Gauss brackets with double vertical linesHow can I create a new extensible symbol?Use custom bracketsproblem...
How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?
How do researchers send unsolicited emails asking for feedback on their works?
Is VPN a layer 3 concept?
How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?
Exit shell with shortcut (not typing exit) that closes session properly
Would mining huge amounts of resources on the Moon change its orbit?
Recursively updating the MLE as new observations stream in
Homology of the fiber
Is this Pascal's Matrix?
Norwegian Refugee travel document
Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?
Do I need an EFI partition for each 18.04 ubuntu I have on my HD?
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?
Animating wave motion in water
Print last inputted byte
Jem'Hadar, something strange about their life expectancy
Do I need to convey a moral for each of my blog post?
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
When did hardware antialiasing start being available?
DisplayForm problem with pi in FractionBox
Emojional cryptic crossword
Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do
Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?
Gauss brackets with double vertical lines
How can I create a new extensible symbol?Use custom bracketsproblem of introducing long brackets in different linesDouble square bracketsTwo double-line equations need double left bracketsProblem with bracketsperp with two vertical linesBrackets around multiple linesCurly brackets spanning multiple lines (no math env)Impact of enclosing lines with curly bracketsbig double square bracketsDouble vertical bar with dash through it
I would like to have commands for left- and right gauss brackets which have a double vertical line, but otherwise behave exactly like lfloor
and rfloor
. In particular, they should come in various sizes and other things should stay unchanged.
I found two candidates, which are both not optimal, unfortunately:
llfloor
andrrfloor
in the packagestmaryrd
. Unfortunately they do not understand preceedingleft
andright
commands. My impression is they are fixed size.lFloor
andrFloor
in the packagenath
. They come in different sizes, but the problem is that including the packagenath
introduces automatic sizing behaviour of all symbols of parantheses-type. This might be interesting, but for the moment this change is just too radical for my taste.
symbols brackets stmaryrd nath
add a comment |
I would like to have commands for left- and right gauss brackets which have a double vertical line, but otherwise behave exactly like lfloor
and rfloor
. In particular, they should come in various sizes and other things should stay unchanged.
I found two candidates, which are both not optimal, unfortunately:
llfloor
andrrfloor
in the packagestmaryrd
. Unfortunately they do not understand preceedingleft
andright
commands. My impression is they are fixed size.lFloor
andrFloor
in the packagenath
. They come in different sizes, but the problem is that including the packagenath
introduces automatic sizing behaviour of all symbols of parantheses-type. This might be interesting, but for the moment this change is just too radical for my taste.
symbols brackets stmaryrd nath
Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets
– JPi
3 hours ago
add a comment |
I would like to have commands for left- and right gauss brackets which have a double vertical line, but otherwise behave exactly like lfloor
and rfloor
. In particular, they should come in various sizes and other things should stay unchanged.
I found two candidates, which are both not optimal, unfortunately:
llfloor
andrrfloor
in the packagestmaryrd
. Unfortunately they do not understand preceedingleft
andright
commands. My impression is they are fixed size.lFloor
andrFloor
in the packagenath
. They come in different sizes, but the problem is that including the packagenath
introduces automatic sizing behaviour of all symbols of parantheses-type. This might be interesting, but for the moment this change is just too radical for my taste.
symbols brackets stmaryrd nath
I would like to have commands for left- and right gauss brackets which have a double vertical line, but otherwise behave exactly like lfloor
and rfloor
. In particular, they should come in various sizes and other things should stay unchanged.
I found two candidates, which are both not optimal, unfortunately:
llfloor
andrrfloor
in the packagestmaryrd
. Unfortunately they do not understand preceedingleft
andright
commands. My impression is they are fixed size.lFloor
andrFloor
in the packagenath
. They come in different sizes, but the problem is that including the packagenath
introduces automatic sizing behaviour of all symbols of parantheses-type. This might be interesting, but for the moment this change is just too radical for my taste.
symbols brackets stmaryrd nath
symbols brackets stmaryrd nath
asked 5 hours ago
azimutazimut
396513
396513
Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets
– JPi
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets
– JPi
3 hours ago
Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets
– JPi
3 hours ago
tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets
– JPi
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.
A rather quick fix using scalerel
would be the following.
Conveniently, scalerel
provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>}
(and a comparable stretchleftright
) for scaling/stretching both <left obj>
and <right obj>
to the height of <stuff>
(constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>
). Here's a quick example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
begin{document}
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
end{document}
1
Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).
– azimut
3 hours ago
add a comment |
An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath
would be to place two lfloor
s next to each other with a little negative space between:
This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
}
begin{document}
[
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
]
end{document}
Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480159%2fgauss-brackets-with-double-vertical-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.
A rather quick fix using scalerel
would be the following.
Conveniently, scalerel
provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>}
(and a comparable stretchleftright
) for scaling/stretching both <left obj>
and <right obj>
to the height of <stuff>
(constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>
). Here's a quick example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
begin{document}
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
end{document}
1
Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).
– azimut
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.
A rather quick fix using scalerel
would be the following.
Conveniently, scalerel
provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>}
(and a comparable stretchleftright
) for scaling/stretching both <left obj>
and <right obj>
to the height of <stuff>
(constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>
). Here's a quick example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
begin{document}
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
end{document}
1
Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).
– azimut
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.
A rather quick fix using scalerel
would be the following.
Conveniently, scalerel
provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>}
(and a comparable stretchleftright
) for scaling/stretching both <left obj>
and <right obj>
to the height of <stuff>
(constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>
). Here's a quick example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
begin{document}
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
end{document}
Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.
A rather quick fix using scalerel
would be the following.
Conveniently, scalerel
provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>}
(and a comparable stretchleftright
) for scaling/stretching both <left obj>
and <right obj>
to the height of <stuff>
(constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>
). Here's a quick example:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
begin{document}
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
end{document}
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
PeiffapPeiffap
787
787
1
Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).
– azimut
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).
– azimut
3 hours ago
1
1
Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).
– azimut
3 hours ago
Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).
– azimut
3 hours ago
add a comment |
An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath
would be to place two lfloor
s next to each other with a little negative space between:
This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
}
begin{document}
[
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
]
end{document}
Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.
add a comment |
An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath
would be to place two lfloor
s next to each other with a little negative space between:
This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
}
begin{document}
[
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
]
end{document}
Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.
add a comment |
An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath
would be to place two lfloor
s next to each other with a little negative space between:
This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
}
begin{document}
[
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
]
end{document}
Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.
An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath
would be to place two lfloor
s next to each other with a little negative space between:
This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
}
begin{document}
[
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
]
end{document}
Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Sandy GSandy G
3,2671425
3,2671425
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480159%2fgauss-brackets-with-double-vertical-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.
– Sebastiano
5 hours ago
tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets
– JPi
3 hours ago