Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?

How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?

Map of water taps to fill bottles

Re-entry to Germany after vacation using blue card

a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat

Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?

How did Captain America manage to do this?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Two field separators (colon and space) in awk

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

A strange hotel

Should the Death Curse affect an undead PC in the Tomb of Annihilation adventure?

How does a program know if stdout is connected to a terminal or a pipe?

On The Origin of Dissonant Chords

What are the characteristics of a typeless programming language?

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?

Multiple options vs single option UI

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

How can I practically buy stocks?

Was Dennis Ritchie being too modest in this quote about C and Pascal?

Does tea made with boiling water cool faster than tea made with boiled (but still hot) water?

Providing evidence of Consent of Parents for Marriage by minor in England in early 1800s?

Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?

Is Thunderwave centered on the caster?Spell Area of Effect RangeDoes forced movement, as in Thunderwave, necessarily break a grapple?Does Thunderwave's push effect knock away incoming spells/projectiles?Is this homebrew sword of wind control based on “Grasscutter” overpowered?Is this Library-encounter balanced?Stampede: How does this custom spell compare to Cloudkill, another 5th level spell?Is there a reason this homebrew spell wouldn't work with the Attack action?Is this homebrew Spiritual Shield spell balanced?Is this homebrew Elementalist Fighter class balanced?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

3

1

$begingroup$

Is this homebrew spell balanced?

Wind Wave

1st-level evocation

Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous

A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.

On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.

In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.

At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.

dnd-5e spells homebrew balance

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

28.1k5101171

asked 3 hours ago

Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan

1,064124

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

1

$begingroup$

Is this homebrew spell balanced?

Wind Wave

1st-level evocation

Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous

A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.

On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.

In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.

At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.

dnd-5e spells homebrew balance

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

28.1k5101171

asked 3 hours ago

Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan

1,064124

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  3 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Is this homebrew spell balanced?

Wind Wave

1st-level evocation

Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous

A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.

On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.

In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.

At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.

dnd-5e spells homebrew balance

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

28.1k5101171

asked 3 hours ago

Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan

1,064124

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

28.1k5101171

asked 3 hours ago

Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan

1,064124

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

28.1k5101171

asked 3 hours ago

Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan

1,064124

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

28.1k5101171

edited 3 hours ago

V2Blast

28.1k5101171

asked 3 hours ago

Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan

1,064124

asked 3 hours ago

Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan

1,064124

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

3

$begingroup$

Pretty darn close!

First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.

The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."

I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme

24.6k589143

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
  $endgroup$
  – Ryan Thompson
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.

• The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.




• The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.




• This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.




• The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MinimanMiniman

115k29525715

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146976%2fis-this-homebrew-wind-wave-spell-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

$begingroup$

Pretty darn close!

First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.

The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."

I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme

24.6k589143

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
  $endgroup$
  – Ryan Thompson
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

Pretty darn close!

First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.

The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."

I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme

24.6k589143

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
  $endgroup$
  – Ryan Thompson
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Pretty darn close!

First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.

The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."

I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme

24.6k589143

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

edited 2 hours ago

answered 2 hours ago

GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme

24.6k589143

answered 2 hours ago

GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme

24.6k589143

answered 2 hours ago

GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme

24.6k589143

3

$begingroup$

This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.

• The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.




• The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.




• This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.




• The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MinimanMiniman

115k29525715

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.

• The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.




• The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.




• This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.




• The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MinimanMiniman

115k29525715

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.

• The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.




• The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.




• This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.




• The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MinimanMiniman

115k29525715

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MinimanMiniman

115k29525715

answered 1 hour ago

MinimanMiniman

115k29525715

answered 1 hour ago

MinimanMiniman

115k29525715