Viewing 3D relationships of layered points and DEMs by displaying absolute height for both (QGIS 3.0)Why the...
Help with identifying unique aircraft over NE Pennsylvania
Is a square zero matrix positive semidefinite?
How much propellant is used up until liftoff?
TDE Master Key Rotation
The English Debate
What kind of footwear is suitable for walking in micro gravity environment?
10 year ban after applying for a UK student visa
How to find the largest number(s) in a list of elements?
Why does Surtur say that Thor is Asgard's doom?
Weird lines in Microsoft Word
How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?
Do I need an EFI partition for each 18.04 ubuntu I have on my HD?
Exit shell with shortcut (not typing exit) that closes session properly
Jem'Hadar, something strange about their life expectancy
Why are there no stars visible in cislunar space?
Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do
How to test the sharpness of a knife?
Print a physical multiplication table
How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?
Nested Dynamic SOQL Query
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
Do I need to convey a moral for each of my blog post?
Is there any common country to visit for uk and schengen visa?
Print last inputted byte
Viewing 3D relationships of layered points and DEMs by displaying absolute height for both (QGIS 3.0)
Why the georeferencing in UTM does not work with the QGIS georeferencer?Is there any GRASS command to measure the distance between a point in rastermap and another in vector map?Topography data to elevation rasterQGIS: SAGA-GIS module “Add raster value to point” Error: unknown option 'INTERPOL'Visualising DEM with threejs plugin?Viewing 3D XYZ vector file in QGIS with QGIS2threejs pluginGrass GIS: Store vector line attribute from raster layerMidvatten plugin used with qgis2threejsQgis2threejs plugin and 3d mapsDisplaying cross sections/3D volumes in QGIS 3.X
I am using QGIS 3.4.3. I am an archaeologist and I would like to appropriately 3D view the Z relationships between (1) total station-derived points (with XYZ attributes), which I took on multiple superimposed excavation layers, along with (2) DEM or TIN rasters. These ts vector points and DEM/TIN rasters should be superimposed like a layer cake, because they are excavated surfaces that were documented sequentially as dirt was removed.
When I tried qgis2threejs (2.3.1) the DEMs/TINs are anchored way below my points when I use any vertical exaggeration (for example, .5), which is needed to see my points in three dimensions. If I don't use any vertical exaggeration, everything is flat. I'm assuming the DEM is anchored at 0 masl, whereas my points are over 3200 masl (z values). (Note that I followed the plugin's documentation and converted all file and project CRMs to 3857.) See Image:

I simply want to see the DEM displayed using its cell (Z) values so I can see its true relationship to the total station points, such as is possible in ArcScene. Here is an example of this in ArcScene (not the best example, but it shows how there is a DEM floating between a cluster of points, at its appropriate height):

When I use the built in QGIS 3D viewer, it seems I am only able to view a raster clamped to a generic place in space. My points will drape over the raster, but I need to see them in their appropriate XYZ location. If choose "Absolute" for the Altitude Clamping, the points are then moved below the DEM raster (while also shown draped on the DEM surface...):

I am confused by this, because the 3D viewer (in settings) wants you to chose a raster for the 3d image form (why?), but doesn't recognize the DEM's Z position. It allows you to display points using its "absolute" altitude, but these points can't be shown in relation to the DEM without the DEM also being visualized at its absolute altitude. (note: I tried selecting no raster and this time the points go way above the DEM, but the model is useless to navigate--everything is tiny or disappears when you zoom, and the view jumps everywhere when you try to turn the model.)
Can neither QGIS 3D view nor the qgis2threejs plugin show rasters and vector shapefiles together in their absolute positions like ArcScene can? If so, it is good to know that this is a limitation of QGIS and I should stop looking for ways around it (I respect that the 3D viewer is newish). Or am I just not understanding how to adjust settings for the rasters?
If it is a limitation of QGIS, are there any open source or affordable software options that I can use to easily view the superposition of multiple points and raster layers together in 3D? Bonus would be to also be able to click on vector points to identify their attributes. I've migrated nearly completely to QGIS from ArcGIS, but I may have reached a wall with this.
Cheers all!
qgis raster 3d qgis2threejs
New contributor
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I am using QGIS 3.4.3. I am an archaeologist and I would like to appropriately 3D view the Z relationships between (1) total station-derived points (with XYZ attributes), which I took on multiple superimposed excavation layers, along with (2) DEM or TIN rasters. These ts vector points and DEM/TIN rasters should be superimposed like a layer cake, because they are excavated surfaces that were documented sequentially as dirt was removed.
When I tried qgis2threejs (2.3.1) the DEMs/TINs are anchored way below my points when I use any vertical exaggeration (for example, .5), which is needed to see my points in three dimensions. If I don't use any vertical exaggeration, everything is flat. I'm assuming the DEM is anchored at 0 masl, whereas my points are over 3200 masl (z values). (Note that I followed the plugin's documentation and converted all file and project CRMs to 3857.) See Image:

I simply want to see the DEM displayed using its cell (Z) values so I can see its true relationship to the total station points, such as is possible in ArcScene. Here is an example of this in ArcScene (not the best example, but it shows how there is a DEM floating between a cluster of points, at its appropriate height):

When I use the built in QGIS 3D viewer, it seems I am only able to view a raster clamped to a generic place in space. My points will drape over the raster, but I need to see them in their appropriate XYZ location. If choose "Absolute" for the Altitude Clamping, the points are then moved below the DEM raster (while also shown draped on the DEM surface...):

I am confused by this, because the 3D viewer (in settings) wants you to chose a raster for the 3d image form (why?), but doesn't recognize the DEM's Z position. It allows you to display points using its "absolute" altitude, but these points can't be shown in relation to the DEM without the DEM also being visualized at its absolute altitude. (note: I tried selecting no raster and this time the points go way above the DEM, but the model is useless to navigate--everything is tiny or disappears when you zoom, and the view jumps everywhere when you try to turn the model.)
Can neither QGIS 3D view nor the qgis2threejs plugin show rasters and vector shapefiles together in their absolute positions like ArcScene can? If so, it is good to know that this is a limitation of QGIS and I should stop looking for ways around it (I respect that the 3D viewer is newish). Or am I just not understanding how to adjust settings for the rasters?
If it is a limitation of QGIS, are there any open source or affordable software options that I can use to easily view the superposition of multiple points and raster layers together in 3D? Bonus would be to also be able to click on vector points to identify their attributes. I've migrated nearly completely to QGIS from ArcGIS, but I may have reached a wall with this.
Cheers all!
qgis raster 3d qgis2threejs
New contributor
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I am using QGIS 3.4.3. I am an archaeologist and I would like to appropriately 3D view the Z relationships between (1) total station-derived points (with XYZ attributes), which I took on multiple superimposed excavation layers, along with (2) DEM or TIN rasters. These ts vector points and DEM/TIN rasters should be superimposed like a layer cake, because they are excavated surfaces that were documented sequentially as dirt was removed.
When I tried qgis2threejs (2.3.1) the DEMs/TINs are anchored way below my points when I use any vertical exaggeration (for example, .5), which is needed to see my points in three dimensions. If I don't use any vertical exaggeration, everything is flat. I'm assuming the DEM is anchored at 0 masl, whereas my points are over 3200 masl (z values). (Note that I followed the plugin's documentation and converted all file and project CRMs to 3857.) See Image:

I simply want to see the DEM displayed using its cell (Z) values so I can see its true relationship to the total station points, such as is possible in ArcScene. Here is an example of this in ArcScene (not the best example, but it shows how there is a DEM floating between a cluster of points, at its appropriate height):

When I use the built in QGIS 3D viewer, it seems I am only able to view a raster clamped to a generic place in space. My points will drape over the raster, but I need to see them in their appropriate XYZ location. If choose "Absolute" for the Altitude Clamping, the points are then moved below the DEM raster (while also shown draped on the DEM surface...):

I am confused by this, because the 3D viewer (in settings) wants you to chose a raster for the 3d image form (why?), but doesn't recognize the DEM's Z position. It allows you to display points using its "absolute" altitude, but these points can't be shown in relation to the DEM without the DEM also being visualized at its absolute altitude. (note: I tried selecting no raster and this time the points go way above the DEM, but the model is useless to navigate--everything is tiny or disappears when you zoom, and the view jumps everywhere when you try to turn the model.)
Can neither QGIS 3D view nor the qgis2threejs plugin show rasters and vector shapefiles together in their absolute positions like ArcScene can? If so, it is good to know that this is a limitation of QGIS and I should stop looking for ways around it (I respect that the 3D viewer is newish). Or am I just not understanding how to adjust settings for the rasters?
If it is a limitation of QGIS, are there any open source or affordable software options that I can use to easily view the superposition of multiple points and raster layers together in 3D? Bonus would be to also be able to click on vector points to identify their attributes. I've migrated nearly completely to QGIS from ArcGIS, but I may have reached a wall with this.
Cheers all!
qgis raster 3d qgis2threejs
New contributor
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I am using QGIS 3.4.3. I am an archaeologist and I would like to appropriately 3D view the Z relationships between (1) total station-derived points (with XYZ attributes), which I took on multiple superimposed excavation layers, along with (2) DEM or TIN rasters. These ts vector points and DEM/TIN rasters should be superimposed like a layer cake, because they are excavated surfaces that were documented sequentially as dirt was removed.
When I tried qgis2threejs (2.3.1) the DEMs/TINs are anchored way below my points when I use any vertical exaggeration (for example, .5), which is needed to see my points in three dimensions. If I don't use any vertical exaggeration, everything is flat. I'm assuming the DEM is anchored at 0 masl, whereas my points are over 3200 masl (z values). (Note that I followed the plugin's documentation and converted all file and project CRMs to 3857.) See Image:

I simply want to see the DEM displayed using its cell (Z) values so I can see its true relationship to the total station points, such as is possible in ArcScene. Here is an example of this in ArcScene (not the best example, but it shows how there is a DEM floating between a cluster of points, at its appropriate height):

When I use the built in QGIS 3D viewer, it seems I am only able to view a raster clamped to a generic place in space. My points will drape over the raster, but I need to see them in their appropriate XYZ location. If choose "Absolute" for the Altitude Clamping, the points are then moved below the DEM raster (while also shown draped on the DEM surface...):

I am confused by this, because the 3D viewer (in settings) wants you to chose a raster for the 3d image form (why?), but doesn't recognize the DEM's Z position. It allows you to display points using its "absolute" altitude, but these points can't be shown in relation to the DEM without the DEM also being visualized at its absolute altitude. (note: I tried selecting no raster and this time the points go way above the DEM, but the model is useless to navigate--everything is tiny or disappears when you zoom, and the view jumps everywhere when you try to turn the model.)
Can neither QGIS 3D view nor the qgis2threejs plugin show rasters and vector shapefiles together in their absolute positions like ArcScene can? If so, it is good to know that this is a limitation of QGIS and I should stop looking for ways around it (I respect that the 3D viewer is newish). Or am I just not understanding how to adjust settings for the rasters?
If it is a limitation of QGIS, are there any open source or affordable software options that I can use to easily view the superposition of multiple points and raster layers together in 3D? Bonus would be to also be able to click on vector points to identify their attributes. I've migrated nearly completely to QGIS from ArcGIS, but I may have reached a wall with this.
Cheers all!
qgis raster 3d qgis2threejs
qgis raster 3d qgis2threejs
New contributor
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 mins ago
Rebecca BriaRebecca Bria
1
1
New contributor
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "79"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f315899%2fviewing-3d-relationships-of-layered-points-and-dems-by-displaying-absolute-heigh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rebecca Bria is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f315899%2fviewing-3d-relationships-of-layered-points-and-dems-by-displaying-absolute-heigh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown