How to define new environment, using proof-environmentntheorem with the [amsthm] option ignores styling of a...

The vanishing of sum of coefficients: symmetric polynomials

If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?

How did the original light saber work?

Knowing when to use pictures over words

How do you funnel food off a cutting board?

How to remove trailing forward slash

Avoiding morning and evening handshakes

Rear brake cable temporary fix possible?

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

Planet at the end of Solo: A Star Wars Story

Could flying insects re-enter the Earth's atmosphere from space without burning up?

Every character has a name - does this lead to too many named characters?

Reference on complex cobordism

How to install Dc++ on Lubuntu?

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

Can pricing be copyrighted?

Am I a Rude Number?

page split between longtable caption and table

Program that converts a number to a letter of the alphabet

Finding radius of circle

How to find a specific kernel version in the Github repository?

Why did Jodrell Bank assist the Soviet Union to collect data from their spacecraft in the mid 1960's?

What makes the Forgotten Realms "forgotten"?



How to define new environment, using proof-environment


ntheorem with the [amsthm] option ignores styling of a theorem environmentIncluding end mark in definitions and examples (using amsthm)Skipping line after “Proof” in proof environmentUsing docmute to import separate document as part of proof?How can I create a customized environment?ntheorem vs. amsthmDuplicating the amsthm proof environmentHow to make proof environment without amsthm?QED symbol after statements without proofNew theorem environment with manual theorem number













1















I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.



So far, I tried



newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}



and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :



For example



 begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}


should look like




Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.











share|improve this question

























  • The text "Proof" is provided by proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.

    – barbara beeton
    1 hour ago
















1















I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.



So far, I tried



newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}



and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :



For example



 begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}


should look like




Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.











share|improve this question

























  • The text "Proof" is provided by proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.

    – barbara beeton
    1 hour ago














1












1








1








I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.



So far, I tried



newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}



and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :



For example



 begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}


should look like




Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.











share|improve this question
















I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.



So far, I tried



newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}



and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :



For example



 begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}


should look like




Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.








theorems amsthm






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Bernard

172k775203




172k775203










asked 1 hour ago









Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt

1255




1255













  • The text "Proof" is provided by proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.

    – barbara beeton
    1 hour ago



















  • The text "Proof" is provided by proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.

    – barbara beeton
    1 hour ago

















The text "Proof" is provided by proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.

– barbara beeton
1 hour ago





The text "Proof" is provided by proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.

– barbara beeton
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.



The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



The input



begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}


will produce the expected result.



If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say



newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}


A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}

begin{document}

begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

end{document}





share|improve this answer


























  • I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.

    – Mundron Schmidt
    1 hour ago











  • @MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does) sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.

    – egreg
    1 hour ago













  • Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!

    – Mundron Schmidt
    57 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477475%2fhow-to-define-new-environment-using-proof-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.



The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



The input



begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}


will produce the expected result.



If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say



newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}


A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}

begin{document}

begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

end{document}





share|improve this answer


























  • I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.

    – Mundron Schmidt
    1 hour ago











  • @MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does) sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.

    – egreg
    1 hour ago













  • Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!

    – Mundron Schmidt
    57 mins ago
















4














What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.



The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



The input



begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}


will produce the expected result.



If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say



newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}


A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}

begin{document}

begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

end{document}





share|improve this answer


























  • I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.

    – Mundron Schmidt
    1 hour ago











  • @MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does) sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.

    – egreg
    1 hour ago













  • Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!

    – Mundron Schmidt
    57 mins ago














4












4








4







What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.



The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



The input



begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}


will produce the expected result.



If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say



newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}


A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}

begin{document}

begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

end{document}





share|improve this answer















What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.



The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



The input



begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}


will produce the expected result.



If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


enter image description here



If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say



newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}


A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}

% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}

newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}

begin{document}

begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}

end{document}


You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.



documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}

usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}

begin{document}

begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}

end{document}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 1 hour ago









egregegreg

723k8819173221




723k8819173221













  • I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.

    – Mundron Schmidt
    1 hour ago











  • @MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does) sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.

    – egreg
    1 hour ago













  • Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!

    – Mundron Schmidt
    57 mins ago



















  • I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.

    – Mundron Schmidt
    1 hour ago











  • @MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does) sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.

    – egreg
    1 hour ago













  • Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!

    – Mundron Schmidt
    57 mins ago

















I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.

– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago





I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.

– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago













@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does) sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.

– egreg
1 hour ago







@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does) sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.

– egreg
1 hour ago















Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!

– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago





Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!

– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477475%2fhow-to-define-new-environment-using-proof-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

(145452) 2005 RN43 Классификация | Примечания | Ссылки |...

Щит и меч (фильм) Содержание Названия серий | Сюжет |...

Энтрерриос (город) Содержание История | Географическое...