How to define new environment, using proof-environmentntheorem with the [amsthm] option ignores styling of a...
The vanishing of sum of coefficients: symmetric polynomials
If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?
How did the original light saber work?
Knowing when to use pictures over words
How do you funnel food off a cutting board?
How to remove trailing forward slash
Avoiding morning and evening handshakes
Rear brake cable temporary fix possible?
Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
Planet at the end of Solo: A Star Wars Story
Could flying insects re-enter the Earth's atmosphere from space without burning up?
Every character has a name - does this lead to too many named characters?
Reference on complex cobordism
How to install Dc++ on Lubuntu?
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
Can pricing be copyrighted?
Am I a Rude Number?
page split between longtable caption and table
Program that converts a number to a letter of the alphabet
Finding radius of circle
How to find a specific kernel version in the Github repository?
Why did Jodrell Bank assist the Soviet Union to collect data from their spacecraft in the mid 1960's?
What makes the Forgotten Realms "forgotten"?
How to define new environment, using proof-environment
ntheorem with the [amsthm] option ignores styling of a theorem environmentIncluding end mark in definitions and examples (using amsthm)Skipping line after “Proof” in proof environmentUsing docmute to import separate document as part of proof?How can I create a customized environment?ntheorem vs. amsthmDuplicating the amsthm proof environmentHow to make proof environment without amsthm?QED symbol after statements without proofNew theorem environment with manual theorem number
I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.
So far, I tried
newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}
and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :
For example
begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}
should look like
Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.
theorems amsthm
add a comment |
I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.
So far, I tried
newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}
and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :
For example
begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}
should look like
Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.
theorems amsthm
The text "Proof" is provided byproofname, so all you need to do isrenewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.
– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.
So far, I tried
newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}
and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :
For example
begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}
should look like
Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.
theorems amsthm
I'm using the package amsthm and I like to define my own proof environment, where the title proof is replaced by Beweis.
So far, I tried
newenvironment{bew}{begin{proof}[textsc{textbf{Beweis:}}]}{end{proof}}
and this works fine. But now I like to improve the environment so that the argument should stay between Beweis and :
For example
begin{bew}[von Theorem 2.1]
Nice proof.
end{bew}
should look like
Beweis von Theorem 2.1: Nice proof.
theorems amsthm
theorems amsthm
edited 1 hour ago
Bernard
172k775203
172k775203
asked 1 hour ago
Mundron SchmidtMundron Schmidt
1255
1255
The text "Proof" is provided byproofname, so all you need to do isrenewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.
– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
The text "Proof" is provided byproofname, so all you need to do isrenewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.
– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
The text "Proof" is provided by
proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
The text "Proof" is provided by
proofname, so all you need to do is renewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.– barbara beeton
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477475%2fhow-to-define-new-environment-using-proof-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago
add a comment |
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago
add a comment |
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
What you need is just changing the period with a colon. Unfortunately, amsmath hardwires the period, so we need to patch proof in order to remove the dependency.
The name will switch to “Beweis” as soon as you load babel with an option for German, usually ngerman if you adhere to the “neue Rechtschreibung”.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:} % change to your liking
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

The input
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
will produce the expected result.
If you prefer boldface, another patch is in order.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[Beweis von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}

If your font supports boldface small caps (few fonts do), you can say
newcommand{prooffont}{scshapebfseries}
A syntax such as begin{proof}[von Satz 1] to automatically supply “Beweis” could be done too, but I'd not do it.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xpatch}
% we need to substitute . with a generic command
xpatchcmd{proof}{.}{proofpunctuation}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{itshape}{prooffont}{}{}
xpatchcmd{proof}{#1}{proofnameifxproofname#1else #1fi}{}{}
newcommand{proofpunctuation}{:}
newcommand{prooffont}{bfseries}
begin{document}
begin{proof}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
begin{proof}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{proof}
end{document}
You can also do with a new environment, which avoids patching.
documentclass{article}
usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
usepackage{amsthm}
usepackage{xparse}
NewDocumentEnvironment{bew}{o}
{proof[normalfontbfseriesproofnameIfValueT{#1}{ #1}:]}
{endproof}
begin{document}
begin{bew}
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
begin{bew}[von Satz 1]
Das ist ein schöner Beweis.
end{bew}
end{document}
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
723k8819173221
723k8819173221
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago
add a comment |
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago
I really like your last example, because in that case I don't have to change all my enviroments :-) But begin{bew}[von Satz 1] give Beweis von Satz 1:. Somehow I get a point after the doublepoint.
– Mundron Schmidt
1 hour ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)
sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.– egreg
1 hour ago
@MundronSchmidt I can only guess you tampered with space factor codes. This will happen if you set (or a package/class you load does)
sfcode`:=1000. But in that case you would get the period also without the optional argument.– egreg
1 hour ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago
Not sure, because a use copied a lot of code. But in that case I will use the first version. That works well. I thank you!
– Mundron Schmidt
57 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477475%2fhow-to-define-new-environment-using-proof-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The text "Proof" is provided by
proofname, so all you need to do isrenewcommand{proofname}{Beweis}. You should be able to change the font too, if you want to.– barbara beeton
1 hour ago