Size of electromagnet needed to replicate Earth's magnetic fieldCan superconducting magnets fly (or repel the...
A Note on N!
Can we say “you can pay when the order gets ready”?
Implications of cigar-shaped bodies having rings?
Relationship between strut and baselineskip
Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?
On The Origin of Dissonant Chords
I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?
Alignment of various blocks in tikz
Can an Area of Effect spell cast outside a Prismatic Wall extend inside it?
555 timer FM transmitter
Rivers without rain
How to have a sharp product image?
Providing evidence of Consent of Parents for Marriage by minor in England in early 1800s?
acheter à, to mean both "from" and "for"?
What does ゆーか mean?
Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
If a planet has 3 moons, is it possible to have triple Full/New Moons at once?
Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
What is causing the white spot to appear in some of my pictures
Apply MapThread to all but one variable
Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?
How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?
Size of electromagnet needed to replicate Earth's magnetic field
Can superconducting magnets fly (or repel the earth's core)?How to size an electromagnetWhy is the magnetic field stronger at the edges of a bar magnet?Can you create a powerful magnetic field out of confined circulating electrons only?Repelling a weak permanent magnet with an electromagnetGraphene - Can it produce a magnetic field?Feasiblity of a long spinning top using an electromagnet to pull on Earth's magnetic fieldHow strong is Earth's magnetic field in space?Why doesn't a permanent magnetic field not make a florescent light illuminate like an electromagnet field?Mini rail gun to build at home
$begingroup$
I guess the title says it all. How big of an electromagnet would you need to generate a magnetic field the same as Earth's? Like, what kind of amperes are we talking here? (Assuming a hypothetical superconducting magnet, of course.)
electromagnetism magnetic-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess the title says it all. How big of an electromagnet would you need to generate a magnetic field the same as Earth's? Like, what kind of amperes are we talking here? (Assuming a hypothetical superconducting magnet, of course.)
electromagnetism magnetic-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess the title says it all. How big of an electromagnet would you need to generate a magnetic field the same as Earth's? Like, what kind of amperes are we talking here? (Assuming a hypothetical superconducting magnet, of course.)
electromagnetism magnetic-fields
$endgroup$
I guess the title says it all. How big of an electromagnet would you need to generate a magnetic field the same as Earth's? Like, what kind of amperes are we talking here? (Assuming a hypothetical superconducting magnet, of course.)
electromagnetism magnetic-fields
electromagnetism magnetic-fields
asked 5 hours ago
Lajos NagyLajos Nagy
1683
1683
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are in luck, since Osamu Motojima and Nagato Yanagi have already calculated it for you in their report Feasibility of Artificial Geomagnetic Field Generation by a Superconducting Ring Network. They conclude that producing 10% of the current field is feasible using "12 latitudinal high-temperature superconducting rings, each carrying 6.4 MA current with a modest 1 GW of power requirement".
(The motivation for the report is the concern about the consequences of Earth losing its field during a geomagnetic reversal, but it doesn't look like those are particularly bad.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476299%2fsize-of-electromagnet-needed-to-replicate-earths-magnetic-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You are in luck, since Osamu Motojima and Nagato Yanagi have already calculated it for you in their report Feasibility of Artificial Geomagnetic Field Generation by a Superconducting Ring Network. They conclude that producing 10% of the current field is feasible using "12 latitudinal high-temperature superconducting rings, each carrying 6.4 MA current with a modest 1 GW of power requirement".
(The motivation for the report is the concern about the consequences of Earth losing its field during a geomagnetic reversal, but it doesn't look like those are particularly bad.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are in luck, since Osamu Motojima and Nagato Yanagi have already calculated it for you in their report Feasibility of Artificial Geomagnetic Field Generation by a Superconducting Ring Network. They conclude that producing 10% of the current field is feasible using "12 latitudinal high-temperature superconducting rings, each carrying 6.4 MA current with a modest 1 GW of power requirement".
(The motivation for the report is the concern about the consequences of Earth losing its field during a geomagnetic reversal, but it doesn't look like those are particularly bad.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are in luck, since Osamu Motojima and Nagato Yanagi have already calculated it for you in their report Feasibility of Artificial Geomagnetic Field Generation by a Superconducting Ring Network. They conclude that producing 10% of the current field is feasible using "12 latitudinal high-temperature superconducting rings, each carrying 6.4 MA current with a modest 1 GW of power requirement".
(The motivation for the report is the concern about the consequences of Earth losing its field during a geomagnetic reversal, but it doesn't look like those are particularly bad.)
$endgroup$
You are in luck, since Osamu Motojima and Nagato Yanagi have already calculated it for you in their report Feasibility of Artificial Geomagnetic Field Generation by a Superconducting Ring Network. They conclude that producing 10% of the current field is feasible using "12 latitudinal high-temperature superconducting rings, each carrying 6.4 MA current with a modest 1 GW of power requirement".
(The motivation for the report is the concern about the consequences of Earth losing its field during a geomagnetic reversal, but it doesn't look like those are particularly bad.)
answered 3 hours ago
Anders SandbergAnders Sandberg
10.4k21531
10.4k21531
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476299%2fsize-of-electromagnet-needed-to-replicate-earths-magnetic-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown