited 1 hour ago
Blue♦
6,29541355
6,29541355
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
asked 2 hours ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 21 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5598%2fhow-to-prove-teleportation-does-not-violate-non-cloning-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
$endgroup$
There's nothing to prove as such here. It is evident from the teleportation protocol itself.
Yes, at the conclusion of the teleportation protocol, Bob's qubit certainly will take on the same state as Alice's qubit's initial state i.e. $|qrangle$. However, Alice's qubit will now exist as an inseparable part of an entangled Bell state. You haven't really been able to create a "copy" of Alice's qubit, in the sense that Alice's qubit's initial state is "destroyed" in the process and is no longer $|qrangle$.
In (crude) analogical terms, in the quantum teleportation protocol you "cut and paste" the state $|qrangle$ rather than "copying and pasting". So there's no violation of the No cloning theorem!
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
edited 29 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
answered 1 hour ago
Blue♦Blue
6,29541355
6,29541355
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 21 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 21 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 21 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I.e., if we have the entire initial state is written as follows
$| q rangle otimes | beta_{00} rangle =(alpha | 0rangle+beta | 1 rangle ) otimes frac{1}{sqrt{2}}( |00rangle+| 11 rangle )= frac{1}{sqrt{2}}(alpha | 000rangle+alpha | 011 rangle+beta | 100 rangle+beta | 111 rangle )$ ,
then, after the measurement, we obtain the state
$|psi rangle equiv{ |00rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle+beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 01 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle+beta | 0rangle}{2}+| 10 rangle frac{alpha | 0 rangle-beta | 1rangle}{2}+| 11 rangle frac{alpha | 1 rangle-beta | 0rangle}{2} }$ ,
hence we can no longer write
$| q rangle otimes | something rangle$ ,
namely, we can't factorize $| q rangle$ outside the result which implies that it didn't produce again.
answered 21 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 21 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 21 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
answered 21 mins ago
Student404MusStudent404Mus
163
163
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Student404Mus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5598%2fhow-to-prove-teleportation-does-not-violate-non-cloning-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
