Vjylku

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

Should I join an office cleaning event for free?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

Non-Jewish family in an Orthodox Jewish Wedding

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Example of a relative pronoun

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

How is this relation reflexive?

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Schwarzchild Radius of the Universe

Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?

Copycat chess is back

Calculus Optimization - Point on graph closest to given point

Shell script can be run only with sh command

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Can town administrative "code" overule state laws like those forbidding trespassing?

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

What does “enim et” mean?

What does “angelorum planta agmini” mean?What does the clause “quae suae salvationis causa exstitit” mean?Does 'concrescere' take dative?What does “illos” refer to in this passage from Seneca?Does Tolle fidem, culpam dare convey the correct meaning?What do the future active participle “editurus” and the gerundive or gerund “scribendum” mean in this sentence?What does Seculum Seculi mean?Does this translation make sense?What does “Pulchre vive, vehementer somina, ardenter ama” mean?What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

1

A couple days ago, a friend sent me an excerpt from a new game, asking about a Latin phrase in it:

Contra Diabolus enim et alii Daemones

(In the game, this is the motto of a group of Catholic monster hunters—so it's meant to be Church Latin, not Classical.)

The translation seems fairly straightforward: "Against the Devil and other Demons". I would have used diabolum in the accusative, but that's a separate matter.

What confused me, though, was the word enim in the middle. I would normally translate enim as "for" or "because". So what's it doing here, right before et? Is it just an error on the translator's part, or is this a usage of enim I'm not familiar with?

motto grammar-identification ecclesiastical-latin

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22474

add a comment | 

1

A couple days ago, a friend sent me an excerpt from a new game, asking about a Latin phrase in it:

Contra Diabolus enim et alii Daemones

(In the game, this is the motto of a group of Catholic monster hunters—so it's meant to be Church Latin, not Classical.)

The translation seems fairly straightforward: "Against the Devil and other Demons". I would have used diabolum in the accusative, but that's a separate matter.

What confused me, though, was the word enim in the middle. I would normally translate enim as "for" or "because". So what's it doing here, right before et? Is it just an error on the translator's part, or is this a usage of enim I'm not familiar with?

motto grammar-identification ecclesiastical-latin

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22474

add a comment | 

A couple days ago, a friend sent me an excerpt from a new game, asking about a Latin phrase in it:

Contra Diabolus enim et alii Daemones

(In the game, this is the motto of a group of Catholic monster hunters—so it's meant to be Church Latin, not Classical.)

The translation seems fairly straightforward: "Against the Devil and other Demons". I would have used diabolum in the accusative, but that's a separate matter.

What confused me, though, was the word enim in the middle. I would normally translate enim as "for" or "because". So what's it doing here, right before et? Is it just an error on the translator's part, or is this a usage of enim I'm not familiar with?

motto grammar-identification ecclesiastical-latin

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22474

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22474

share|improve this question

asked 1 hour ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22474

asked 1 hour ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22474

asked 1 hour ago

DraconisDraconis

18.2k22474

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

A quick web search shows that the phrase 'Diabolus enim et alii Daemones' (without the contra) appears to originate from the Fourth Council of the Lateran (1215). The full sentence is Diabolus enim et alii daemones a Deo quidem natura creati sunt boni, sed ipsi per se facti sunt mali, which I would translate as something like, 'For the Devil and other demons were created by God (to be) good by nature, it's true, but they became, on their own, through their own agency, wicked.'

I suspect that whoever created the phrase for the game knew of this sentence, knew that contra means 'against', but didn't know that it requires a change of case or that enim doesn't really belong unless it's serving a connecting function; therefore, he or she just stuck contra at the beginning instead of changing to contra Diabolum et alios daemones.

share|improve this answer

edited 27 mins ago

answered 41 mins ago

cnreadcnread

9,01211124

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Excellent! I think this is the right answer—am I correct in translating that sentence as "for the Devil and other demons, created by God, are indeed good by nature, but their deeds in and of themselves are evil"? I'm never sure when translating Church Latin if I'm missing some crucial nuance.
  
  – Draconis
  35 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Draconis This does indeed sound like a very plausible answer. I'd read the end of the sentence as "but became evil on their own" or something similar. That is, I see ipsi facti sunt mali as "they themselves became evil".
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  28 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Draconis, I updated the answer with my attempt at a translation – admittedly, a somewhat heavy-handed one.
  
  – cnread
  26 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

I would indeed expect the accusatives Diabolum and alios together with contra.
But there is a way to make the nominative work; then contra has to be read as an adverb, not a preposition (which would require accusative).
Ignoring the enim, the whole phrase could be read as "in front [of us are] the Devil and other Demons".

To make sense of enim, I think it modifies the entire motto, not just the second part.
It usually comes as the second word, but if the first two words are closely connected, it can come a little later.
This tight connection would make sense for me if contra was used as a preposition, but not so much in the adverbial use.
I find the position a little odd but not completely wrong.

As Leqis and Short write, enim is a corroborative particle.
An apt English counterpart here might be "indeed".
Therefore I would read the whole as:

In front [of us are] indeed the Devil and other Demons

However, this does feel a little odd.
Enim is in a weird place (and not even necessary in my opinion), and the use of contra strikes me as weird too.
The motto may well be a well-composed Latin motto, but it could also be a mistaken attempt at translating "Against the Devil and other Demons".

share|improve this answer

answered 46 mins ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49k1271287

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9426%2fwhat-does-enim-et-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

A quick web search shows that the phrase 'Diabolus enim et alii Daemones' (without the contra) appears to originate from the Fourth Council of the Lateran (1215). The full sentence is Diabolus enim et alii daemones a Deo quidem natura creati sunt boni, sed ipsi per se facti sunt mali, which I would translate as something like, 'For the Devil and other demons were created by God (to be) good by nature, it's true, but they became, on their own, through their own agency, wicked.'

I suspect that whoever created the phrase for the game knew of this sentence, knew that contra means 'against', but didn't know that it requires a change of case or that enim doesn't really belong unless it's serving a connecting function; therefore, he or she just stuck contra at the beginning instead of changing to contra Diabolum et alios daemones.

share|improve this answer

edited 27 mins ago

answered 41 mins ago

cnreadcnread

9,01211124

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Excellent! I think this is the right answer—am I correct in translating that sentence as "for the Devil and other demons, created by God, are indeed good by nature, but their deeds in and of themselves are evil"? I'm never sure when translating Church Latin if I'm missing some crucial nuance.
  
  – Draconis
  35 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Draconis This does indeed sound like a very plausible answer. I'd read the end of the sentence as "but became evil on their own" or something similar. That is, I see ipsi facti sunt mali as "they themselves became evil".
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  28 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Draconis, I updated the answer with my attempt at a translation – admittedly, a somewhat heavy-handed one.
  
  – cnread
  26 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

A quick web search shows that the phrase 'Diabolus enim et alii Daemones' (without the contra) appears to originate from the Fourth Council of the Lateran (1215). The full sentence is Diabolus enim et alii daemones a Deo quidem natura creati sunt boni, sed ipsi per se facti sunt mali, which I would translate as something like, 'For the Devil and other demons were created by God (to be) good by nature, it's true, but they became, on their own, through their own agency, wicked.'

I suspect that whoever created the phrase for the game knew of this sentence, knew that contra means 'against', but didn't know that it requires a change of case or that enim doesn't really belong unless it's serving a connecting function; therefore, he or she just stuck contra at the beginning instead of changing to contra Diabolum et alios daemones.

share|improve this answer

edited 27 mins ago

answered 41 mins ago

cnreadcnread

9,01211124

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Excellent! I think this is the right answer—am I correct in translating that sentence as "for the Devil and other demons, created by God, are indeed good by nature, but their deeds in and of themselves are evil"? I'm never sure when translating Church Latin if I'm missing some crucial nuance.
  
  – Draconis
  35 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Draconis This does indeed sound like a very plausible answer. I'd read the end of the sentence as "but became evil on their own" or something similar. That is, I see ipsi facti sunt mali as "they themselves became evil".
  
  – Joonas Ilmavirta♦
  28 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Draconis, I updated the answer with my attempt at a translation – admittedly, a somewhat heavy-handed one.
  
  – cnread
  26 mins ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

A quick web search shows that the phrase 'Diabolus enim et alii Daemones' (without the contra) appears to originate from the Fourth Council of the Lateran (1215). The full sentence is Diabolus enim et alii daemones a Deo quidem natura creati sunt boni, sed ipsi per se facti sunt mali, which I would translate as something like, 'For the Devil and other demons were created by God (to be) good by nature, it's true, but they became, on their own, through their own agency, wicked.'

I suspect that whoever created the phrase for the game knew of this sentence, knew that contra means 'against', but didn't know that it requires a change of case or that enim doesn't really belong unless it's serving a connecting function; therefore, he or she just stuck contra at the beginning instead of changing to contra Diabolum et alios daemones.

share|improve this answer

edited 27 mins ago

answered 41 mins ago

cnreadcnread

9,01211124

share|improve this answer

edited 27 mins ago

answered 41 mins ago

cnreadcnread

9,01211124

answered 41 mins ago

cnreadcnread

9,01211124

answered 41 mins ago

cnreadcnread

9,01211124

1

I would indeed expect the accusatives Diabolum and alios together with contra.
But there is a way to make the nominative work; then contra has to be read as an adverb, not a preposition (which would require accusative).
Ignoring the enim, the whole phrase could be read as "in front [of us are] the Devil and other Demons".

To make sense of enim, I think it modifies the entire motto, not just the second part.
It usually comes as the second word, but if the first two words are closely connected, it can come a little later.
This tight connection would make sense for me if contra was used as a preposition, but not so much in the adverbial use.
I find the position a little odd but not completely wrong.

As Leqis and Short write, enim is a corroborative particle.
An apt English counterpart here might be "indeed".
Therefore I would read the whole as:

In front [of us are] indeed the Devil and other Demons

However, this does feel a little odd.
Enim is in a weird place (and not even necessary in my opinion), and the use of contra strikes me as weird too.
The motto may well be a well-composed Latin motto, but it could also be a mistaken attempt at translating "Against the Devil and other Demons".

share|improve this answer

answered 46 mins ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49k1271287

add a comment | 

1

I would indeed expect the accusatives Diabolum and alios together with contra.
But there is a way to make the nominative work; then contra has to be read as an adverb, not a preposition (which would require accusative).
Ignoring the enim, the whole phrase could be read as "in front [of us are] the Devil and other Demons".

To make sense of enim, I think it modifies the entire motto, not just the second part.
It usually comes as the second word, but if the first two words are closely connected, it can come a little later.
This tight connection would make sense for me if contra was used as a preposition, but not so much in the adverbial use.
I find the position a little odd but not completely wrong.

As Leqis and Short write, enim is a corroborative particle.
An apt English counterpart here might be "indeed".
Therefore I would read the whole as:

In front [of us are] indeed the Devil and other Demons

However, this does feel a little odd.
Enim is in a weird place (and not even necessary in my opinion), and the use of contra strikes me as weird too.
The motto may well be a well-composed Latin motto, but it could also be a mistaken attempt at translating "Against the Devil and other Demons".

share|improve this answer

answered 46 mins ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49k1271287

add a comment | 

I would indeed expect the accusatives Diabolum and alios together with contra.
But there is a way to make the nominative work; then contra has to be read as an adverb, not a preposition (which would require accusative).
Ignoring the enim, the whole phrase could be read as "in front [of us are] the Devil and other Demons".

To make sense of enim, I think it modifies the entire motto, not just the second part.
It usually comes as the second word, but if the first two words are closely connected, it can come a little later.
This tight connection would make sense for me if contra was used as a preposition, but not so much in the adverbial use.
I find the position a little odd but not completely wrong.

As Leqis and Short write, enim is a corroborative particle.
An apt English counterpart here might be "indeed".
Therefore I would read the whole as:

In front [of us are] indeed the Devil and other Demons

However, this does feel a little odd.
Enim is in a weird place (and not even necessary in my opinion), and the use of contra strikes me as weird too.
The motto may well be a well-composed Latin motto, but it could also be a mistaken attempt at translating "Against the Devil and other Demons".

share|improve this answer

answered 46 mins ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49k1271287

share|improve this answer

answered 46 mins ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49k1271287

answered 46 mins ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49k1271287

answered 46 mins ago

Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta

49k1271287